Genicular Artery Embolization Vs Observation for Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis (GRAVITY)

August 29, 2023 updated by: Siddharth Padia, MD, University of California, Los Angeles

GRAVITY: Genicular Artery Embolization Versus Observation for the Treatment of Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this clinical trial is to determine whether genicular artery embolization (GAE) is an effective way to treat knee pain from osteoarthritis. Pain from arthritis is often due to underlying inflammation in the joint. The inflammation is associated with increased abnormal blood flow going to the specific area of pain. If the investigator can reduce the blood flow, the inflammation can be reduced and the pain can be controlled.

The GAE procedure is an experimental procedure to decrease the blood flow (embolize) to the specific region of the knee that is causing the pain. This will be done by infusing microscopic spheres into the specific blood vessel (genicular artery) supplying the area of pain in the knee. This is done through a procedure which is called an angiogram, which is done entirely through a pinhole at the creased of the thigh, using twilight (conscious) sedation.

The investigators have already completed an initial trial at UCLA, and shown that this procedure is safe and effective. The purpose of this new trial is to compare outcomes of people undergoing the GAE procedure to those who do not undergo the procedure. A total of 100 patients will be enrolled, and 2/3 of the patients will be randomly selected to undergo the GAE procedure. 1/3 will not undergo the procedure. This is known as a randomized trial. During the trial, all subjects will also get MRIs and fluid withdrawn from their knee joints at various timepoints in order to precisely figure out how the procedure works on a closer (microscopic) level.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a single-center, prospective, open-label randomized trial to compare outcomes of GAE versus observation, and to identify biomarkers and imaging endpoints that change in response to GAE.

Subjects will be considered enrolled in the study once they have provided informed consent and have been determined to meet all eligibility criteria. A total of 100 subjects will be enrolled in the double-arm study and will be followed for 24 months.

The study will involve a screening period in which patient eligibility is determined. Once eligibility is confirmed, subjects will then be randomized to GAE or observation in a 2:1 ratio. Group sample sizes of 67 and 33 achieve approximately 85% power to reject the null hypothesis of no difference in the clinical response defined by 50% or greater reduction in WOMAC between the treatment and observation arms with a significance level (alpha) of 0.050 using a two-sided two-proportions using Fisher's exact test. With 100 symptomatic knee osteoarthritis subjects, the power of study is approximately 85% where we assume a target response rate of 67.5% for the experimental arm and 31% for the observational arm with up to 20% drop-out rate prior to 6 months. All study subjects will undergo the initial procedures, consisting of a history and physical exam, dynamic contrast-enhanced knee MRI, blood serum and joint aspiration with biochemical analysis.

For the treatment arm, subjects will undergo GAE with Embozene microspheres (100 micron) (Varian Medical Systems). Observation group will not receive the GAE procedure at baseline, and will be counseled on conservative management with a referral or prescription for physical therapy. Follow-up visits will be at 1 month (± 2 weeks), 3 months (± 2 weeks), 6 months (± 2 weeks), 12 months (± 2 weeks), and 24 months (± 2 weeks) post-procedure. At these visits, subjects will complete the WOMAC, KOOS5, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, undergo a directed physical examination, and report any new adverse events (AEs). At 6 and 24 months of follow-up, all subjects will also undergo dynamic contrast-enhanced knee MRI, and serum and joint aspiration with biochemical analysis.

At 6 months, subjects in the observation group will have the option to crossover to the GAE treatment arm. Subjects in the crossover group will then undergo GAE, with follow up at 1 month (± 2 weeks), 3 months (± 2 weeks), 6 months (± 2 weeks), 12 months (± 2 weeks), and 24 months (± 2 weeks) post-GAE. For the purposes of data analyses, the follow-up evaluations for crossover subjects will match those of the initial GAE subjects. For example, if a subject in the observation arm undergoes GAE crossover at 6 months, that will be considered the treatment visit, and then subject will undergo evaluation at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after GAE.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • California
      • Santa Monica, California, United States, 90404
        • Recruiting
        • UCLA Santa Monica Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria

Subjects must meet all of the following inclusion criteria in order to be eligible for this study:

  • Provided informed consent
  • Age ≥ 40 years and less than 80 years
  • Ineligibility for or refusal of surgical management
  • Moderate-severe knee pain as determined by visual analog scale > 5 out of 10
  • Osteoarthritis based on X-ray. Kellgren-Lawrence score > 2 based on radiograph completed within 3 months of procedure date.
  • Resistant/failed conservative treatment (e.g. NSAIDS/physical therapy/steroid joint injection/ hyaluronic acid joint injection) for at least 3 months
  • Able to comply with all treatments and protocol follow-up visits

Exclusion Criteria

Subjects that meet any of the following exclusion criteria will not be eligible for this study:

  • Mild knee pain as determined by visual analog scale < 5 out of 10
  • OA on knee radiograph resulting in greater than 20 degree varus or valgus angulation
  • Moderate loss of kidney function, define as estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 45 mL/min.
  • Significant arterial atherosclerosis that would limit selective angiography
  • History of fibromyalgia, autoimmune, or inflammatory disorder
  • History of any lumbar spine surgery, spine injections, or radicular pain in the extremity believed to originate from the spine
  • Allergy to iodinated contrast agents
  • Active Infection or malignancy
  • Recent (within 12 months) or active cigarette use
  • Prior total or partial knee replacement in the subject knee
  • Active pregnancy
  • Uncorrectable bleeding diasthesis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: GAE Treatment
Subjects will be treated with a genicular artery embolization (GAE) procedure performed with Embozene Microspheres. The microspheres will be delivered in a saline-contrast medium solution and will be delivered to the arteries supplying the areas of the subject's pain.
Embozene is a medical device made by Boston Scientific approved in the United States for the treatment of hypervascular tumors and arteriovenous malformations. It consists of thousands of microscopic spheres that are injected into the artery in the knee going to the region of pain. One of the causes of pain in the setting of knee arthritis is increased blood flow going to the specific area of pain. The goal of this procedure is to decrease the blood flow (embolize) to the specific region of the knee that is causing your pain. This is done by infusing Embozene particles into the specific blood vessel (genicular artery) supplying the area of pain in the knee.
Other Names:
  • Color-Advanced Microspheres
  • Microspheres for Embolization
No Intervention: Observational

Subjects randomized to the observational group will not undergo the experimental GAE Treatment.

PI will offer subjects enrolled into the observational group to crossover to the experimental GAE Treatment group after they have completed their 6-month follow-up assessments.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in clinical response
Time Frame: 6 months
The primary evaluation is the change in clinical response, measured by The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). The primary endpoint is percentage of subjects achieving at least a 50% reduction in WOMAC at 6 months with an intent-to-treat analysis.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short term clinical outcomes
Time Frame: 1 and 3 months
• Compare clinical success rates (defined as at least 50% reduction in WOMAC) between GAE and observation at 1 and 3 months. This will be a intent-to-treat analysis.
1 and 3 months
Clinic outcomes at multiple timepoints
Time Frame: 1-24 months
• Compare clinical success rates (defined as at least 50% reduction in WOMAC) between GAE and observation at various timepoints: 1 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months. This will be a per-protocol analysis.
1-24 months
Degree of change in clinical outcomes via WOMAC
Time Frame: 1-24 months
• Compare median decrease in WOMAC (measured by percentage) between GAE and observation at various timepoints: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months. This will be a per-protocol analysis.
1-24 months
Decrease in pain
Time Frame: 1-24 months
• Compare median decrease in pain (measured by VAS: visual analog scale) between GAE and observation at various timepoints: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months. This will be a per-protocol analysis.
1-24 months
Change in quality of life
Time Frame: 1-24 months
• Compare median improvement in health-related quality of life (measured by KOOS5) between GAE and observation at various timepoints: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months. This will be a per-protocol analysis.
1-24 months
Change in MRI
Time Frame: 6-24 months
• To assess changes in imaging (MRI) in patients undergoing GAE versus observation, at 0, 6, and 24 months. This will be a per-protocol exploratory analysis.
6-24 months
Change in inflammatory biomarkers
Time Frame: 6-24 months
• To assess changes in inflammatory markers in patients undergoing GAE versus observation at 0, 6 and 24 months. This will be a per-protocol exploratory analysis.
6-24 months
Correlation of baseline characteristics with clinical response
Time Frame: 1-24 months
• To assess how differences in baseline clinical, imaging, and biochemical characteristics correlate with clinical response. This will be a per-protocol exploratory analysis.
1-24 months
Degree of progression of osteoarthritis
Time Frame: 24 months
• To assess the degree of progression of osteoarthritis via changes in knee radiograph at 0 and 24 months in patients undergoing GAE versus observation. This will be a per-protocol exploratory analysis.
24 months
Safety assessment
Time Frame: 24 months
Assess safety via tabulation of adverse events
24 months
Pain medication use
Time Frame: 24 months
To assess change in pain medication use after GAE versus observation.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Siddharth A Padia, MD, University of California, Los Angeles

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 24, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Embozene MicroSpheres

3
Subscribe