- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04554537
Strategic Memory and Reasoning Training for Cognitive Problems (SMART)
Strategic Memory and Reasoning Training for Cognitive Problems Due to Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
The focus of this study is to test a treatment program (Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training; SMART) that was developed to address specific brain functions found to be crucial for the recovery following traumatic brain injury (TBI). New research has shown that when these very specific brain functions are targeted, such as ability to focus on a task while ignoring irrelevant information, brain changes are more significant. SMART emphasizes top-down processing by targeting focused attention, assimilation of information, and mental flexibility and innovation, all higher-order cognitive functions driven by the frontal lobes. Evidence from other top-down cognitive training programs demonstrates their effectiveness in improving cognitive and daily functioning in individuals reporting a TBI. In addition to improving frontal lobe capacity, SMART has also been shown to increase brain blood flow critical for complex thinking and strengthen white matter integrity. The effectiveness of SMART has been extensively tested with a variety of populations, including healthy adults and adolescents, adolescents with brain injuries, healthy seniors and those at risk for Alzheimers, and veterans and civilians with lingering impairment following TBIs. This will be the first study to test its effectiveness with individuals with mild TBI (MTBI) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
The SMART program has previously been tested with patients with TBI using an 18-hour training format. When compared to the Brain Health Workshop (BHW), an education-based active learning module, participants in the SMART group (n = 31) demonstrated improvements in gist reasoning, executive function, and memory, generalization of improvement to daily functioning activities and continuation of these gains 6 months posttraining. The training consisted of 15 hours of training conducted over 10 group sessions in the first 5 weeks and a final 3 hours of training at spaced intervals over the next 3 weeks. SMART training has not been tested with patients with PTSD-related neuropsychological impairments. The purpose of the current study is to investigate the efficacy of a shortened training program (9 hours) in improving neurocognitive function in patients with mTBI and/or PTSD.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:Inclusion criteria include .
- adults between the ages of 19 to 65 years
- speak and comprehend English, as not all of the standardized cognitive tests have been normed for non-English speakers
- diagnosis of either mild or moderate TBI (as defined by OSU TBI interview) and/or diagnosis of subthreshold or full PTSD (as determined by Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale)
Exclusion Criteria:
- someone who is not proficient in reading, comprehending, and speaking English
- self-report on phone screen interview of pre-existing cerebral palsy, intellectual disability, autism, epilepsy, schizophrenia, stroke, pervasive developmental disorder, or a diagnosed learning disability
- history of psychotic disorder or bipolar disorder (by self-report)
- current alcohol or drug dependence (by self-report)
- severe TBI (determined by OSU TBI interview)
- participants who are determined by the TOMM (more than five errors on Trial 2 or the Retention trial) to be malingering neuropsychological problems
- neuropsychological testing or r any cognitive training in the past 3 months as this could introduce practice effects.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Placebo Comparator: Brain Health Workshop
The BHW training has been used in multiple prior studies as a comparison training program in cognitive training trials It consists of sessions of fact-based information about the brain but does not train cognitive strategies.
Topics include neuroanatomy, neuroplasticity, and effects of TBI on cognitive functioning.
Other sessions focus on diet, exercise, sleep, and social functioning and their relationships to brain health.
Participants are encouraged to share how the topics impact their lives.
Participants are given take-home reading materials on related topics that were then discussed at the last session.
At home, they were instructed to watch assigned videos but had no other homework.
|
A psychoeducation program designed to provide in depth information to participants about the neuroscience behind their TBI and PTSD and the symptoms and challenges they may experience.
|
Experimental: SMART
SMART emphasizes top-down processing by targeting focused attention, assimilation of information, and mental flexibility and innovation, all higher-order cognitive functions driven by the frontal lobes.
SMART was delivered in small groups (n = 2 to 8) consisting of two 3-hour sessions over two days, followed by one 3-hour session a month later.
Overall, sessions focused on strategic attention, integrative reasoning, and cognitive control functions (Chapman, 2014).
Training consists of initial sessions of skills training with the one-month follow-up session being a "booster session" consisting of review.
We modified the training such that all sessions included skills training with briefer review.
The first two sessions consisted of strategic attention and integrated reasoning and the final session discussed innovation.
|
A treatment program developed to address specific brain functions found to be crucial for the recovery following brain injury.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
CHANGE in Digit Span test of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Fourth Edition
Time Frame: Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
Digit Span requires participants to repeat digits forwards, backwards, and sequences in ascending order; the combined score of these three tasks was used, which is then converted to a scaled score with a range of 1 to 19.
Higher scores represent better performance.
|
Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
CHANGE in Digit Symbol and Symbol Search tests, which comprise the Processing Speed Index of the WAIS-IV
Time Frame: Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
To assess processing speed and visual-motor coordination.
The Processing Speed Index is a standard score with a range of 50 to 150 with higher scores indicating better performance.
|
Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
CHANGE in California Verbal Learning Test
Time Frame: Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
Participants hear a word list over five trials and repeat back as many words as they can remember; the sum of trials 1-5 serves as a measure of immediate verbal memory and the delayed memory for the words 20 minutes later serves as a measure of delayed verbal memory.
Scores are converted from raw scores to T scores.
T scores have a range of 20 to 80, with higher scores representing bettery performance.
|
Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
CHANGE in Logical Memory task of the Wechsler Memory Scale, 4th edition
Time Frame: Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
assess verbal learning and memory in a narrative context.
Participants were presented with a short story and asked to repeat back as much of the story as possible immediately after.
Details of the stories are totaled and raw scores are converted to scaled scores.
Both immediate memory and delayed memory received a scaled score, range from 1 to 19 with higher scores indicating better performance.
|
Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
CHANGE in Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised
Time Frame: Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
a measure of immediate and delayed visuospatial memory.
The participant must memorize a series of designs over three trials and recreate them from memory, both immediately following display and after a delay of 20 minutes.
A sum of Trials 1-3 represents the immediate raw score which is then converted to a T score.
The T scores have a range of 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating better performance.
|
Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
CHANGE in Trail Making Test of the Delis-Kaplan Executive Functioning System
Time Frame: Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
Assess cognitive flexibility, verbal fluency, inhibitory control.
There are five conditions, and the final condition, the "switching condition" is the score used.
It is a measure of seconds taken to complete the task which is then converted to a scaled score, with a range of 1 to 19, with higher scores representing better performance.
|
Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
CHANGE in Test of Strategic Learning
Time Frame: Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
The TOSL involves synthesizing gist meaning from complex information.
Participants read a complex passage and are instructed to generate a high-level summary of what they read.
Three scores are generated and are presented as raw scores, with higher scores indicating better performance.
The summary abstraction score reflects the total number of accurately abstracted meanings from the reading; the high-level lessons score measures the number of high-level lessons the participants gleaned from the story; and the detail total score measures participants' memory for the story's detail-based information.
|
Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
CHANGE in Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI)
Time Frame: Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
22-item self-report measure of postconcussive symptoms.
We specifically examined the Cognitive subscale of the NSI at all time points.
The range for this scale is 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating more self-reported impairment
|
Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
CHANGE in Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-5
Time Frame: Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
Assesses posttraumatic stress diagnosis and symptoms.
Range of scores is 0 to 80 with higher scores indicating higher PTSD symptom severity.
|
Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
CHANGE in Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test
Time Frame: Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
To assess working memory, sustained attention, and divided attention, participants were asked to listen to an audio tape presenting a series of single-digit numbers and then state aloud the sum of the number more recently presented plus the number preceding it.
There were two trials and the number of correct answers for both trials is summed.
Higher scores indicated better performance.
|
Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
CHANGE in Continuous Performance Test performance
Time Frame: Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
To assess sustained attention, vigilance, inhibitory control, and inattention, the computer-based Conners' Continuous Performance Test 3rd Edition was administered.
Errors of omission are a measure of sustained attention and errors of commission are a measure of inhibitory control.
Raw scores are converted to T scores.
Higher scores indicate more omissions and commissions, or poorer performance.
|
Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
CHANGE in Delis-Kaplan Executive Functioning System Color-Word Interference Test performance
Time Frame: Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
To assess change in inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility, the "interference condition" of the Color-Word Test was used.
Raw scores are converted to scaled scores, with a range of 1 to 19 with higher scores representing better performance.
|
Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
CHANGE in Delis-Kaplan Executive Functioning System Verbal Fluency performance
Time Frame: Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
To assess change in verbal fluency, two tasks were administered: the Letter Fluency subtest and the Category Fluency subtest.
Raw scores are converted into scaled scores, with a range of 1 to 19 with higher scores representing better performance.
|
Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in subjective cognitive complaints
Time Frame: Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
To assess change in subjective cognitive complaints, the Cognitive Self-Report Questionnaire was administered.
Total score from the cognitive subscale will be used, with scores ranging from 12 to 60. Higher scores represent more cognitive complaints.
|
Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
Change in Quality of Life
Time Frame: Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
To assess change in quality of life, the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale was administered.
The total score was used, which ranges from 25 to 125, with higher scores indicating higher quality of life and functioning across domains
|
Pre-training, immediately post-training and six months later
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kristin W Samuelson, PhD, UCCS
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SMART
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Traumatic Brain Injury
-
Fondazione per la Ricerca Ospedale MaggioreCompletedBrain Injuries, Traumatic | Brain Injury Traumatic Severe | Brain Injury Traumatic ModerateItaly
-
Toronto Rehabilitation InstituteCentre for Aging and Brain Health Innovation; Ontario Neurotrauma FoundationUnknownBrain Injuries, Traumatic | Brain Injury, Chronic | Brain Injury Traumatic Severe | Brain Injury Traumatic ModerateCanada
-
Hospital Sirio-LibanesUniversity of Sao Paulo; Ministry of Health, Brazil; Hospital Sao Rafael; PROAD... and other collaboratorsRecruitingBrain Injury Traumatic Severe | Brain Injury Traumatic Moderate | Post Traumatic EpilepsyBrazil
-
University of TurkuTurku University Hospital; The Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation... and other collaboratorsCompletedBrain Injuries | TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury) | Brain Injuries, Traumatic | Traumatic Brain Injury | Injury, Brain, TraumaticFinland
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiUniversity of CincinnatiCompletedBrain Injury Traumatic MildUnited States
-
BrainScope Company, Inc.RecruitingTBI (Traumatic Brain Injury) | Concussion, Brain | MTBI - Mild Traumatic Brain Injury | Closed Head InjuryUnited States
-
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche...Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en AutomatiqueNot yet recruitingTBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)France
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalUnknownTraumatic Brain Injury | Severe Brain Injury | Closed Traumatic Brain InjuryBrazil
-
Queen Mary University of LondonCompleted
-
First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityXijing Hospital; Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University; Central... and other collaboratorsRecruitingMTBI - Mild Traumatic Brain Injury | Moderate Traumatic Brain InjuryChina
Clinical Trials on Brain Health Workshop
-
Sunnaas Rehabilitation HospitalUniversity of Oslo; Oslo University Hospital; University of GlasgowCompleted
-
Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyOslo University Hospital; St. Olavs Hospital; Norwegian Cancer SocietyActive, not recruitingChildhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia | Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Childhood Non-Hodgkin LymphomaNorway
-
The University of Texas at DallasCompleted
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentRecruitingBrain Injury | Post Traumatic Stress DisorderUnited States
-
St. Olavs HospitalOslo University HospitalCompleted
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompletedMild Traumatic Brain InjuryUnited States
-
BaycrestUniversity Health Network, Toronto; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; McGill... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
University of WaterlooActive, not recruitingPsychological DistressCanada
-
Gerencia de Atención Primaria, MadridActive, not recruitingFear of Falling | Falls | NursingSpain
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Completed