A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of K-285 Compared With Menthol Gel for the Treatment of Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS) in the Lower Extremity

March 11, 2022 updated by: Kowa Research Institute, Inc.

A Phase II, Randomized, Double-blind, Active Comparator, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of K-285 Compared With Menthol Gel for the Treatment of Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS) in the Lower Extremity

The purpose of this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of K-285 compared with menthol gel for the treatment of delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) in the lower extremity.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

126

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Pasadena, California, United States, 91105
        • Lotus Clinical Research, LLC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject must provide informed consent before any study-specific evaluation is performed.
  • Subject is male and female aged 18 to 35 years, inclusive.
  • Subject has a body mass index of 18 to 32 kg/m2, inclusive.
  • Subject meets all inclusion criteria outlined in the Clinical Study Protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has a job (e.g., movers, construction workers) that requires regular lifting or involvement of the lower extremities.
  • Subject has restless leg syndrome, a chronic pain condition, a history of intermittent claudication, or has taken any medication (e.g., analgesic medication, sleep medication, muscle relaxant, anticonvulsant, or antidepressant) in the last 6 months to treat a chronic pain condition, or has another painful physical condition in a lower extremity that, in the opinion of the investigator, may confound study assessments.
  • Subject has received oral or topical analgesic medications within 14 days before the Screening Visit.
  • Subject meet any other exclusion criteria outlined in the Clinical Study Protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment Arm A
K-285
88 subjects are to be assigned to 1 week dosing, four times a day (QID) (Period 1), and 32 are to be assigned to 3 weeks dosing (Period 1 and Period 2) with 16 subjects each in the two times a day (BID) and QID dosing regimens.
Active Comparator: Treatment Arm B
Menthol
88 subjects are to be assigned to 1 week dosing, four times a day (QID) (Period 1), and 32 are to be assigned to 3 weeks dosing (Period 1 and Period 2) with 16 subjects each in the two times a day (BID) and QID dosing regimens.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The sum of pain intensity difference (SPID) between 0 to 24 hours (SPID 0-24) for study leg while standing
Time Frame: 0 to 24 hours after the first gel application
Using a 0-100 point electronic visual analog scale (eVAS)
0 to 24 hours after the first gel application

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SPID 0-24 for study leg at rest
Time Frame: 0 to 24 hours after the first gel application
Using a 0-100 point eVAS scale
0 to 24 hours after the first gel application
SPID 0-12 for study leg while standing and at rest
Time Frame: 0 to 12 hours after the first gel application
Using a 0-100 point eVAS scale.
0 to 12 hours after the first gel application
SPID 0-48 for study leg while standing and at rest
Time Frame: 0 to 48 hours after the first gel application
Using a 0-100 point eVAS scale
0 to 48 hours after the first gel application
SPID 0-72 for study leg while standing and at rest
Time Frame: 0 to 72 hours after the first gel application
Using a 0-100 point eVAS scale
0 to 72 hours after the first gel application

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 19, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

March 19, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Pain

Clinical Trials on K-285

3
Subscribe