Rivaroxaban vs. Warfarin in CVT Treatment (RWCVT)

February 15, 2023 updated by: Damascus University

Rivaroxaban Compared to Warfarin for Treatment of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is an uncommon venous-type of stroke tends to affect younger patients with somewhat different risk factors and much better outcome compared to arterial strokes. Anti-coagulation is the standard of treatment for patients with (CVT) initially with heparins followed by other oral blood thinners for several months. In this study, the investigators are comparing warfarin with another well-known blood thinner, rivaroxaban, which has a fixed once-daily dose with no need for monitoring in terms of clinical outcomes and complications.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background:

Cerebral venous and/or dural sinus thrombosis (CVT) is an uncommon but increasingly recognized form of stroke accounts for up to 1% of all cerebral vascular accidents (CVAs), with an estimated incidence of 5 cases per million people per year, it usually affects young patients with a female to male ratio of 3:1.

The pathogenesis of CVT is still not entirely clear. Partly because of the highly variable venous anatomy and the shortage of animal studies. However, decreased venous blood flow drainage and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) absorption may lead to elevation of intracranial pressure and/or cerebral parenchymal lesions or dysfunction that may contribute to the clinical features of CVT.

Diagnosis and management of (CVT) can be challenging given the diversity of causes and risk factors with a wide range of symptoms and signs. At least one identifiable risk factor was found in 85% of patients of the (ISCVT) study while multiple predisposing factors were found in 44%. The most common risk factors were oral contraceptives and inherited and acquired thrombophilia conditions.

the most common symptom is headache. It is found in 90% of patients with (CVT) usually associated with focal neurological symptoms or seizures. Isolated headaches account only for 15% of patients.

diagnosis of (CVT) depends on high level of clinical suspicion followed by neuroimaging (preferably some specific MRI modalities).

Anti-coagulation is the standard of treatment for patients with (CVT) based on small randomized clinical trials and reviews and wide consensus opinion of most experts.There is still no solid evidence from large randomized clinical trials. It is thought that anticoagulation may stop growth of the thrombus and permit recanalization mechanisms . it also may hinder other thrombotic events.

A trial compared an adjusted doses of intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) with placebo was stopped early after 20 of the planned 60 patients were enrolled because there was an obvious benefit of treatment.

Based on consensus, current recommendations for the duration of anticoagulation in patients with (CVT) are dependent mainly on the presence of provoking factor/s which may be transient or persistent. Thus duration ranges from 3 to 6 months for reversible causes (e.g. OCP) of provoked (CVT) to indefinite treatment period of anticoagulation for recurrent unprovoked (CVT) or severe thrombophilia state. Traditionally, warfarin is used after a bridging period of Heparins with INR target 2.0 to 3.0.

Rivaroxaban is a selective reversible anti-Factor X anticoagulant, that has a good bioavailability, much predictable pharmacokinetics, and maybe a lower risk for major bleeding in comparison to warfarin. Therefore, laboratory monitoring and dose adjustments are almost unnecessary. However, rivaroxaban has not been thoroughly studied for CVT.

The objective of the study:

To compare warfarin to rivaroxaban in CVT patients in terms of short and long term outcomes, and complications.

Methods:

planned sample: 60 patients. study design: Subjects will be enrolled from Damascus University hospitals (Almouassat University hospital, and Alassad University hospital) and Almujtahed (Damascus public hospital) and randomly assigned to the two arms of the study (rivaroxaban or warfarin) using web-based random number generator application called "Research Randomizer. The warfarin arm will serve as the control group. No blinding will be applied due to safety and ethical issues.

Subjects will be followed up monthly for 6 months to evaluate clinical outcomes.

Subjects confirmed to have elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) will receive Acetazolamide 500 mg (bid) for two weeks then will be tapered gradually if possible as needed.

Concomitant use of any anticonvulsants will be recorded for further sub-groups analysis.

Used measures:

  • Sinus venous thrombosis severity scale (SVTSS)
  • Patient's independency using Barthel index.
  • intracranial pressure (ICP) using fundoscopy, or direct ICP measuring.
  • diagnostic DSA, CT and MRI scans.
  • Hemoglobin level for hemorrhagic complications.
  • INR test to adjust the warfarin doses.

Quality assurance plan, Data checks, and Source data verification:

The data will be collected by the investigators directly from the patients, their families, and their medical records. at least two investigators will evaluate each patient to affirm objective and accurate assessment of outcome measures. The data will be entered manually after collection into a Google Forms page that contains fields of all the required data, which will automatically produce the corresponding Excel sheet. The principal investigator will review and double-check the collected data and comparing the final excel sheet with patients' data collected from patients and their surrogates' interviews, their medical files, imaging reports, and chats.

Plan for Data Analysis:

Percentages for nominal input, Medians for clinical scores. For continuous outcomes, the investigators will use Mann Whitney test for two-group data, and Kruskal Wallis for 3+ data groups. Nominal outcomes: Chi-square when the assumptions apply, and Fisher exact test when they don't. The analysis will be done using SPSS 25 software primarily, along with EXCEL.

Missing data will be treated as per the professional statistical methods.

_______________________________________________________________________

Appendix 1:

To avoid any subjective bias, the investigators will define each element of (SVTSS) scale as the following:

● headache severity will be scaled depending on the "Functional Pain Scale (FPS)" as Slight (2), Moderate (4 - 6), Severe (8 - 10).

functional pain scale detailed as follows: 0: No pain. 2: Tolerable, activities not prevented. 4: Tolerable prevents some activities. 6: Intolerable prevents many active (not passive) activities. 8: Intolerable, prevents all active and many passive activities. 10: Intolerable incapacitated, unable to do anything or speak due to pain.

Active activities: usual activities or those requiring effort (turning, walking, etc.) Passive activities: talking on phone, watching TV, reading

● Focal signs:

  • Transient: lasting less than 24 hours.
  • Mild paresis: any degree of minimal persistent weakness that can only be noticed by comparing with the other side.
  • Moderate paresis: obvious weakness but still can move limb against gravity.
  • Severe Paresis: any limb movement but not against gravity or complete plegia.

The investigators will consider any other focal neurologic sign (e.g. cranial nerve lesions or palsies) as a focal paresis and will be scaled as mild if minimal defect, moderate if obvious defect, and severe if leads to functional disability (e.g. visual loss). The investigators will except abducens nerve palsies from scaling and consider any degree of diplopia as "Mild paresis".

If multiple focal neurologic deficits are present. Patients will be scored upon the most severe focal sign.

● Seizures: the investigators define seizure as a clinical convulsive seizure.

Obvious other cause/s of seizure/s not related to a new complication of the disease or anticoagulation treatment (e.g. poor compliance with anticonvulsant drugs) will not affect the severity scale (i.e. changing SVTSS score).

● Consciousness: depending on Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary 32nd edition the investigators define:

  • Confusion: disturbed orientation in regard to time, place, or person.
  • Psychosis: a mental disorder characterized by gross impairment in reality testing as evidenced by delusions, hallucinations, markedly incoherent speech, or disorganized and agitated behavior.
  • Somnolence: drowsiness or sleepiness, particularly in excess.
  • Stupor: a lowered level of consciousness manifested by the subject's responding only to vigorous stimulation.
  • Coma: a state of unconsciousness from which the patient cannot be aroused, even by powerful stimulation.
  • Dead: destitute of life.

Any new/worsening focal sign, new/relapsing seizure/s, or deterioration in the level of consciousness will be documented and promptly investigated as a probable worsening in severity scale due to disease (i.e. CVT) or treatment complication/s (e.g. intracranial hemorrhage) and will prompt emergent evaluation and repeating neuroimaging as needed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

71

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Syrian Arab Republic
    • Damascus Governorate
      • Damascus, Damascus Governorate, Syrian Arab Republic
        • Damascus university

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients aged 14 years or older and weighing more than 50 kg.
  • Recent diagnosis of symptomatic cerebral venous thrombosis confirmed by MRI modalities, CT venography, or conventional angiography.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any absolute contraindication to anticoagulation.
  • Impaired renal function (CrCl < 30 mL/min using Cockcroft-Gault equation).
  • Pregnancy or lactation at randomization.
  • mandatory other blood thinners use (e.g. Aspirin).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Warfarin arm
Patients randomly assigned to (W) group will receive an adjusted dose of warfarin with targeted INR of 2.0 to 3.0.
Drug: Warfarin
Warfarin (Orfarin®) is the most popular vitamin K antagonist and is considered the standard of care in many venous and arterial anticoagulation indications with extensive clinical experience regarding its use. This inexpensive and effective drug has a narrow therapeutic window that is affected by diet changing and many drug interactions, making frequent monitoring with prothrombin time (PT)/international normalized ratio (INR) highly important.(14)
Other Names:
  • Orfarin®
Experimental: Rivaroxaban arm
Patients randomly assigned to (R) group will receive 20mg rivaroxaban daily if CrCl>50 mL/min using Cockcroft-Gault equation or 15mg rivaroxaban daily if CrCl 30-50 mL/min.
Drug: Rivaroxaban
Rivaroxaban (Rovaltro®) is a novel oral anticoagulant that acts selectively, reversibly, and potently on activated Factor X (Factor Xa) inhibiting a critical point on the coagulation cascade. Rivaroxaban has excellent bioavailability, rapid onset of peak anticoagulation effect, and predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties making routine laboratory monitoring and dose adjustments almost unnecessary (11). Rivaroxaban is an extensively studied drug and has received approvals for anticoagulation in several preventive and therapeutic indications (11). Now medical literature has some solid evidence that Rivaroxaban is comparable with other anticoagulants in terms of efficacy. Several studies imply that Rivaroxaban may have a lower risk of major bleeding (11). Several reports and small case-series (12,13) suggest that rivaroxaban may be beneficial as Warfarin in the treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) with less or no major complications.
Other Names:
  • Rovaltro®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of sinus venous thrombosis severity scale (SVTSS)
Time Frame: SVTSS score will be evaluated at the point of admission, and each month after for 6 months later

it was designed by Einhaupl 1991 who performed with his colleagues the first clinical trial of heparin in (CVT) Patients score is given to each of the 4 categories as follows:

  1. Headache: (1: slight, 2: moderate, 3: severe)
  2. Focal signs: (1: transient or minimum hypesthesia, 2: transient or slight paresis, 3: mild paresis, 4: moderate paresis, 5: severe paresis or plegia)
  3. seizures: (3: seizures (no series or status), 4: series or status)
  4. consciousness: (5: confused or psychotic, 6: somnolent, 7: stupor, 8: coma, 9: dead).

Please refer to appendix 1 for more details
SVTSS score will be evaluated at the point of admission, and each month after for 6 months later

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Barthel index
Time Frame: Barthel index will be evaluated at the point of admission, and each month after for 6 months later
a scale of (0-100) points evaluating the performance in activities of daily living (ADL) in 10 categories including feeding, bathing, grooming, dressing, bowel control, bladder control, toileting, chair transfer, ambulation, and stair climbing. A higher number represents more independence in ADL.
Barthel index will be evaluated at the point of admission, and each month after for 6 months later

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of intracranial pressure ICP
Time Frame: ICP will be evaluated at the point of admission, and each month after for 6 months later
The investigators will evaluate elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) directly by measuring (ICP) or indirectly by fundoscopic examination of the optic discs. Elevated ICP will be defined as more than 250 mm H2O. or the presence of established papilledema defined as Stage 2 (or higher) of Frisen Scale: "Obscuration of all borders, Elevation of the nasal border, Complete peripapillary halo". The severity of papilledema will not be considered to avoid subjective errors.
ICP will be evaluated at the point of admission, and each month after for 6 months later
Development of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH)
Time Frame: Within 6 months of follow up after discharge, patients will be monitored for any new symptom suggesting ICH to be investigated and managed when necessary.
a new (ICH) or worsening of existing (ICH) with more than one-third of hematoma volume on neuroimaging, leading to a shift of one point or more in the modified Rankin scale (A scale for measuring the degree of disability in patients who have a stroke).
Within 6 months of follow up after discharge, patients will be monitored for any new symptom suggesting ICH to be investigated and managed when necessary.
Development of major extra-cranial bleeding (MECB)
Time Frame: Within 6 months of follow up after discharge, patients will be monitored for any new symptom suggesting MECB to be investigated and managed when necessary.
: it is defined according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) as clinically overt bleeding accompanied by a decrease in the hemoglobin level of at least 2 g/dL or transfusion of at least 2 units of packed red cells, or occurring at a critical site (intraocular, intraspinal, intraarticular, intramuscular with compartment syndrome, pericardial, retroperitoneal) or resulting in death.
Within 6 months of follow up after discharge, patients will be monitored for any new symptom suggesting MECB to be investigated and managed when necessary.
Necessity of dose titration during follow up period
Time Frame: Within 6 months of follow up after discharge.
Number of dose titration attempts (if any) will be recorded each month for 6 months later.
Within 6 months of follow up after discharge.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Damascus University

Collaborators

Unipharma, HamaPharma, Almujtahed hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 3934

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Vein Thrombosis

Clinical Trials on Warfarin

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Burundi

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe