Modulation of an Experimental Prolonged Pain Model Using High Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

December 1, 2020 updated by: Sebastian Kold Sørensen, Aalborg University
The purpose of this double-blinded, parallel group randomized controlled trial is to investigate the effects of high definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on an experimental prolonged pain model in healthy subjects.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

The purpose of this double-blinded, parallel group randomized controlled trial is to investigate the effects of high definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on an experimental prolonged pain model in healthy subjects. Forty healthy participants are administered the compound Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) in the right first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI), which produced prolonged muscle soreness and hyperalgesia.

The forty participants are randomly allocated to either the control group receiving a Sham-tDCS paradigm, or the intervention group receiving three consecutive days of multimodal HD-tDCS targeting primary motor cortex (M1) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) simultaneously.

The somatosensory profile is assessed at baseline, before administration of NGF as well as prior and post each HD-tDCS session using standardised quantitative sensory testing.

It is hypothesised that the active HD-tDCS will modulate the neurological changes induced by the experimental pain condition, which will alleviate the hyperalgesia and hypersensitivity.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Sebastian Kold, MSc
  • Phone Number: +4522850345
  • Email: sks@hst.aau.dk

Study Locations

    • Nordjylland
      • Aalborg, Nordjylland, Denmark, 9000
        • Recruiting
        • Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain
        • Contact:
          • Thomas Graven-Nielsen, Prof.
          • Phone Number: +45 2216 049
          • Email: tgn@hst.aau.dk

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy men and women.
  • Able to speak, read and understand English or Danish.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Drug addiction defined as the use of cannabis, opioids or other drugs
  • Current use of opioids, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines
  • Previous or current neurological, musculoskeletal, rheumatic, malignant, inflammatory or mental illnesses
  • Current or prior chronic pain conditions
  • Lack of ability to cooperate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Active tDCS
Both groups will receive an injection with 5 μg (0.5 ml) Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) in the first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI muscle) prior to the HD-tDCS intervention. This injection a pain model, that is intended to induce muscle soreness and hyperalgesia.
Using the Starstim 32, HD-tDCS equipment we provide 20 minutes of 2 mA anodal multimodal stimulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and primary motor cortex simultaneously using ring-cathode configurations around the two anodes.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Sham tDCS
Both groups will receive an injection with 5 μg (0.5 ml) Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) in the first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI muscle) prior to the HD-tDCS intervention. This injection a pain model, that is intended to induce muscle soreness and hyperalgesia.

Using the Starstim 32, HD-tDCS equipment we provide sham stimulation with 30 seconds of ramping up to 2 mA intensity, then turning off for 19 minutes and then ramping down from 2 mA intensity to 0 in the last 30 seconds.

This sham-configuration is intended to mimic the sensory experience of active HD-tDCS.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pressure pain threshold.
Time Frame: Six assessments over three days: Baseline is assessed before any intervention at day one, and then the pain thresholds are assessed before and after each intervention on the subsequent two days.
A hand-held pressure algometer (Somedic, Hörby, Sweden) with a 1-cm2 probe will be used to record the pressure pain threshold. The pressure is increased gradually at a rate of 20 kPa/s. The measurement is repeated three times on the first dorsal interosseous muscle.
Six assessments over three days: Baseline is assessed before any intervention at day one, and then the pain thresholds are assessed before and after each intervention on the subsequent two days.
Change in pressure pain tolerance.
Time Frame: Six assessments over three days: Baseline is assessed before any intervention at day one, and then the pain thresholds are assessed before and after each intervention on the subsequent two days.
A hand-held pressure algometer (Somedic, Hörby, Sweden) with a 1-cm2 probe will be used to record the pressure pain threshold at baseline. The pressure is increased gradually at a rate of 20 kPa/s. The measurement is repeated three times on the first dorsal interosseous muscle. The participant is asked to rate the pain on a numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0-10. 0 representing no pain at all, and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable.
Six assessments over three days: Baseline is assessed before any intervention at day one, and then the pain thresholds are assessed before and after each intervention on the subsequent two days.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in tactile detection threshold
Time Frame: Six assessments over three days: Baseline is assessed before any intervention at day one, and then the sensory thresholds are assessed before and after each intervention on the subsequent two days.
Tactile threshold will be measured using an anaesthesiometer consisting of a set of Von Frey filaments. The filaments are made of nylon fibre of various diameters so as to provide a range of forces of up to 300 grams. The minimum force that the subject can detect will be identified. This will be assessed on flexor carpi radialis on the right hand arm.
Six assessments over three days: Baseline is assessed before any intervention at day one, and then the sensory thresholds are assessed before and after each intervention on the subsequent two days.
Change in mechanical pain threshold
Time Frame: Six assessments over three days: Baseline is assessed before any intervention at day one, and then the sensory thresholds are assessed before and after each intervention on the subsequent two days.
Mechanical pain threshold (MPT) will be measured using a set of weighted pinprick stimulators with a flat contact area of 0.25 mm diameter that exert forces between 8 and 512 mN. Threshold procedures will use a method of limits with up to five series of ascending and descending stimulus intensities. This will be assessed on flexor carpi radialis on the right hand arm.
Six assessments over three days: Baseline is assessed before any intervention at day one, and then the sensory thresholds are assessed before and after each intervention on the subsequent two days.
Change in conditioned pain modulation (CPM)
Time Frame: Three assessments over three days: Baseline is assessed before the stimulation at day one, and then again after the stimulation on the two subsequent days.

A computer-controlled cuff pressure algometer (Nocitech, Denmark) with an air-filled tourniquet cuff (VBM, Germany) will be used to record cuff pressure-induced pain thresholds over the muscle bulk on the calfs. The pressure is increased gradually at a rate of 1 kPa/s to assess pain tolerance on a 0-10 VAS scale, where 0 is no pain at all and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.

During CPM testing, the pain tolerance is first assessed on one leg marking the baseline. The pressure pain tolerance is then assessed on the same leg again, while the contralateral calf is applied a simultaneous painful pressure stimulus. The outcome of the CPM testing is the difference in pressure pain tolerance measured in kPA between the first and the second assessment. The larger the positive difference is between the baseline and the second assessment, the stronger CPM effect the subject has.

Three assessments over three days: Baseline is assessed before the stimulation at day one, and then again after the stimulation on the two subsequent days.
Change in temporal summation of pain (TSP).
Time Frame: Three assessments over three days: Baseline is assessed before the stimulation at day one, and then again after the stimulation on the two subsequent days.
TSP will be applied using cuff pressure algometry. A total of 10 repeated mechanical pressure stimuli will be delivered at 0.5 Hz (1-s stimuli duration and 1-s interval between stimuli) to the test area. During the 10 repeated stimuli, subjects will continuously rate the pain intensity on a 10-cm continuous VAS. TSP is assessed on the calf of the right leg.
Three assessments over three days: Baseline is assessed before the stimulation at day one, and then again after the stimulation on the two subsequent days.
Change in electroencephalography response (EEG).
Time Frame: Three assessments over three days: The EEG will be recorded as a part of the HD-tDCS intervention.

EEG will be recorded for four minutes prior to the HD-tDCS, during the HD-tDCS and four minutes immediately after the HD-tDCS. In the four minutes before and after HD-tDCS, the subject will have their eyes open for two minutes and their eyes closed for two minutes.

The EEG data will be analyzed with a focus on the resting state. In particular the Alpha frequency brain waves are of interest, but exploratory analysis will be conducted on the Beta, Theta and Gamma frequency bands as well.

Three assessments over three days: The EEG will be recorded as a part of the HD-tDCS intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas Graven-Nielsen, Prof., Aalborg University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 29, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Active HD-tDCS

3
Subscribe