DAPAgliflozin Versus Thiazide Diuretic in Patients With Heart Failure and Diuretic RESISTance (DAPARESIST)

April 6, 2023 updated by: NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Sodium Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor DAPAgliflozin Versus Thiazide Diuretic in Patients With Heart Failure and Diuretic RESISTance: a Multi-centre, Open-label, Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial

To assess the effect of dapagliflozin compared with metolazone, added to furosemide, on diuresis and decongestion in hospitalised heart failure patients with diuretic resistance, and renal impairment. The primary analysis will be in patients with HFrEF but patients with HFpEF will also be recruited in an ancillary study and included in supplementary analyses.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The investigators aim to assess whether SGLT2i (in addition to IV loop diuretic) results in greater diuresis and decongestion compared to the standard practice of treatment with the thiazide-like diuretic metolazone (in addition to IV loop diuretic) in patients hospitalised for heart failure, with both renal impairment and diuretic resistance. Dapagliflozin has received National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) approval as an add-on option to optimised standard care in patients with HFrEF. The investigators primary focus is patients with HFrEF as it is in ambulatory patients with this phenotype that SGLT2 inhibition has already been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality (DAPA-HF).However, the investigators will also enrol patients with HFpEF in an ancillary study as they present the same management challenges as patients with HFrEF and the study hypothesis and aims are as clinically relevant in HFpEF as in HFrEF. HFpEF patients in the ancillary study will undergo the same protocol as the main study. One recent trial demonstrating benefit of a SGLT1/2 inhibitor, the Effect of Sotagliflozin on Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Post Worsening Heart Failure (SOLOIST-WHF), included patients with both HFrEF and HFpEF hospitalised with worsening heart failure (NCT03521934). This trial demonstrated similar efficacy of sotagliflozin on cardiovascular death and worsening heart failure in patients with a LVEF <50% and ≥50%.There are other large trials currently underway specifically with SGLT2i in ambulatory patients with HFpEF underway. These trials are either fully recruited, or close to full enrolment. Both already have extensive follow-up of several thousand patients and are due to complete follow up in the next 1-2 years (EMPEROR-Preserved and DELIVER). Therefore, the findings will be contemporaneous and complementary to the results of those trials.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

61

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Strathclyde
      • Glasgow, Strathclyde, United Kingdom, G4 0SF
        • Glasgow Royal Infirmary
      • Glasgow, Strathclyde, United Kingdom, G51 4TF
        • Queen Elizabeth University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Male or female ≥18 years of age

  • Informed consent
  • Primary reason for admission to hospital is worsening HF meeting the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) definition.14
  • Diuretic Resistance as defined as: Lack of weight loss or absence of a negative fluid balance (as defined above) over the preceding 24 hours despite treatment with high dose IV loop diuretic (equivalent of ≥160mg IV furosemide in 24 hours)
  • Plasma BNP ≥ 100 pg/mL or plasma NT-proBNP ≥ 400 pg/mL in current hospital admission
  • eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73m2 required within 24 hours before randomisation
  • Ongoing clinical evidence of congestion: pitting peripheral oedema and/or ascites and/or elevated jugular venous pressure, and/or radiographic or ultrasonic evidence of pulmonary congestion
  • Expected hospital length of stay >3 days

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to give informed consent e.g. due to significant cognitive impairment

    • Intravascular volume depletion based on investigator's clinical assessment
    • eGFR <20 mL/min/1.73 m2
    • Alternative explanation for worsening renal function such as obstructive nephropathy, contrast induced nephropathy, or acute tubular necrosis
    • Enrollment in another randomised clinical trial involving medical or device-based interventions (co-enrolment in observational studies is permitted)
    • Women of child-bearing potential
    • History of allergy to SGLT2i or thiazide or thiazide-like diuretics or any of the excipients
    • Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) or significant valvular disease in whom surgical or percutaneous repair or replacement may be considered.
    • SGLT2i, thiazide or thiazide-like diuretics administration in the previous 48 hours prior to randomisation
    • Active genital tract infections
    • Anyone who, in the investigators' opinion, is not suitable to participate in the trial for other reasons

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SGLT2i
Sodium-glucose Co-transporter-2 inhibitors
Dapagliflozin 10mg once daily
Other Names:
  • dapagliflozin
Experimental: Thiazide
Thiazide or thiazide like diuretic
Metolazone 5MG or 10MG once daily
Other Names:
  • metolazone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diuretic effect
Time Frame: from randomisation to 48 hours
Diuretic effect, as assessed by mean change in weight
from randomisation to 48 hours
Diuretic effect
Time Frame: from randomisation to 72 hours
Diuretic effect, as assessed by mean change in weight
from randomisation to 72 hours
Diuretic effect
Time Frame: from randomisation to 96 hours
Diuretic effect, as assessed by mean change in weight
from randomisation to 96 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in congestion measured by ultrasound
Time Frame: from randomisation to 48 hours
Change in congestion, assessed using lung ultrasound as a measure of the sum of B-lines across 8 zones
from randomisation to 48 hours
Change in congestion measured by ultrasound
Time Frame: from randomisation to 72 hours
Change in congestion, assessed using lung ultrasound as a measure of the sum of B-lines across 8 zones
from randomisation to 72 hours
Change in congestion measured by ultrasound
Time Frame: from randomisation to 96 hours
Change in congestion, assessed using lung ultrasound as a measure of the sum of B-lines across 8 zones
from randomisation to 96 hours
Loop diuretic efficiency
Time Frame: from randomisation to 48 hours
Loop diuretic efficiency will be defined as weight loss in kilograms divided by furosemide equivalents in milligrams.
from randomisation to 48 hours
Loop diuretic efficiency
Time Frame: from randomisation to 72 hours
Loop diuretic efficiency will be defined as weight loss in kilograms divided by furosemide equivalents in milligrams.
from randomisation to 72 hours
Loop diuretic efficiency
Time Frame: from randomisation to 96 hours
Loop diuretic efficiency will be defined as weight loss in kilograms divided by furosemide equivalents in milligrams.
from randomisation to 96 hours
Change in ADVOR clinical congestion score
Time Frame: from randomisation to 48 hours
Change in ADVOR clinical congestion score will be measured on a scale of 0 to 10 with 0 being the least congested
from randomisation to 48 hours
Change in ADVOR clinical congestion score
Time Frame: from randomisation to 72 hours
Change in ADVOR clinical congestion score will be measured on a scale of 0 to 10 with 0 being the least congested
from randomisation to 72 hours
Change in ADVOR clinical congestion score
Time Frame: from randomisation to 96 hours
Change in ADVOR clinical congestion score will be measured on a scale of 0 to 10 with 0 being the least congested
from randomisation to 96 hours

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in urinary spot sodium
Time Frame: from randomisation to 48 hours
change in urinary spot urine measured in mmol/L
from randomisation to 48 hours
Change in urinary spot sodium
Time Frame: from randomisation to 72 hours
change in urinary spot urine measured in mmol/L
from randomisation to 72 hours
Change in urinary spot sodium
Time Frame: from randomisation to 96 hours
change in urinary spot urine measured in mmol/L
from randomisation to 96 hours
Change in NT-proBNP
Time Frame: from randomisation to 48 hours
measured in pg/ml
from randomisation to 48 hours
Change in NT-proBNP
Time Frame: from randomisation to 72 hours
measured in pg/ml
from randomisation to 72 hours
Change in NT-proBNP
Time Frame: from randomisation to 96 hours
measured in pg/ml
from randomisation to 96 hours
Change in serum uric acid
Time Frame: from randomisation to 48 hours
measured in umol/L
from randomisation to 48 hours
Change in serum uric acid
Time Frame: from randomisation to 72 hours
measured in umol/L
from randomisation to 72 hours
Change in serum uric acid
Time Frame: from randomisation to 96 hours
measured in umol/L
from randomisation to 96 hours
Total net fluid loss
Time Frame: from randomisation to 48 hours
difference between fluid intake and output measured in ml
from randomisation to 48 hours
Total net fluid loss
Time Frame: from randomisation to 72 hours
difference between fluid intake and output measured in ml
from randomisation to 72 hours
Total net fluid loss
Time Frame: from randomisation to 96 hours
difference between fluid intake and output measured in ml
from randomisation to 96 hours
Change in dyspnoea
Time Frame: from randomisation to 48 hours
Change in dyspnoea (breathlessness) measured using a 7 point Likert scale (1= strong positive to 7 = strong negative) and a 11-point Dyspnoea Numerical Rating scale (0= not breathless at all to 10=breathlessness as bad as you can imagine)
from randomisation to 48 hours
Change in dyspnoea
Time Frame: from randomisation to 72 hours
Change in dyspnoea (breathlessness) measured using a 7 point Likert scale (1= strong positive to 7 = strong negative) and a 11-point Dyspnoea Numerical Rating scale (0= not breathless at all to 10=breathlessness as bad as you can imagine)
from randomisation to 72 hours
Change in dyspnoea
Time Frame: from randomisation to 96 hours
Change in dyspnoea (breathlessness) measured using a 7 point Likert scale (1= strong positive to 7 = strong negative) and a 11-point Dyspnoea Numerical Rating scale (0= not breathless at all to 10=breathlessness as bad as you can imagine)
from randomisation to 96 hours
Patient global assessment
Time Frame: from randomisation to 48 hours
Change in patients perception of their own health measured using a 7 point Likert scale (1= strong positive to 7 = strong negative)
from randomisation to 48 hours
Patient global assessment
Time Frame: from randomisation to 72 hours
Change in patients perception of their own health measured using a 7 point Likert scale (1= strong positive to 7 = strong negative)
from randomisation to 72 hours
Patient global assessment
Time Frame: from randomisation to 96 hours
Change in patients perception of their own health measured using a 7 point Likert scale (1= strong positive to 7 = strong negative)
from randomisation to 96 hours
Time from randomisation to discharge
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 days
Time from randomisation to discharge measured in hours
through study completion, an average of 5 days
In-hospital mortality
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 days
Number of patients who died in hospital
through study completion, an average of 5 days
Serum uric acid ≥360 μmol/L
Time Frame: from randomisation to 48 hours
measured in umol/L
from randomisation to 48 hours
Serum uric acid ≥360 μmol/L
Time Frame: from randomisation to 72 hours
measured in umol/L
from randomisation to 72 hours
Serum uric acid ≥360 μmol/L
Time Frame: from randomisation to 96 hours
measured in umol/L
from randomisation to 96 hours
change in serum glucose
Time Frame: from randomisation to 72 hours
measured in mmol/L
from randomisation to 72 hours
change in serum glucose
Time Frame: from randomisation to 48 hours
measured in mmol/L
from randomisation to 48 hours
change in serum glucose
Time Frame: from randomisation to 96 hours
measured in mmol/L
from randomisation to 96 hours
Rate of heart failure re-hospitalisation or death
Time Frame: through study completion (on average 5 days) and up to 90 days
Number of patients who are re-admitted to hospital after initial discharge
through study completion (on average 5 days) and up to 90 days
Change in serum creatinine
Time Frame: from randomisation to 48 hours
measured in umol/L
from randomisation to 48 hours
Change in serum creatinine
Time Frame: from randomisation to 72 hours
measured in umol/L
from randomisation to 72 hours
Change in serum creatinine
Time Frame: from randomisation to 96 hours
measured in umol/L
from randomisation to 96 hours
increase in serum creatinine concentration
Time Frame: from randomisation to 48 hours
measured in umol/L
from randomisation to 48 hours
increase in serum creatinine concentration
Time Frame: from randomisation to 72 hours
measured in umol/L
from randomisation to 72 hours
increase in serum creatinine concentration
Time Frame: from randomisation to 96 hours
measured in umol/L
from randomisation to 96 hours
change in blood urea (nitrogen)
Time Frame: from randomisation to 48 hours
measured in mmol/L
from randomisation to 48 hours
change in blood urea (nitrogen)
Time Frame: from randomisation to 72 hours
measured in mmol/L
from randomisation to 72 hours
change in blood urea (nitrogen)
Time Frame: from randomisation to 96 hours
measured in mmol/L
from randomisation to 96 hours
change in serum potassium
Time Frame: from randomisation to 48 hours
measured in mmol/L
from randomisation to 48 hours
change in serum potassium
Time Frame: from randomisation to 72 hours
measured in mmol/L
from randomisation to 72 hours
change in serum potassium
Time Frame: from randomisation to 96 hours
measured in mmol/L
from randomisation to 96 hours
Serum potassium <3.5 mmol/L and ≥5.5 mmol/L
Time Frame: from randomisation to 48 hours
measured in mmol/L
from randomisation to 48 hours
Serum potassium <3.5 mmol/L and ≥5.5 mmol/L
Time Frame: from randomisation to 72 hours
measured in mmol/L
from randomisation to 72 hours
Serum potassium <3.5 mmol/L and ≥5.5 mmol/L
Time Frame: from randomisation to 96 hours
measured in mmol/L
from randomisation to 96 hours
change in serum sodium
Time Frame: from randomisation to 48 hours
measured in mmol/L
from randomisation to 48 hours
change in serum sodium
Time Frame: from randomisation to 72 hours
measured in mmol/L
from randomisation to 72 hours
change in serum sodium
Time Frame: from randomisation to 96 hours
measured in mmol/L
from randomisation to 96 hours
Serum sodium concentration <125 mmol/L
Time Frame: from randomisation to 48 hours
measured in mmol/L
from randomisation to 48 hours
Serum sodium concentration <125 mmol/L
Time Frame: from randomisation to 72 hours
measured in mmol/L
from randomisation to 72 hours
Serum sodium concentration <125 mmol/L
Time Frame: from randomisation to 96 hours
measured in mmol/L
from randomisation to 96 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: John McMurray, MBChB, University of Glasgow and NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 27, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 3, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

To be discussed and agreed at TSC

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Dapagliflozin 10 MG Oral Tablet

3
Subscribe