- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04860115
Impact of Novel Thoracic Wall Blocks With Dexmetomidine on Inflammatory Markers Following Breast Cancer Surgery
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Breast cancer is a devastating disease. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment which can lead to ongoing patient difficulties. Severe acute pain after surgery is one of major risk factors for developing persistent postsurgical pain. Subsequent physiological stress caused by this severe pain may negatively influence the immune response leading to a worse prognosis.
Regional anesthesia is very effective in management of peri- and postoperative pain. Epidural block, paravertebral block and intercostal nerve blocks have been proven over time to be effective in preventing postoperative pain. However, their widespread use has been hampered by technical difficulty and inherent risks.
Unlike the aforementioned blocks, novel thoracic wall blocks, namely modified pectoralis block (PECS II) and pecto-intercostal fascial block (PIFB) are safe, simple and effective.
Efforts to prolong and improve analgesia following single shot blocks has led to the introduction of adjuvants into the local anesthetic. Dexmetomidine is a superselective Alpha 2 agonist with a proven ability to prolong the duration of neuraxial, peripheral nerve and interfascial plane blocks.
Chronic inflammation is recognized as a risk factor for initiation, progression and further spread of malignant growth. Surgical insult leads to inflammatory response which facilitates the development of a metastatic disease. Many inflammatory markers were proven to be independent prognostic factors in breast cancer patients.
The investigators propose to study the impact of novel thoracic wall blocks with dexmetomidine on simple inflammatory markers obtained from full blood count (NLR, PLR, NPR, PDW, MPV, RDW) after breast cancer surgery.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Tomas Hitka, MD
- Phone Number: 00421902753979
- Email: hitka@yahoo.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Roman Zahorec, MD
- Phone Number: 00421 2 32249210
- Email: roman.zahorec@ousa.sk
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female patients with ductal carcinoma (stage 1 to 3) undergoing primary potentially curative unilateral mastectomy.
- Older than 18 years
- ASA I-III
Exclusion Criteria:
- Weight < 50 kg
- BMI > 35
- Allergy to local anaesthetic or dexmetomidine
- Contraindications to NSAIDs use
- Local infection over block site
- Coagulopathy
- Preexisting chronic pain
- Pregnancy
- Autoimmune disease
- Inability to give informed consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Block group
Patients in a Block group will be anesthetized and receive PECS II+PIFB with dexmetomidine prior to their surgery.
|
PECS II: Ultrasound guided block involving injection of 20 ml of 0.25% L-bupivacaine with dexmetomidine into an interfascial plane between the serratus anterior muscle and the external intercostal muscles followed by the needle withdrawal into an interfascial plane between the pectoralis major and pectoralis minor muscle where further 10ml will be administered. PIFB: Ultrasound guided block involving injection of 10 ml of 0.25% L-bupivacaine with dexmetomidine into an iterfascial plane between the pectoralis major and the intercostal muscles approximately 2 cm laterally from the sternum to cover T2 to T6 dermatomes. |
No Intervention: Control group
Patients in a Control group will receive a standard general anesthesia the same way as patients in the interventional group but without regional anesthesia.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Difference in NLR
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
|
Difference in neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) between the intervention group and the standard care group measured at 24 hours after breast cancer surgery
|
24 hours after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Markers of inflammation
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
|
Difference in Δ NLR, PLR, NPR, PDW, MPV and RDW between the intervention group and the standard care group measured at 24 hours after breast cancer surgery
|
24 hours after surgery
|
Intraoperative opioids
Time Frame: Duration of surgery
|
Intraoperative consumption of opioids
|
Duration of surgery
|
Pain after surgery
Time Frame: 1,6,12,18,24 hours after surgery
|
Numeric rating scale for pain (NRS, 0-10, where 0 means no pain and 10 the worst pain) at 0, 1h, 6h, 12h,18h,24h after surgery at rest and at ipsilateral arm abduction
|
1,6,12,18,24 hours after surgery
|
Opioid consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Total opioid consumption after surgery at 24 h
|
24 hours
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Adverse effects
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Incidence of potential adverse effects
|
24 hours
|
Postsurgical pain
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery
|
Incidence of postsurgical pain at 1month, 2month and 3 months
|
3 months after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Tomas Hitka, MD, St. Elizabeth Cancer Institute
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- de la Torre PA, Garcia PD, Alvarez SL, Miguel FJ, Perez MF. A novel ultrasound-guided block: a promising alternative for breast analgesia. Aesthet Surg J. 2014 Jan 1;34(1):198-200. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13515902. No abstract available.
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
- Blanco R, Fajardo M, Parras Maldonado T. Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modified Pecs I): a novel approach to breast surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Nov;59(9):470-5. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
- Andersen KG, Kehlet H. Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment: a critical review of risk factors and strategies for prevention. J Pain. 2011 Jul;12(7):725-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.12.005. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
- Fecho K, Miller NR, Merritt SA, Klauber-Demore N, Hultman CS, Blau WS. Acute and persistent postoperative pain after breast surgery. Pain Med. 2009 May-Jun;10(4):708-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00611.x. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
- Kulhari S, Bharti N, Bala I, Arora S, Singh G. Efficacy of pectoral nerve block versus thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after radical mastectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Sep;117(3):382-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew223.
- Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011 Mar 4;144(5):646-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013.
- Klein SM, Bergh A, Steele SM, Georgiade GS, Greengrass RA. Thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000 Jun;90(6):1402-5. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200006000-00026.
- Fritsch G, Danninger T, Allerberger K, Tsodikov A, Felder TK, Kapeller M, Gerner P, Brummett CM. Dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine extends the duration of interscalene brachial plexus blocks for elective shoulder surgery when compared with ropivacaine alone: a single-center, prospective, triple-blind, randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Jan-Feb;39(1):37-47. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000033.
- Lee SK, Choi MY, Bae SY, Lee JH, Lee HC, Kil WH, Lee JE, Kim SW, Nam SJ. Immediate postoperative inflammation is an important prognostic factor in breast cancer. Oncology. 2015;88(6):337-44. doi: 10.1159/000368985. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
- Duff S, Connolly C, Buggy DJ. Adrenergic, Inflammatory, and Immune Function in the Setting of Oncological Surgery: Their Effects on Cancer Progression and the Role of the Anesthetic Technique in their Modulation. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2016 Fall;54(4):48-57. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0000000000000120. No abstract available.
- Freise H, Van Aken HK. Risks and benefits of thoracic epidural anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Dec;107(6):859-68. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer339. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
- Kolawole IK, Adesina MD, Olaoye IO. Intercostal nerves block for mastectomy in two patients with advanced breast malignancy. J Natl Med Assoc. 2006 Mar;98(3):450-3.
- Marhofer P, Brummett CM. Safety and efficiency of dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to local anesthetics. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016 Oct;29(5):632-7. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000364.
- Xu L, Hu Z, Shen J, McQuillan PM. Efficacy of US-guided transversus abdominis plane block and rectus sheath block with ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine in elderly high-risk patients. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 Jan;84(1):18-24. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.11538-5. Epub 2017 May 19.
- Koh CH, Bhoo-Pathy N, Ng KL, Jabir RS, Tan GH, See MH, Jamaris S, Taib NA. Utility of pre-treatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio as prognostic factors in breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2015 Jun 30;113(1):150-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.183. Epub 2015 May 28.
- Krenn-Pilko S, Langsenlehner U, Thurner EM, Stojakovic T, Pichler M, Gerger A, Kapp KS, Langsenlehner T. The elevated preoperative platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor prognosis in breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2014 May 13;110(10):2524-30. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.163. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
- Hu L, Li M, Ding Y, Pu L, Liu J, Xie J, Cabanero M, Li J, Xiang R, Xiong S. Prognostic value of RDW in cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017 Feb 28;8(9):16027-16035. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13784.
- Ni Eochagain A, Burns D, Riedel B, Sessler DI, Buggy DJ. The effect of anaesthetic technique during primary breast cancer surgery on neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio and return to intended oncological therapy. Anaesthesia. 2018 May;73(5):603-611. doi: 10.1111/anae.14207. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 07-2021/EK OUSA
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Inflammatory Markers
-
University of AarhusUnknownInflammatory Markers | Glucose Infusion | Bone MarkersDenmark
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationWithdrawnInflammatory Markers | PulpotomyIsrael
-
IVI MadridCompletedInflammatory Markers | Androgen Profile | IVF OutcomeSpain
-
Hamad Medical CorporationRecruitingInflammatory Markers Changes in Response to Extra-corporeal Membrane Oxygenator DecannulationQatar
-
Colgate PalmoliveCompletedPeriodontal Disease | Systemic Inflammatory Markers
-
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"CompletedBirth Weight | Systemic Inflammation Markers | Combined Systemic Inflammatory IndicesItaly
-
Bispebjerg HospitalCompleted
-
Rockefeller UniversityCompletedObesity | Ketosis | Time Restricted Feeding | Inflammatory Markers | Glycemic VariationUnited States
-
Hospital AvicenneRoche Diagnostics; ProBayes; Biorance Laboratoires RéunisCompletedBiological Markers | Inappropriate PrescribingFrance
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedInsulin Resistance | Inflammatory MarkersEgypt
Clinical Trials on Modified pectoralis block (PEC II) and pecto-intercostal fascial plane block (PIFB)
-
Taichung Veterans General HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
University of British ColumbiaCompletedPain, Postoperative | Anesthesia, RegionalCanada
-
Beni-Suef UniversityRecruitingPain | PostoperativeEgypt
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompleted
-
Tanta UniversityRecruitingCardiac Surgery | Postoperative Analgesia | Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Block | Transversus Thoracis Muscle Plane BlockEgypt
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesCompletedAnalgesia | SternotomyUnited States
-
ghada fouadEnrolling by invitationPostoperative Anelgesic Effect of Rhomboid Intercostal Nerve Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane BlockPost Operative PainEgypt
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiRecruiting
-
Hitit UniversityRecruitingPostoperative;Pain ManagementTurkey
-
Ohio State UniversityRecruiting