Comparison of Dry Needling and Dry Cupping in Positional Fault of Pelvis

August 27, 2021 updated by: Riphah International University

Comparison of Dry Needling and Dry Cupping in Positional Fault of Pelvis Due to Myofascial Trigger Points in Quadratus Lumborum

This project was a Randomized clinical trial conducted to Compare the effects of dry needling and dry cupping in Positional fault of pelvis due to Myofascial trigger points in Quadratus Lumborum so that we can have best treatment option for patients with myofascial trigger points.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Non Probability Convenient sampling was done. Patients following eligibility criteria from Physiotherapy department of Islam Central hospital, Sialkot were considered. Sample size was calculated with Epitool calculator. 26 Participants were randomly allocated in two groups equally via convenient sampling method. Baseline assessment was done initially. Group A was given Dry needling technique and Group B was given Dry Cupping along with conventional physiotherapy treatment (hot pack and stretching). Duration of research was almost 6 months. Participants were treated 6 times over a 3 week period with 2 treatment sessions per week per patient. Pre and Post treatment readings were taken in 1st and 6th session over a 3 week period respectively. A follow up reading was also taken after 1 month for checking prolonged post treatment effects. Assessment was done via Pressure pain threshold Scale, Pelvic goniometer and Measuring tape for assessing functional positional fault of pelvis and muscle length of Quadratus Lumborum. All participants were provided written informed consent prior to commencement of the procedures. They were free to quit the treatment at any stage of research. Data was analyzed by using SPSS version 23.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lahore, Pakistan, 54000
        • Riphah IU

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • On palpation the presence of at least 1 active trigger point in quadratus lumborum. So the patient presents with low back pain.
  • Patients presents with positional fault of pelvis (lateral tilt)(4).
  • Patients having chronic Low Back Pain for at least more than 6 months(3).
  • Patients agree to get treatment sessions for the research work.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants should not have taken any medications like analgesics, anti-coagulants, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or muscle relaxants during this study or even 3 days before this study.
  • Participants should not have received any other treatment for the pain management, because it will affect the results of the study.
  • Patients with bleeding disorders, local or systemic infection, acute muscle trauma.
  • Patients with comorbid conditions.
  • Patients with severe physical disability and true leg length discrepancy(1).
  • Pregnant females

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dry needling
Dry needling, hot pack, stretching exercises.
Experimental group 1 got this intervention containing Dry needling for 10 mins, followed by conventional physiotherapy treatment (hot pack and stretching) for 15 mins. Participants were treated 6 times over a 3 week period with 2 treatment sessions per week per patient. Pre and Post treatment readings were taken in 1st and 6th session over a 3 week period respectively. A follow up reading was also taken after 1 month for checking prolonged post treatment effects. Assessment was done via Pressure pain threshold Scale, Pelvic goniometer and Measuring tape for assessing functional positional fault of pelvis and muscle length of Quadratus lumborum
Experimental: Dry Cupping
Dry cupping, hot pack, stretching exercises.
Experimental group 2 got this intervention containing Dry cupping for 10 mins, followed by conventional physiotherapy treatment (hot pack and stretching) for 15 mins. Participants were treated 6 times over a 3 week period with 2 treatment sessions per week per patient. Pre and Post treatment readings were taken in 1st and 6th session over a 3 week period respectively. A follow up reading was also taken after 1 month for checking prolonged post treatment effects. Assessment was done via Pressure pain threshold Scale, Pelvic goniometer and Measuring tape for assessing functional positional fault of pelvis and muscle length of Quadratus Lumborum

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain by 'Pressure Pain Algometer'
Time Frame: Baseline, 6th session(at 3rd week), follow up session after 1 month
Change in Pain from baseline was checked at 6th session by Pressure Pain Algometer. A follow up reading was also taken after 1 month for checking prolonged post treatment effects.
Baseline, 6th session(at 3rd week), follow up session after 1 month
Change in Range of Motion of lumbar spine side flexion by 'Goniometer'
Time Frame: Baseline, 6th session(at 3rd week), follow up session after 1 month
Change in ROM from baseline was measured at 6th session. A follow up reading was taken after 1 month for checking prolonged post treatment effects. A goniometer is a device that measures an angle or permits rotation of an object to a definite position
Baseline, 6th session(at 3rd week), follow up session after 1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pain by 'Numeric Pain Rating Scale'
Time Frame: Baseline, 6th session(at 3rd week), follow up session after 1 month
Change in pain from baseline was measured at 6th session. A follow up reading was taken after 1 month for checking prolonged post treatment effects. The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is an 11 point pain scale that is completed by a patient himself, under the supervision of researcher.
Baseline, 6th session(at 3rd week), follow up session after 1 month
Change in Range of Motion of lumbar side flexion by Measuring tape
Time Frame: Baseline, 6th session(at 3rd week), follow up session after 1 month
Change in ROM from baseline was measured at 6th session. A follow up reading was taken after 1 month for checking prolonged post treatment effects. The method for using a tape measure to examine lateral flexion of the spine has been introduced in the literature.
Baseline, 6th session(at 3rd week), follow up session after 1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 30, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • REC/Lhr/20/0101 Huma Akhtar

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myofascial Trigger Point Pain

Clinical Trials on Dry needling

3
Subscribe