Tramadol Hydrochnoride as Adjuvant to Local Anesthetic in Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinea Plane Block in Management of Chronic Chest Wall Cancer Pain

July 28, 2021 updated by: Shereen Mamdouh, Assiut University

Effect of Tramadol Hydrochnoride as Adjuvant to Local Anesthetic in Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinea Plane Block in Management of Chronic Chest Wall Cancer Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Chest wall pain is a severe and distressing symptom. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is an interfascial plane block where local anesthetic is injected between the erector spine muscle and the transverse process. It is a simple procedure, with easy sonographic landmarks, for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing thoracic, abdominal, lumbar, and urologic surgery. The ESPB was initially described to relieve chronic pain from metastatic disease and rib fractures.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Chest wall pain is a severe and distressing symptom.Interventional pain management aims to use invasive techniques such as joint injections, nerve blocks and/or neurolysis, neuromodulation, and cement augmentation techniques to diagnose and treat pain syndromes unresponsive to conventional medical management. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is an interfascial plane block where local anesthetic (LA) is injected between the erector spine muscle and the transverse process. It is a simple procedure, with easy sonographic landmarks, for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing thoracic, abdominal, lumbar, and urologic surgery. The ESPB was initially described to relieve chronic pain from metastatic disease and rib fractures.

The ESPB provides blockade of ventral and dorsal ramus from T1-2 to T8-12 with easy insertion of a catheter into the distension induced by the injectate. It is performed away from the pleura and neuraxis, with low risk of complications in these structures.To our knowledge it is the first time study to evaluate the effectiveness of tramadol hydrochloride as adjuvant to local anaesthetic in ultrasound guided ESPB in the management of chronic chest wall cancer pain. Our hypothesis is that tramadol, when added to the local anaesthetic solution injected for ESPB, may improve analgesia and decrease the opioid consumption in patients with chronic chest wall cancer pain

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Rania M Abdelemam, Lectruer
  • Phone Number: 01006523140

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt, 171516
        • Recruiting
        • Assiut University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with persistent chronic chest wall cancer pain (>6 months) with VAS pain score ≥ 5 on 0 to 10 scale despite of medical treatment with tramodine up to 200 mg daily

Exclusion Criteria:

  • they have hypersensitivity to any of the studied drugs,
  • obesity (BMI >35),
  • presence of local pathology such as recurrent cancer or infection at the site of injection,
  • abnormal coagulation profile,
  • an abnormal liver or renal function
  • unable to express their pain or
  • patient refusal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: control group
patients will receive a solution of 28 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% and 2 ml of NaCl 0.9% will be added to the local anesthetic solution divided into two levels of injection T5 and T8 in ipsilateral ESPB
ESPPB will be performed at the T5 and T8 levels of the spine using an in-plane approach. A real-time ultrasound machine will be used to evaluate block performance. A high frequency linear ultrasound probe will be placed longitudinally at a distance of 3 cm from the midline. After identifying the erector spinae muscle and transverse processes, we will insert a 22 G, 100-mm needle after standard skin disinfection. It will be inserted in a caudal-to-cephalad direction using a sterile probe cover until the tip lay in the interfacial plane deep into the erector spinae muscle. This plane will be opened following hydrolocalization with normal saline then 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected slowly, with or without adjuvants, and aspirate every 5 ml to ensure block performance.
Active Comparator: tramadol 50
patients will receive a solution of 28 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% and 2 ml of tramadol hydrochloride 50 mg will be added to the local anesthetic solution divided into two levels of injection T5 and T8 in ipsilateral ESPB.
ESPPB will be performed at the T5 and T8 levels of the spine using an in-plane approach. A real-time ultrasound machine will be used to evaluate block performance. A high frequency linear ultrasound probe will be placed longitudinally at a distance of 3 cm from the midline. After identifying the erector spinae muscle and transverse processes, we will insert a 22 G, 100-mm needle after standard skin disinfection. It will be inserted in a caudal-to-cephalad direction using a sterile probe cover until the tip lay in the interfacial plane deep into the erector spinae muscle. This plane will be opened following hydrolocalization with normal saline then 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected slowly, with or without adjuvants, and aspirate every 5 ml to ensure block performance.
Active Comparator: tramadol 100
patients will receive a solution of 28 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% and 2 ml of tramadol hydrochloride 100 mg will be added to the local anesthetic solution divided into two levels of injection T5 and T8 in ipsilateral ESPB.
ESPPB will be performed at the T5 and T8 levels of the spine using an in-plane approach. A real-time ultrasound machine will be used to evaluate block performance. A high frequency linear ultrasound probe will be placed longitudinally at a distance of 3 cm from the midline. After identifying the erector spinae muscle and transverse processes, we will insert a 22 G, 100-mm needle after standard skin disinfection. It will be inserted in a caudal-to-cephalad direction using a sterile probe cover until the tip lay in the interfacial plane deep into the erector spinae muscle. This plane will be opened following hydrolocalization with normal saline then 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected slowly, with or without adjuvants, and aspirate every 5 ml to ensure block performance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
changes in pain intensity measured by visual analog scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 10 minute after injection, every week for one month after the procedure, 2 month after the procedure
scored from 0 to 10 where 0 = no pain and 10 = the worst pain imaginable
10 minute after injection, every week for one month after the procedure, 2 month after the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
a 7-point Likert- like verbal rating scale
Time Frame: every week for one month after the procedure
extremely dissatisfied = 1, dissatisfied=2, somewhat dissatisfied=3, undecided=4, somewhat satisfied=5, satisfied=6, and extremely satisfied=7.
every week for one month after the procedure
total analgesic requirement
Time Frame: every week for one month after the procedure, 2 month after the procedure
tital amount of analgesia consumed by the patients after the procedure
every week for one month after the procedure, 2 month after the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Erector spinea plane block

3
Subscribe