ENO Breathe vs Usual Care in COVID-19 Recovery (SHIELD ENO)

November 22, 2021 updated by: Imperial College London

A Randomised Controlled Trial of the English National Opera Breathe Programme Compared With Usual Care in People Recovering From COVID-19

A randomised clinical trial to assess the impact of an online singing, breathing and wellbeing programme (ENO Breathe) developed specifically for people recovering from COVID-19.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND:

ENO Breathe is a breathing and wellbeing programme developed specifically for people recovering from COVID-19, who are still suffering from breathlessness and associated anxiety. Delivered by ENO in collaboration with Imperial College Healthcare teams entirely online, the programme focuses on breathing re-training through singing. Initial evaluation of the project suggested health improvements related to participation, however, a properly conducted efficacy study is needed.

DESIGN: An assessor blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial, to assess the effects of ENO Breathe compared to usual care on health status. The study will also evaluate the impact on respiratory symptoms, anxiety, depression, and breathlessness perception to investigate the mechanisms involved.

RESEARCH QUESION AND OUTCOME MEASURES:

The primary outcome will be change in health status, assessed using the RAND-36 tool (RAND SF-36), comparing ENO Breathe and Usual Care arms.

Additional endpoints will be: the COPD assessment test score (CAT), 0-100 Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) for breathlessness (at rest, walking around the house, climbing stairs, and running), Dyspnoea-12, anxiety (GAD-7), and depression (PHQ-9).

Assessments: The outcomes outlined above will be recorded at baseline prior to randomisation, and then repeated after 6 weeks.

POPULATION: Adult patients recovering from COVID-19 will be recruited from specialist COVID-19 clinics, where participants will have been fully assessed and investigated by referring healthcare professionals. Participants in the active arm will attend once weekly ENO online workshop sessions for 6 weeks, and have access to bespoke online digital resources, designed to support participants between sessions. The comparison arm will receive usual care. Randomization will be 1:1.

SAMPLE SIZE Sample size: Based on pilot data in people with COPD, where the standard deviation (SD) for change in SF-36 was 15 points, to identify a clinically relevant 10 point difference in SF-36 responses at a 0.05 level of significance with a 90% power would require 48 patients in each treatment arm. Allowing for 20% dropout, we will therefore recruit 120 patients.

Primary analysis will be on an intention to treat basis. Change in parameters will be assessed comparing ENO Breathe and Usual Care, using Generalised Linear Models to estimate treatment effects. In order to better understand changes in the RAND-36 "anchor measure", the investigator will relate this to changes in measures of anxiety, depression, breathlessness, and other respiratory symptoms.

An additional responder analysis will compare the proportion in each treatment arm achieving a clinically important (10%) improvement in RAND-36 scores.

Update 21 JUNE 2021

To calculate the sample size, pilot data from a singing-based intervention in COPD, (considered the most relevant data available at study inception) was used, as outlined above, where the researchers aimed to recruit 120 patients. Data subsequently became available from ENO Breathe participants that rook part in the program prior to the research study, in which the SD was 8 for change in SF-36 scores. We have also decided using an MCID of 5 for the SF-36 is more appropriate, as this is not specific to a particular medical condition. As such, a total sample of 108 participants is required, using 1 to 1 study arm allocation. Allowing for 30% dropout, which is more appropriate, 158 participants will be recruited. Additionally, as a higher than expected number of participants were considered, study withdrawals due to be unable to attend the session times they were allocated, or despite meeting inclusion criteria, 1-to-1 meeting with the session leaders highlighted issues related excessive fatigue precipitated by exertion, so were not deemed appropriate at that point in time. As such, the researchers will also conduct a modified intention to treat analysis including all participants who were randomised and were deemed appropriate to participate following their 1-to-1. This consideration had not been included in the original exclusion criteria, due to limited awareness of its relevance at that time. These changes have been made, and here documented, before any baseline data has been sent to the analysis team, and before any follow up data has been collected.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

153

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, SW3 6NP
        • National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults recovering from COVID-19 with ongoing breathlessness and/or anxiety.
  • Referred from a specialist COVID-19 clinics aligned with the project, after appropriate clinical evaluation and investigation
  • Internet access with appropriate device (e.g. computer or tablet)

Exclusion Criteria:

- Unable to participate due to comorbidity (e.g. life limiting illness, cognitive impairment)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ENO Breathe group
Participation in the online ENO Breathe programme for 6 weeks.
Six weekly group online workshop sessions, led by an ENO vocal specialist. Workshops will encourage participants to take part in exercises and activities especially designed to support breathing control, providing tools for self-management of breath and anxiety. They will also have access to bespoke online digital resources, designed to support participants between sessions. These will include exercises, song sheets and audio and video materials, especially recorded by the ENO for participants on the programme.
No Intervention: Usual Care Group
Participants continue with usual care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in RAND-36 (RAND SF-36)
Time Frame: At baseline, then repeated after 6 weeks.
A well-established, supervised, self-completion health status questionnaire. This consists of eight sections for which a score of 0 to 100 is created, with 0 being maximum disability and 100 equivalent to no disability.
At baseline, then repeated after 6 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in COPD assessment test (CAT)
Time Frame: At baseline, then repeated after 6 weeks.
A respiratory disease health status measure that has been validated in people recovering from COVID-19. This includes 8 items, scored 0-5 with a possible score from 0 (best) to 40 (worst).
At baseline, then repeated after 6 weeks.
Changes in Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7)
Time Frame: At baseline, then repeated after 6 weeks.
Self-administered questionnaire to assess for symptoms, and severity, of anxiety. Includes seven questions scored from 0 to 3, giving a total score out of 21. Lower scores indicate less symptoms of anxiety.
At baseline, then repeated after 6 weeks.
Changes in Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: At baseline, then repeated after 6 weeks.
Self-administered questionnaire to assess for symptoms, and severity, of depression. Includes nine questions scored from 0 to 3, giving a total score out of 27. Lower scores indicate less symptoms of depression.
At baseline, then repeated after 6 weeks.
Changes in Dyspnoea-12 questionnaire
Time Frame: At baseline, then repeated after 6 weeks.
Assessment of dyspnoea. Includes 12 descriptors scored from 0 to 3, giving a total score of 36. Lower scores indicate less severe dyspnoea.
At baseline, then repeated after 6 weeks.
Changes in Visual Analogue Scale ratings of breathlessness
Time Frame: At baseline, then repeated after 6 weeks.
Four Visual Analogue Scales, scored from 0 to 100, for participants to rate their breathlessness while i) at rest, ii) walking around the house, iii) climbing stairs, iv) running. Higher scores indicate more severe dyspnoea (breathlessness).
At baseline, then repeated after 6 weeks.
Changes in SF-6D (Short-Form Six-Dimension) scores
Time Frame: At baseline, then repeated after 6 weeks.
The SF-6D uses data from the RAND SF-36 to generate a continuous index for health that can be used to create a quality-of-life score for cost utility analysis.
At baseline, then repeated after 6 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nicholas S Hopkinson, Imperial College London

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 28, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 23, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 23, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 31, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will be shared on reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will be available from the date of publication of the main study, and will remain available for at least 2 years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be shared on reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19 Recovery

Clinical Trials on ENO Breathe group

3
Subscribe