TIPS Combined With Microwave Ablation in HCC Patients With Refractory Ascites

December 17, 2020 updated by: Zhou Qunfang, Sun Yat-sen University

Feasibility and Clinical Outcome of TIPS Combined With Subsequent Microwave Ablation in HCC Patients With Refractory Ascites

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) could effectively decrease portal hypertension-related complications. This study intends to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TIPS combined with subsequent microwave ablation in HCC patients with refractory ascites.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with refractory ascites (RA) have a very poor prognosis, and there are no effective treatments recommended by the guidelines. TIPS could downgrade the ascites and improve Child-Pugh scores. TIPS has been a common management model for RA for end-stage liver disease. There is no prospective study evaluating TIPS plus thermal ablation. Thus, the investigators carried out this prospective, single-arm study to find out it.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age between 18-70 years
  2. Diagnosis of HCC based on the European Association for the Study of the Liver
  3. Tumor diameter ≤ 3cm
  4. Refractory ascites based on International Ascites Club: (a) intensive diuretics (spironolactone 400 mg/d combined with furosemide 160 mg/d) and sodium-restricted diet (<90 mmoVd) for at least 1 week have no response; (b) lack of response to diuretic therapy; (c) early recurrence of ascites within 4 weeks; (d) Diuretic-induced complications. The grading of ascites was divided into mild ascites, moderate ascites, and large or gross ascites

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Congestive heart failure or severe valvular heart failure
  2. Uncontrolled systemic infection or inflammation
  3. Macroscopic vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis
  4. Severe pulmonary hypertension
  5. Severe renal insufficiency (except hepatogenic renal insufficiency) (6) rapidly progressive liver failure
  6. Diffuse malignant liver tumor
  7. Contrast agent allergy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: TIPS combined with microwave ablation
A needle punctured the portal vein through the transjugular approach. After a successful puncture, the parenchymal tract was dilated, and covered stents (GORE® VIATORR) were introduced. The specifications of the covered stents were 8 mm × 50 mm, 8 mm × 60 mm, 8 mm × 70 mm, and 8 mm × 80 mm. All of the diameters of the bare stents were 8 mm, and the lengths were 50-80 mm. The portal vein pressure was measured before and after shunt creation. After the insertion of TIPS, all of the patients received a diuretic treatment and a salt-limited diet until the ascites disappeared.
MWA: After the patient's ascites disappears, MWA therapy will be performed. A MWA antenna was gradually inserted into the tumor along the predetermined angle under the guidance of Computed Tomography (CT). The whole thermal procedure was conducted under intravenous anesthesia. Vital signs were monitored during the procedure. The settings of the ablation parameters depended upon the manufacturer's recommendation and our experience. Ablation volume was determined by physicians according to liver function, tumor invasion site, and tumor stage. An upper abdominal CT scan was carried out immediately after the procedure to evaluate the ablation area and complications.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: 24 months
the interval from TIPS to death or lost to follow-up
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in Child-Pugh stage
Time Frame: 6 months
the liver function stage change from C to B or from B to A
6 months
change in Child-Pugh scores
Time Frame: 6 months
decrease of Child-pugh scores
6 months
Incidence of hepatic encephalopathy
Time Frame: 24 months
the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy of patients accepting TIPS
24 months
Varices rebleeding rate
Time Frame: 24 months
the incidence of varices bleeding of patients accepting TIPS
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Fei Gao, Professor, Sun Yat-sen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 30, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Diseases

Clinical Trials on Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)

3
Subscribe