Substituting Sitting With Standing and Walking in Free-living Conditions Improves Daily Glucose Profile in South Asians

March 23, 2026 updated by: Dr Daniel Bailey, University of Bedfordshire

Substituting Sitting With Standing and Walking in Free-living Conditions Improves Daily Glucose Concentrations in South Asian Adults Living With Overweight/Obesity

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of substituting sitting under free-living conditions in South Asian adults with overweight and obesity on continuous glucose profiles.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Anthropometric measurement tools, including a stadiometer, a measurement tape and a digital weighing scale, an activity monitor and a Flash Glucose Monitor and sensor, were posted to the participants' home or workplace or the research team dropped all these items at participants' doorstep to allow participants to take their measures including height, weight, and waist circumference.

Participants performed a try-out day of the SITless regimen after preliminary testing and before the first experimental regimen. Participants were only eligible for inclusion if they were able to adhere to the experimental protocol (i.e., substitute a minimum of 5-h/day sitting with ≥2-h of self-perceived light walking and ≥3-h of standing), assessed via monitoring with an activPAL. Participants were provided with a second attempt if required.

After the try-out day, participants were set up with the FGM and activPAL, which were both worn throughout the experimental period. Setup was completed 24-h before the commencement of the first experimental regimen and subsequently worn for 11 days (i.e., 2* 4-day regimens and 3 days washout). Regimen 1 (SIT or SITless) took place over 4 days (day 1-4: Monday to Thursday), followed by a 3-day washout period (day 5-7: Friday to Sunday), followed by regimen 2 (SIT or SITless) for 4 days (day 8-11: Monday to Thursday). Participants were informed of the order of their experimental regimens and provided verbal and written guidance on how to complete the protocols. The experimental regimens were as follows:

  • SIT regimen: Participants were instructed to restrict walking to ≤1 h/day and standing to ≤1 h/day during their waking day. Participants were allowed to perform their daily activities, including cooking and other household activities, within the 2-h of permitted walking and standing.
  • SITless regimen: Participants were instructed to substitute a minimum of 5-h/day sitting with ≥3-h of standing and ≥2-h of self-perceived LPA in addition to interrupting their sitting for 2-5-min every 30-min. A list of activities (including walking at a slow pace, walking on the spot, jumping up and down, and standing) was provided as examples of activities that participants could perform during this regimen. Participants received feedback on their non-sitting time and the number of light and moderate-intensity steps from the try-out day. They were guided towards achieving compliance in this regimen by identifying potential activities they could engage in to interrupt sitting, reviewing their number of sitting interruptions and aiming to accumulate approximately 12,000 steps per day (6,000 steps being equivalent to 1-h of moderate-intensity walking).

Participants were asked to refrain from food and drink containing alcohol for 24-h before and to avoid performing structured exercise for 48-h before the experimental protocol commenced and throughout the entire experimental period (a total of 11-days). A kitchen scale was provided so participants could weigh and record all food and beverage consumption in a diary during the first 4-day regimen and replicate this dietary intake exactly during the second 4-day regimen. Participants were instructed to consume a standardised diet (at least 50% carbohydrate) in order to reduce dietary heterogeneity within the study population. Participants were advised that the meals were spaced evenly throughout the day with 3 to 4-h intervals, with snacks consumed between meals to ensure three distinct and consistent glucose responses across each day.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bedford, United Kingdom, MK41 9EA
        • University of Bedfordshire

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Self-identified South Asian ethnicity.
  • Self-report sitting at least 7 hours per day.
  • Overweight or obese (BMI>23.0 kg/m2)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to speak and read English.
  • Not able to perform light-intensity activities.
  • Diagnosed cardiovascular disease or diabetes.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SIT regimen, then SITless regimen

Firstly, participants performed the SIT regimen (4 days) where they were instructed to restrict walking to ≤1 h/day and standing to ≤1 h/day during their waking day. Participants were allowed to perform their daily activities, including cooking and other household activities, within the 2-h of permitted walking and standing. After a washout period of 3 days, they then performed the SITless regimen (4 days).

SIT regimen: See SIT regimen arm description SITless regimen: See SITless regimen arm description

See SIT regimen arm description
Experimental: SITless regimen, then SIT regimen

Firstly, participants performed the SITLess regimen (4 days) where they were instructed to substitute a minimum of 5-h/day sitting with ≥3-h of standing and ≥2-h of self-perceived LPA in addition to interrupting their sitting for 2-5-min every 30-min. A list of activities (including walking at a slow pace, walking on the spot, jumping up and down, and standing) was provided as examples of activities that particpants could perform during this regimen. After a washout period of 3 days, they then performed the SIT regimen (4 days).

SITless regimen: See SITless regimen arm description SIT regimen: See SIT regimen arm description

See SITless regimen arm description

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Glycaemia
Time Frame: Mean net incremental area under the curve for waking hours (16 h) interstitial glucose concentration per day for 4 valid days during each intervention

Net incremental area under the curve (iAUC), calculated by subtracting waking glucose concentration for each day from the total AUC. Waking hours were identified individually for each participant from activPAL data and then normalised to a 16 h day.

Each of these variables was calculated as the mean of valid days within each regimen. A minimum of one valid day that coincided with both FGM and activPAL data was required in each experimental regimen for inclusion in the analysis.

Mean net incremental area under the curve for waking hours (16 h) interstitial glucose concentration per day for 4 valid days during each intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sitting Time
Time Frame: Mean total sitting time per day for 4 valid days during each intervention

Total sitting time was measured 24 h/day during each activity regimen using an activPAL3 activity monitor. ActivPAL3 data were processed using ProcessingPAL software. After an automated estimate of valid data using the valid wear criteria, ProcessingPAL summary outputs variables were produced in a Microsoft Excel sheet.

A minimum of one valid day that coincided with both FGM and activPAL data was required in each experimental regimen for inclusion in the analysis.

Mean total sitting time per day for 4 valid days during each intervention
Standing Time
Time Frame: Mean standing time per day for 4 valid days during each intervention

Physical activity patterns was measured 24 h/day during each activity regimen using an activPAL3 activity monitor. ActivPAL3 data was processed using ProcessingPAL software. After an automated estimate of valid data using the valid wear criteria, ProcessingPAL summary outputs variables were produced in a Microsoft Excel sheet.

A minimum of one valid day that coincided with both FGM and activPAL data was required in each experimental regimen for inclusion in the analysis.

Mean standing time per day for 4 valid days during each intervention
Total Stepping Time
Time Frame: Mean total stepping time per day for 4 valid days during each intervention

Physical activity patterns were measured 24 h/day during each activity regimen using an activPAL3 activity monitor. ActivPAL3 data were processed using ProcessingPAL software. After an automated estimate of valid data using the valid wear criteria, ProcessingPAL summary outputs variables were produced in a Microsoft Excel sheet.

A minimum of one valid day that coincided with both FGM and activPAL data was required in each experimental regimen for inclusion in the analysis.

Mean total stepping time per day for 4 valid days during each intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kamalesh DEY, PhD, University of Bedfordshire

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 19, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on SIT regimen

Subscribe