Impact of Novel Thoracic Wall Blocks With Dexmetomidine on Inflammatory Markers Following Breast Cancer Surgery

September 27, 2021 updated by: St. Elizabeth Cancer Institute, Slovakia
The study will test the hypothesis that inflammatory markers measured at 24 hours after breast cancer surgery will be lower in patients receiving PECS II and PIFB blocks, supplemented with dexmetomidine compared to standard care group.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Breast cancer is a devastating disease. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment which can lead to ongoing patient difficulties. Severe acute pain after surgery is one of major risk factors for developing persistent postsurgical pain. Subsequent physiological stress caused by this severe pain may negatively influence the immune response leading to a worse prognosis.

Regional anesthesia is very effective in management of peri- and postoperative pain. Epidural block, paravertebral block and intercostal nerve blocks have been proven over time to be effective in preventing postoperative pain. However, their widespread use has been hampered by technical difficulty and inherent risks.

Unlike the aforementioned blocks, novel thoracic wall blocks, namely modified pectoralis block (PECS II) and pecto-intercostal fascial block (PIFB) are safe, simple and effective.

Efforts to prolong and improve analgesia following single shot blocks has led to the introduction of adjuvants into the local anesthetic. Dexmetomidine is a superselective Alpha 2 agonist with a proven ability to prolong the duration of neuraxial, peripheral nerve and interfascial plane blocks.

Chronic inflammation is recognized as a risk factor for initiation, progression and further spread of malignant growth. Surgical insult leads to inflammatory response which facilitates the development of a metastatic disease. Many inflammatory markers were proven to be independent prognostic factors in breast cancer patients.

The investigators propose to study the impact of novel thoracic wall blocks with dexmetomidine on simple inflammatory markers obtained from full blood count (NLR, PLR, NPR, PDW, MPV, RDW) after breast cancer surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Tomas Hitka, MD
  • Phone Number: 00421902753979
  • Email: hitka@yahoo.com

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female patients with ductal carcinoma (stage 1 to 3) undergoing primary potentially curative unilateral mastectomy.
  • Older than 18 years
  • ASA I-III

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Weight < 50 kg
  • BMI > 35
  • Allergy to local anaesthetic or dexmetomidine
  • Contraindications to NSAIDs use
  • Local infection over block site
  • Coagulopathy
  • Preexisting chronic pain
  • Pregnancy
  • Autoimmune disease
  • Inability to give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Block group
Patients in a Block group will be anesthetized and receive PECS II+PIFB with dexmetomidine prior to their surgery.

PECS II: Ultrasound guided block involving injection of 20 ml of 0.25% L-bupivacaine with dexmetomidine into an interfascial plane between the serratus anterior muscle and the external intercostal muscles followed by the needle withdrawal into an interfascial plane between the pectoralis major and pectoralis minor muscle where further 10ml will be administered.

PIFB: Ultrasound guided block involving injection of 10 ml of 0.25% L-bupivacaine with dexmetomidine into an iterfascial plane between the pectoralis major and the intercostal muscles approximately 2 cm laterally from the sternum to cover T2 to T6 dermatomes.

No Intervention: Control group
Patients in a Control group will receive a standard general anesthesia the same way as patients in the interventional group but without regional anesthesia.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in NLR
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
Difference in neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) between the intervention group and the standard care group measured at 24 hours after breast cancer surgery
24 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Markers of inflammation
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
Difference in Δ NLR, PLR, NPR, PDW, MPV and RDW between the intervention group and the standard care group measured at 24 hours after breast cancer surgery
24 hours after surgery
Intraoperative opioids
Time Frame: Duration of surgery
Intraoperative consumption of opioids
Duration of surgery
Pain after surgery
Time Frame: 1,6,12,18,24 hours after surgery
Numeric rating scale for pain (NRS, 0-10, where 0 means no pain and 10 the worst pain) at 0, 1h, 6h, 12h,18h,24h after surgery at rest and at ipsilateral arm abduction
1,6,12,18,24 hours after surgery
Opioid consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours
Total opioid consumption after surgery at 24 h
24 hours

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse effects
Time Frame: 24 hours
Incidence of potential adverse effects
24 hours
Postsurgical pain
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery
Incidence of postsurgical pain at 1month, 2month and 3 months
3 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tomas Hitka, MD, St. Elizabeth Cancer Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

November 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 07-2021/EK OUSA

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inflammatory Markers

Clinical Trials on Modified pectoralis block (PEC II) and pecto-intercostal fascial plane block (PIFB)

3
Subscribe