A Study of PTR-01 in Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa

September 14, 2021 updated by: Phoenix Tissue Repair, Inc.

A Phase 2 Open-Label Study of PTR-01 in Patients With Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa (RDEB)

Protocol PTR-01-002 is a 3-part Phase 2, open-label study of PTR-01. While new patients will be enrolled, priority will be given to patients that satisfactorily completed study PTR-01-001.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Protocol PTR-01-002 is a 3-part Phase 2, open-label study of PTR-01. While new patients will be enrolled, priority will be given to patients that satisfactorily completed study PTR-01-001.

In Part 1, patients will receive a dose of 3.0 mg/kg every week for a total of 4 doses. This will be followed by Part 2 in which patients will receive a dose of 3.0 mg/kg every other week for a total of 7 doses. In Part 3, patients will be followed for 12 weeks. No investigational therapy will be administered during this time. At the end of each dosing period, an efficacy assessment will be performed. Safety will be assessed continuously throughout the study.

Following the end of Part 3, patients may be eligible for a potential long-term extension to further refine the dosing regimen, depending upon study drug availability.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

6

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Redwood City, California, United States, 94063
        • Stanford University
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Children's Hospital Colorado

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients must meet all of the following criteria to be eligible for study participation in the three month run in period of the study:

  1. Willing to provide informed consent form, or if 12 to <18 years of age, legal guardian has provided informed consent form and the minor has signed an assent form acknowledging that they understand and agree to study procedures.
  2. Has a diagnosis of RDEB based on genetic analysis and consistent with a recessive inheritance pattern.
  3. Has deficient C7 staining at the dermal-epidermal junction (DEJ) by IF.
  4. Agrees to use contraception as follows:

    For women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) agrees to use highly effective contraceptive (including abstinence) methods from Screening, through the study, and for at least 10 weeks after the last dose of study drug. Non-childbearing potential is defined as a female who meets either of the following criteria: age ≥50 years and no menses for at least 1 year or documented hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or bilateral oophorectomy.

    For males, agrees to use a condom with any WOCBP sexual partner from Day 1 of study treatment, through the study, and at least 10 weeks after the last dose of study drug.

  5. Be willing and able to comply with this protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with any of the following will be excluded from participation in the study:

  1. Has known systemic hypersensitivity to any of the inactive ingredients in PTR-01.
  2. Has previously had an anaphylactic reaction to PTR-01.
  3. Is pregnant or nursing.
  4. Has received in the last six months any investigational gene therapy product or in the last three months any non-gene therapy investigational products.
  5. Is anticipated to receive new regimens of antibiotics or other anti-infectives during the trial.
  6. Has any other medical or personal condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may potentially compromise the safety or compliance of the patient, or may preclude the patient's

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PTR-01 3 mg/kg
All patients will receive a PTR-01 dose of 3.0 mg/kg once weekly every week for a total of 4 doses, followed by a dose of 3.0 mg/kg every other week for a total of 7 doses.
IV recombinant collagen 7 at 3 mg/kg given weekly for 4 doses, followed by bi-weekly for 7 doses
Other Names:
  • Recombinant collagen 7
  • rC7

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wound healing
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Change in a majority of target lesions of at least 2 levels using a 7-point (1-7) Global Impression of Change instrument (7 being the worst)
Up to 162 days
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Safety and tolerability, as assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events
Up to 162 days
Incidence of infusion-associated reactions
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Safety and tolerability, as assessed by infusion-associated reactions (IAR)
Up to 162 days
Incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA)
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Safety and tolerability, as assessed by immunogenicity through anti-drug antibody (ADA) testing
Up to 162 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delivery of PTR-01 to skin
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
PTR-01 incorporation by immunofluorescence using NC1 & NC2 staining, by dose frequency period
Up to 162 days
Formation of anchoring fibrils
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Formation of new anchoring fibrils as measured by electron microscopy
Up to 162 days
Change in wound surface area, as assessed by wound imaging
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Wound area of target lesions, as assessed by wound imaging
Up to 162 days
Change in wound surface area, as assessed by Investigator Global Impression of Change (IGIC)
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Wound area of target lesions, as assessed by IGIC
Up to 162 days
Change in total body wound surface area
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Change in total body wound surface area, using Rule of Nines
Up to 162 days
Change in skin integrity, as assessed by suction blister time
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Change in skin integrity, as assessed by suction blister time
Up to 162 days
Change in skin integrity, as assessed by time to re-blistering
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Change in skin integrity, as assessed by time to re-blistering
Up to 162 days
Change in itch severity, as assessed by modified Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) itch domains
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Severity of itch, as assessed by modified Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) itch domains
Up to 162 days
Change in itch severity, as assessed by the Instrument for Scoring Clinical Outcomes for Research of Epidermolysis Bullosa (iscorEB)
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Severity of itch, as assessed by Instrument for Scoring Clinical Outcomes for Research of Epidermolysis Bullosa (iscorEB), maximum score of 234 (worst)
Up to 162 days
Change in the impact of itch on quality of life
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Change in the impact of itch on quality of life, as assessed by the Pruritus-Specific Quality of Life Instrument (ItchyQoL), maximum score of 110 (worst)
Up to 162 days
Change in pain severity, as assessed by modified Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain domains
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Change in pain severity, as assessed by Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain domains
Up to 162 days
Change in pain severity, as assessed by the Instrument for Scoring Clinical Outcomes for Research of Epidermolysis Bullosa (iscorEB)
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Change in pain severity, as assessed by the Instrument for Scoring Clinical, maximum score of 234 (worst)
Up to 162 days
Change in the impact of pain on quality of life
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Change in the impact of pain on quality of life, as assessed by the Instrument for Scoring Clinical Outcomes for Research of Epidermolysis Bullosa (iscorEB) instrument, maximum score of 234 (worst)
Up to 162 days
Change of dysphagia, as assessed using the Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Change of dysphagia, as assessed using the Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire, maximum score is 40 (worst)
Up to 162 days
Change in dysphagia, as assessed by volume of oral nutritional intake
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Change of dysphagia, as assessed by volume of oral nutritional intake, using patient interview and diary, maximum score is 40 (worst)
Up to 162 days
Stabilization of dysphagia, as assessed using the Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Scale
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Stabilization of dysphagia, as assessed using the Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Scale
Up to 162 days
Stabilization of dysphagia, as assessed by volume oral nutritional intake
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Stabilization of dysphagia, as assessed by volume oral nutritional intake, using patient interview and diary
Up to 162 days
Change in corneal symptoms
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Change of corneal symptoms (eye symptoms), as assessed by the Epidermolysis Bullosa Eye Disease Index (EB-EDI)
Up to 162 days
Stabilization of corneal symptoms
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Stabilization of corneal symptoms (eye symptoms), as assessed by the Epidermolysis Bullosa Eye Disease Index (EB-EDI)
Up to 162 days
Rate of change in nutritional markers (hemoglobin/hematocrit)
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Change of nutritional markers, as assessed by hemoglobin/hematocrit
Up to 162 days
Rate of change in nutritional markers (total protein/albumin)
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Change of nutritional markers, as assessed by total protein/albumin
Up to 162 days
Rate of change in nutritional markers (iron/TIBC)
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Change of nutritional markers, as assessed by iron/TIBC
Up to 162 days
Rate of change in nutritional markers (C-reactive protein)
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Change of nutritional markers, as assessed by C-reactive protein
Up to 162 days
Rate of stabilization of nutritional markers (hemoglobin/hematocrit)
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Stabilization of nutritional markers, as assessed by hemoglobin/hematocrit
Up to 162 days
Rate of stabilization of nutritional markers (total protein/albumin)
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Stabilization of nutritional markers, as assessed by total protein/albumin
Up to 162 days
Rate of stabilization of nutritional markers (iron/TIBC)
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Stabilization of nutritional markers, as assessed by iron/TIBC
Up to 162 days
Rate of stabilization of nutritional markers (C-reactive protein)
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Stabilization of nutritional markers, as assessed by C-reactive protein
Up to 162 days
Change in Investigator Global Impressions of Change (IGIC)
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Global impressions of change, as assessed through IGIC (1-7), 7 being worst
Up to 162 days
Change in Investigator Patient Impressions of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Global impressions of change, as assessed through PGIC (1-7), 7 being worst
Up to 162 days
Change in disease activity and scarring
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Change in disease activity and scarring, as assessed by the Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI)
Up to 162 days
Change in overall quality of life, as assessed by the Quality of Life in Epidermolysis Bullosa (QOLEB) questionnaire
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Change in overall quality of life, as assessed by the Quality of Life in Epidermolysis Bullosa (QOLEB) questionnaire
Up to 162 days
Change in overall health
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Change in overall disability, as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire or Children's Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ/CHAQ)
Up to 162 days
Change in mental health
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Change in mental health and social functioning, as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) mental health domains
Up to 162 days
Change in social function
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Change in mental health and social functioning, as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) social function domains
Up to 162 days
Change in amount of wound care
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Change in amount of wound care, as assessed by patient interviews
Up to 162 days
Change in time for wound care
Time Frame: Up to 162 daysUp to 162 days
Change in time for wound care, as assessed by patient interviews
Up to 162 daysUp to 162 days
Change in cost of wound care
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Change in cost of wound care, as assessed by patient interviews
Up to 162 days
Change in overall patient impression of quality of life
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Change in overall quality of life, as assessed by patient interviews
Up to 162 days
Change in overall patient impression of disability
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Change in overall disability, as assessed by patient interviews
Up to 162 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Genotype/phenotype relationships
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Correlation between genotype (genetic mutation) and severity of disease
Up to 162 days
Impact of pharmacokinetics on safety outcomes
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Correlate Cmax and Area Under the Curve (AUC) with treatment emergent adverse events, infusion associated reactions and immune-mediated reactions
Up to 162 days
Impact of pharmacokinetics on efficacy outcomes
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Correlate Cmax and AUC with wound healing
Up to 162 days
Impact of pharmacokinetics on pharmacodynamic outcomes
Time Frame: Up to 162 days
Correlate Cmax and AUC with suction blister time, C7 immunofluorescence on biopsy and formation of anchoring fibrils by electron microscopy
Up to 162 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 28, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 8, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa

Clinical Trials on PTR-01

3
Subscribe