Evaluation of Oral Plaque Removal Utilizing an Adjunct Enzyme Pre-rinse

November 8, 2020 updated by: Kelton Stewart, Indiana University

A Visual Evaluation of Oral Plaque Removal Utilizing an Adjunct Enzyme Pre-rinse in Orthodontic Subjects

This study aims to investigate the impact of a bromelain pre-rinse adjunct on oral plaque removal in orthodontic subjects. The study's null hypothesis states that there is no statistically significant difference in visual plaque scores among orthodontic subjects with or without proteolytic enzyme rinse aid.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Bromelain, a naturally occurring cysteine protease, from pineapple stalks, is used in food and medical industries and listed on the FDA's "Generally Recognized As Safe" (GRAS) list. In vitro bromelain study demonstrated antibacterial effect on oral pathogens. Bromelain was found to prevent biofilm formation by interfering with bacteria-bacteria adhesion and/or adhesion to enamel surface. Clinical trials with toothpaste containing bromelain demonstrated improved plaque and gingivitis scores and extrinsic enamel stain removal capabilities. The impact of bromelain application prior to traditional mechanisms of plaque removal have not been clearly evaluated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Indiana University School of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 25 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • male or female
  • 10 to 25 years of age
  • willing to consent to participation
  • able to follow study instructions
  • in active orthodontic treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unwilling/unable to follow study instructions
  • documented/suspected pineapple allergy
  • proteolytic enzyme allergy
  • food dye allergy
  • smoker

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental: Bromelain, Then Placebo
Subjects were asked to chew a disclosing tablet, swish, and expectorate. Intraoral photographs were obtained. They then received a vial containing 1 gram of bromelain that was reconstituted with 15ml of pineapple juice at 50 degrees F. Subjects swished the solution in their mouth for 2 minutes and then expectorated. Intraoral photographs were obtained. Subjects then received a toothbrush and were asked to brush their teeth for 2 minutes. Intraoral photographs were obtained. The subjects were then given a Waterpik and instructed to use the appliances to clean their teeth and brackets to the best of their ability, for 2 minutes. Intraoral photographs were obtained. After a 1 week washout period, they received the placebo rinse (powdered sugar), following the same protocol and series of intraoral photographs.
The subjects were randomized to either receive the bromelain pre-rinse or the powdered sugar placebo pre-rinse. Subjects then had a 5-9 day washout period and was then exposed to the other intervention.
Other Names:
  • proteolytic enzyme rinse
The subjects were randomized to either receive the bromelain pre-rinse or the powdered sugar placebo pre-rinse. Subjects then had a 5-9 day washout period and was then exposed to the other intervention.
Other Names:
  • placebo rinse
Placebo Comparator: Experimental: Placebo, Then Bromelain
Subjects were asked to chew a disclosing tablet, swish, and expectorate. Intraoral photographs were obtained. They then received a vial containing 1 gram of powdered sugar that was reconstituted with 15ml of pineapple juice at 50 degrees F. Subjects swished the solution in their mouth for 2 minutes and then expectorated. Intraoral photographs were obtained. Subjects then received a toothbrush and were asked to brush their teeth for 2 minutes. Intraoral photographs were obtained. The subjects were then given a Waterpik and instructed to use the appliances to clean their teeth and brackets to the best of their ability, for 2 minutes. Intraoral photographs were obtained. After a 1 week washout period, they received the bromelain rinse, following the same protocol and series of intraoral photographs.
The subjects were randomized to either receive the bromelain pre-rinse or the powdered sugar placebo pre-rinse. Subjects then had a 5-9 day washout period and was then exposed to the other intervention.
Other Names:
  • proteolytic enzyme rinse
The subjects were randomized to either receive the bromelain pre-rinse or the powdered sugar placebo pre-rinse. Subjects then had a 5-9 day washout period and was then exposed to the other intervention.
Other Names:
  • placebo rinse

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite Plaque Score
Time Frame: 1 day
The composite plaque score refers to the cumulative plaque score of all twelve teeth following the administration of the bromelain and placebo (powdered sugar) solutions. The composite plaque score scale had a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 48. A score of 0 indicated no plaque was observed on the teeth, while a a score of 48 indicated severe plaque on all possible tooth surfaces. A lower plaque score reflects a better outcome, while a higher plaque score a worse outcome.
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kelton Stewart, DDS, MS, Indiana University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 14, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 24, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

March 4, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 3, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Caries

Clinical Trials on Bromelain

3
Subscribe