Comparative Effectiveness of Acupuncture and Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs for the Management of Aromatase Inhibitor Induced Arthralgia Among Breast Cancer Survivors

July 18, 2022 updated by: China Medical University Hospital

Hormone therapy is used to treat women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and aromatase inhibitor (AI) is administered after menopause. AI therapy has been proven to be effective in improving the disease-free survival rate, decreasing the recurrence rates and a lower incidence of contralateral breast cancer. However, arthralgia frequently reported as an important adverse event of AI therapy and sometimes resulted in noncompliance with AI therapy. The prevalence of AI induced arthralgia rates ranged from 20 to 74%. Inadequately managed AI induced arthralgia remains a major unmet need in oncology practice in breast cancer survivors.

The goal of this project is to conduct a crossover designed pragmatic clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture versus NSAID (Diclofenac) for the management of aromatase inhibitor induced arthralgia.

The third group was set to use non-steroidal analgesics plus acupuncture to evaluate the effectiveness of joint pain.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taichung, Taiwan
        • China Medical University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women who were postmenopausal aged more than 20 years old.
  • history of stage 0 to III hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, and currently taking a third-generation AI (anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane) for at least 3 month.
  • Those who reported pain and/or stiffness in one or more joints, which started or worsened after initiation of AI therapy had worst joint pain rated at least three or greater on a 0-10 numerical rating scale in the preceding week.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any prior acupuncture use for AI-induced joint symptoms or acupuncture within 1 months before entry
  • inflammatory, metabolic, or neuropathic arthropathies
  • bone fracture/surgery of an afflicted extremity during the preceding 6 months
  • allergy to NSAID
  • current use of narcotics
  • bleeding or coagulation disorders
  • localized skin infections
  • needle phobia
  • intra-articular corticosteroid within 4 weeks preceding the study
  • any severe chronic or uncontrolled comorbid disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Acupuncture to NSAIDs
Patients who were diagnosed as breast cancer and met the inclusion criteria will be recruited and randomly assigned to acupuncture group or drug (NSAIDs) group. After each subgroup completing the 4 weeks intervention, all the participants were enter washout period lasting 2 weeks to eliminate the effect of the previous treatment. Crossover was held after washout period and made the patients to have the other treatment in the following 4 weeks. After receiving the case, the third group recorded the pain indicators for the first month, followed by a one-month trial- combination of acupuncture and NSAID treatment, and then followed up for another month after stopping.
Experimental: NSAIDs to Acupuncture
Patients who were diagnosed as breast cancer and met the inclusion criteria will be recruited and randomly assigned to acupuncture group or drug (NSAIDs) group. After each subgroup completing the 4 weeks intervention, all the participants were enter washout period lasting 2 weeks to eliminate the effect of the previous treatment. Crossover was held after washout period and made the patients to have the other treatment in the following 4 weeks. After receiving the case, the third group recorded the pain indicators for the first month, followed by a one-month trial- combination of acupuncture and NSAID treatment, and then followed up for another month after stopping.
Experimental: Combined both acupuncture and NSAIDs
Patients who were diagnosed as breast cancer and met the inclusion criteria will be recruited and randomly assigned to acupuncture group or drug (NSAIDs) group. After each subgroup completing the 4 weeks intervention, all the participants were enter washout period lasting 2 weeks to eliminate the effect of the previous treatment. Crossover was held after washout period and made the patients to have the other treatment in the following 4 weeks. After receiving the case, the third group recorded the pain indicators for the first month, followed by a one-month trial- combination of acupuncture and NSAID treatment, and then followed up for another month after stopping.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acupuncture can improve joint symptoms resulting from aromatase inhibitor and quality of life
Time Frame: one year

Patients will be asked to complete a baseline questionnaire covering demographic information and reproductive history. At baseline and at 4, 6 and 10 weeks, self-administered questionnaires including the 10mm visual analogue scales. Follow-up assessments will be conducted at the 4 weeks after the end of intervention.

According to statistically estimation, we compare the changes between three subgroups and hypothesize 20% difference as significant effect after intervention. We use ANOVA to calculate the sample size with an alpha of 0.05 as significance level, approximately 80% power and 20% drop-out rate. The trial will enroll 145 participants.

one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 28, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Diclofenac

3
Subscribe