Accuracy and Reproducibility of Virtually Guided Minimally Invasive Tooth Preparations Using Reverse Engineering

November 27, 2020 updated by: yara attia, Alexandria University

Accuracy and Reproducibility of Virtually Guided Minimally Invasive Tooth Preparations Using Reverse Engineering (Controlled Clinical Trial)

The aim of the study is to assess and reproduce standardized virtually guided minimally invasive tooth preparations using digitally designed occlusal template, compared to its reference virtual preparation using a computer aided 3-dimensional (3-D) analysis, and to investigate the effect of these preparations on absolute marginal discrepancy of 3 unit monolithic translucent zirconia FPD using a computer aided 3-D analysis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Ten patients with missing mandibular first molar will receive a three-unit full contour monolithic zirconia FPD. Each patient case will receive two modes of preparation as in the previous in-vitro study: virtually guided tooth preparation using occlusal resin template to assist the intraoral preparation and the reference virtual tooth preparation. Each participant's preparation will be evaluated using diagnostic dental software and will be compared to a reference digital virtual preparation using 3-D mesh processing reverse engineering metrology software.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Alexandria, Egypt, 21527
        • Recruiting
        • Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a missing lower first mandibular molar.
  • Good oral hygiene with no signs of periapical pathology or periodontal disease (periodontal screening index 0-1) and with compliance to perform strict oral hygiene measures.
  • Well-aligned abutment teeth with similar mesio-distal (M-D) and bucco-lingual (B- L) dimensions; (2nd premolar: M-D 7.8 mm ±1, B-L 8.7 mm ±1), (2nd molar: M-D 10.73±1, B-L 10.5 mm ±1).
  • Abutment teeth with an adequate occluso-gingival height where (2nd premolar: 8.4 mm ±1, 2nd molar 7mm ±1), and adequate edentulous span length (9.5 mm±1); for an appropriate connector area of at least 9 mm.
  • Absence of parafunctional habits (clinching, bruxism).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bad oral hygiene.
  • Advanced periodontitis, gingivitis, or recession.
  • Abutments with subgingival restorations, root caries.
  • Parafunctional habits.
  • Undergoing orthodontic treatment.
  • Obvious dentition malalignment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Virtually guided minimally invasive preparation
Intraoral virtually guided minimally invasive design with an occlusal reduction of 1.5mm, axial reduction will be performed with 6 degrees axial taper and a circumferential chamfer margin of 0.5mm in width and 0.5mm coronal to the gingival margin. A milled guiding occlusal resin template of the teeth will be checked for fitting then fixed using spot etching and will be used to guide the amount of axial reductions and taper degree.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of the virtually guided tooth preparation accuracy
Time Frame: 1 month
Each scan data of virtually guided preparations will be uploaded to a 3D mesh processing reverse engineering software, then superimposed against the reference virtual preparation using the software's best fit matching algorithm tool. Superimposed 3D data files will be sectioned into 5 different 2D planes: buccolingual, mesiodistal, transverse occlusal, transverse middle, and transverse gingival. Differences will be assessed both qualitatively and quantitively to measure deviations. Quantitative assessment will be expressed with a sign: (+) indicating external deviation or (-) indicating internal deviation. The deviation (+ or -) will be numerically described with mean and standard deviation. Qualitative assessment will be through a color-coded mapping of superimposed images where discrepancies between each test specimen and reference file will be expressed with yellow range of color lines indicating external deviations and cyan range of color lines indicating internal deviations
1 month
3-D Evaluation of absolute marginal discrepancy using reverse engineering
Time Frame: 1 month
Four scans will be performed using a calibrated laboratory scanner: each 3D printed master cast with 2 preparations designs, external & intaglio surfaces of monolithic zirconia 3-unit FPDs, monolithic zirconia 3-unit FPDs after it has been seated on each preparation design. The 3D point clouds of all 4 scans will be obtained in STL format. The 3D data of the FPD retainers will be registered to the data obtained from the external surface of the crown using registration module in reverse engineering software. The 3D data of the virtual seating of the intaglio & external surfaces on the preparations will be obtained & margins of the FPD retainers & preparations will be extracted. The software's construct cross-sectional cloud circular command to divide the preparation evenly into curves. Every curve will intersect with the outer edge of the ceramic retainer & margin design of the preparation at 2 points. Distance between these 2 points will be recorded (absolute marginal discrepancy)
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yara H Attia, M.Sc, Faculty of Dentistry, Fayoum University, Egypt
  • Study Director: Samir I Bakry, PhD, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
  • Study Director: Sanaa H Abd El Kader, PhD, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Marginal Adaptation of Fixed Dental Prosthesis

Clinical Trials on Virtually guided minimally invasive preparation

3
Subscribe