Quality of Life of Colorectal Cancer Screenees in the Period Between Colonoscopy and Next Clinic Visit for Final Report: Does Real-time Endoscopic Optical Diagnosis Improve Their Quality of Life

December 23, 2020 updated by: Chen-Ya Kuo, Fu Jen Catholic University
Colorectal cancer screening program has been proven to reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality and is cost-effective. It has been adopted by most countries in the world, and colonoscopy is regarded as the most accurate test for detecting colorectal neoplasm. After screenees underwent colonoscopy, most endoscopists do not routinely explain the preliminary optical diagnosis to the subjects before they going home, which may cause unnecessary anxiety and may reduce the quality of life of the subjects before acquiring the final results. In recent years, endoscopic optical diagnostic technology has been validated by meta-analysis studies as an excellent tool to predict the histology of colorectal polyps and to differentiate the invasion depth of colorectal cancer. The real time feature of endoscopic optical diagnosis allows endoscopists to explain the preliminary results confidently to the subjects immediately after colonoscopy, which is expected to reduce the anxiety of the subjects before they acquired the final results and improve their quality of life. We designed a randomized controlled trial to validate whether real-time endoscopic optical diagnosis could decrease the anxiety burden and improve the quality of life for colorectal-cancer screenees after colonoscopy.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • New Taipei City, Taiwan, 24352
        • Recruiting
        • Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who preparing to received screening or surveillance colonoscopy under general anesthesia.
  • Patients who preparing to received sedated colonoscopy due to other GI tract related symptoms.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Impaired mental status that could not understand the questionnaire questions.
  • Patients with major psychological disorders.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
NO_INTERVENTION: Standard-of-care group
Participants in this group received their colonoscopic and pathological diagnosis simultaneously at next clinical visit, which arranged in 1 to 2 weeks later.
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention group
Participants in this group received their colonoscopic diagnosis right after they awake from general anesthesia, and then received pathological diagnosis at next clinical visit, which arranged in 1 to 2 weeks later.
Colonoscopic optical diagnosis by image enhanced technology has been validated as an excellent tool to predict the histology of colorectal polyps and to differentiate the invasion depth of colorectal cancer.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life degree
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Use WHOQOL-BREF Taiwanese version to measure the quality of life between the two study arms.
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety and depression degree
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Use Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Taiwanese version to measure the anxiety and depression degree between the two study arms.
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

December 22, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 31, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 24, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Real-time colonoscopic optical diagnosis for colorectal neoplasm

3
Subscribe