His-pacing and AV-node Ablation vs. Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation (His-PAAF)

February 28, 2024 updated by: Region Skane

Physiological Pacemaker Treatment in Combination With AV Node Ablation Compared With Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Patients With Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation - a Randomized Controlled Study

Objective To investigate if conduction system pacing ((CSP) i.e. atrioventricular node ablation + His bundle pacing or Left Bundle Branch pacing) is as good as (or better than) atrial fibrillation ablation with pulmonary vein isolation for older patients (70-85yrs) with symptomatic atrial fibrillation and at least moderately dilated left atrium.

Patient population:

90 patients aged 70-85 years with atrial fibrillation, referred to either AV node ablation or pulmonary vein isolation.

Primary endpoint:

Improvement in health-related quality of life as measured by the physical component summary (PCS) of the well-validated SF-36 form, at one year after AV node ablation + CSP or AF ablation.

Secondary endpoints:

Physical performance measured by 6-minute walk test, biochemical markers of heart failure (NT-ProBNP), frequency of complications, left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, and left atrial size evaluated after 12 months. Arrhythmia specific symptoms and anxiety will be measured with the ASTA and HADS questionnaires. Arrhythmia symptom correlation between subjective and objective findings. After three years, clinical endpoints will be evaluated regarding overall survival, and risk of heart failure hospitalization or death. The cost of the treatments will be compared, and estimated cost per quality adjusted year of life will be calculated, based on the EQ5D questionnaire.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Linköping, Sweden
      • Lund, Sweden, 221 85
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Skåne University Hospital
      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Stockholm Arrhythmia Center
      • Varberg, Sweden

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

70 years to 85 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Indication for invasive treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation according to current guidelines
  • LVEF >35%
  • Age 70-85 years
  • Persistent atrial fibrillation, or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with at least moderate enlargement of the left atrium (≥42ml/m2)
  • Chronic and well-tolerated treatment with anticoagulants (either non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant or vitamin K antagonist)
  • Willingness to participate, to understand the instructions and fill out the questionnaires, and ability to sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic atrial fibrillation with >1 year duration
  • BMI >40kg/m2
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  • Severe heart failure with symptoms ≥ NYHA class IIIb
  • Heart amyloidosis
  • Cardiac sarcoidosis
  • Recent (<3 months) myocardial infarction
  • Significant heart valve disease (pronounced insufficiency or stenosis)
  • Pacemaker or ICD treatment ongoing, or current pacemaker indication
  • Congenital heart disease that required surgical correction
  • Comorbidity that is assessed significantly affect the patient's quality of life over the next year, or 3-year survival

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Conduction System pacing plus AV node ablation

A His-pacing lead in combination with a backup RV pacing lead or an LBB pacing lead, and a right atrial lead (if needed) will be placed using standard technique. The His-pacing or LBB pacing lead will be Medtronic 3830, and the outer sheath will be either Medtronic C304 or C315 deflectable. If failure to implant with these tools, other leads and sheaths can be used at the discretion of the operator. A standard DDD pacemaker or CRT-P device from Medtronic will be used.

A minimum of three weeks post-implant, the device will be interrogated and His-bundle threshold will be evaluated. A threshold of ≤2.0V@1.0ms is acceptable. If the device is well-functioning and successful His-pacing is documented, AV node ablation will be performed.

See study arm description.
Active Comparator: Pulmonary vein isolation
Atrial fibrillation will be performed as a complete pulmonary vein isolation. Either Cryoballon or radio frequency ablation with irrigated tip contact force enabled catheter can be used. Pulsed field ablation can be used if available. Endpoint is complete electrical isolation of all pulmonary veins, verified by entry- and exit block using a multipolar catheter during pacing.
See study arm description

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health related Quality of Life: questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months
Improvement in the Physical Component Summary (PCS) of the SF-36 questionnaire
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety endpoint: Proportion of patients with major adverse events
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of patients with major adverse events that are devicerelated or related to ablation procedure (including but not limited to exit block, infection, perforation/tamponade, pericardial effusion, lead dislodgement, TIA/stroke, oesophago-atrial fistula, groin hematoma or vascular complication, pseudoaneurysm, phrenic nerve injury).
12 months
Mental Quality of Life: questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months
Improvement of the "mental" health related quality of life, measured by the mental component summary (MCS) of the SF-36 questionnaire
12 months
Arrhythmia related Quality of Life: ASTA questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months

Change in arrhythmia related quality of life as measured by the The Arrhythmia-Specific questionnaire in Tachycardia. The ASTA questionnaire consists of 13 items, each with a score of 0-4. A higher score denotes more symptoms associated with the arrhythmia.

and Arrhythmia (ASTA) questionnaire

12 months
Anxiety and depression
Time Frame: 12 months
Anxiety and depression symptoms, measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The scale consists of 14 questions with 0 to 3 points for each, with a higher score denoting more depression/anxiety
12 months
Ejection fraction
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in left ventricular systolic ejection fraction
12 months
Biomarker for heart failure
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in NT-ProBNP level
12 months
Physical performance
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in six minute walk test distance
12 months
Electrocardiography changes
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in QRS duration on ECG
12 months
Health economy
Time Frame: 12 months
Total atrial fibrillation and device related health care cost
12 months
Survival
Time Frame: 3 years
Total survival and survival free of major complications
3 years
Hospitalization for heart failure
Time Frame: 3 years
Risk of hospitalization for heart failure assessed by Kaplan Meier time dependent analysis using time from ablation to first hospitalization for heart failure within three years
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rasmus Borgquist, MD PhD, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Arrhythmia Section, Lund, Sweden

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Conduction System pacing and AV node ablation

3
Subscribe