Performance and Safety of Routine Cataract Surgery With Visiol

November 21, 2023 updated by: TRB Chemedica
In this clinical investigation, the performance and safety of routine cataract surgery with VISIOL will be assessed

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10400
        • Rajavithi Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Over 18 years cataract patients whom investigator routine considered to treat by surgery with Visiol before recruit to study

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female aged 18 years and older;
  • Candidate for cataract surgery via phacoemulsification;
  • Ophthalmic surgeon's recommendation to use VISIOL prior to recruitment;
  • Eligible for the use of VISIOL as indicated in the instructions for use;
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any of VISIOL components;
  • Known pregnancy or breast feeding;
  • Participation in any other clinical research study within the last 90 days;
  • Patients with legally restricted autonomy, freedom of decision and action (e.g. those with measure of custody or judicial protection);
  • Incapacity to understand the informed consent and/or to comply with the Clinical Investigation Plan (CIP), per investigator's appreciation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Corneal endothelial cells density in percent
Time Frame: Change from pre-surgery Corneal endothelial cells density at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
The variation of corneal endothelial cells density (cells/mm2) as compared to baseline (pre-surgery) will be calculated (%)
Change from pre-surgery Corneal endothelial cells density at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Corneal endothelial cells area
Time Frame: Change from pre-surgery Corneal endothelial cells area at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
The area (µm2) of corneal endothelial cells will be measured using a non-contact specular microscopy.
Change from pre-surgery Corneal endothelial cells area at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
Corneal endothelial cells density
Time Frame: Change from pre-surgery Corneal endothelial cells density at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
The density (cells/mm2) of corneal endothelial cells will be measured using a non-contact specular microscopy.
Change from pre-surgery Corneal endothelial cells density at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
Corneal endothelial cells regularity
Time Frame: Change from pre-surgery Corneal endothelial cells regularity at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90

The regularity (variation of size) of corneal endothelial cells will be measured using a non-contact specular microscopy. In particular, the endothelial regularity will be assessed using the following classification described in ISO 11980:2012:37 0 = Regular endothelial mosaic;

  1. = Isolated difference in cell size;
  2. = Just noticeable variation in cell size or bumpiness of cell layer;
  3. = Easily detected difference in cell size or bumpiness of cell layer;
  4. = Noticeable cell layer bumpiness and loss of definition of cell borders.
Change from pre-surgery Corneal endothelial cells regularity at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
The presence of keratic precipitates
Time Frame: Change from pre-surgery presence of keratic precipitate at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
The presence (0 = No, 1 = Yes) of Keratic precipitate will be recorded
Change from pre-surgery presence of keratic precipitate at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
A description of keratic precipitates type
Time Frame: Change from pre-surgery a description of keratic precipitates type at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
A description of keratic precipitates type will be recorded
Change from pre-surgery a description of keratic precipitates type at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
Central corneal thickness
Time Frame: Change from pre-surgery central corneal thickness at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
Central corneal thickness (micrometer) will be measured using non-contact specular microscopy
Change from pre-surgery central corneal thickness at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
Corneal oedema
Time Frame: Change from pre-surgery corneal oedema at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90

Corneal oedema grading will be assessed using a specular microscopy. Gradings will be referred to location of oedema

  1. = Peripheral oedema
  2. = Central oedema
  3. = Generalised oedema
Change from pre-surgery corneal oedema at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
Intra-ocular pressure
Time Frame: Change from pre-surgery intra-ocular pressure at Day 0 (surgery day), Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
Intra-ocular pressure (mmHg) will be evaluated using a Goldmann applanation tonometry
Change from pre-surgery intra-ocular pressure at Day 0 (surgery day), Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
Incidence of intra-ocular pressure peak
Time Frame: Change from pre-surgery intra-ocular pressure peaks at Day 0 (surgery day), Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
The incidence of intra-ocular pressure peaks (≥ 30 mmHg) will be recorded
Change from pre-surgery intra-ocular pressure peaks at Day 0 (surgery day), Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
Anterior chamber inflammation cell
Time Frame: Change from pre-surgery anterior chamber inflammation cell at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
Anterior chamber inflammation will be assessed using slit lamp biomicroscopy (1 mm slit beam). It will be classified based on SUN grading Grade 0 = < 1 cell in field Grade 0.5 = 1-5 cells in field Grade 1 = 6-15 cells in field Grade 2 = 16-25 cells in field Grade 3 = 26-50 cells in field Grade 4 = over 50 cells in field
Change from pre-surgery anterior chamber inflammation cell at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
Anterior chamber inflammation flare
Time Frame: Change from pre-surgery anterior chamber inflammation flare at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
Anterior chamber inflammation will be assessed using slit lamp biomicroscopy (1 mm slit beam). It will be classified based on SUN grading Grade 0 = no flare Grade 1 = faint Grade 2 = moderate (iris/ lens details clear) Grade 3 = marked (iris/ lens details hazy) Grade 4 = Intense (fibrin/ plastic aqueous)
Change from pre-surgery anterior chamber inflammation flare at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA)
Time Frame: Change from pre-surgery BCVA at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
BCVA will be evaluated using standard ETDRS logMAR chart
Change from pre-surgery BCVA at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
Intra-surgery information for duration of intervention
Time Frame: During Surgery (Day 0)
duration of intervention (min)
During Surgery (Day 0)
Intra-surgery information for use of finger grip
Time Frame: During Surgery (Day 0)
Use of finger grip (yes or no)
During Surgery (Day 0)
Intra-surgery information for time needed to remove VISIOL
Time Frame: During Surgery (Day 0)
Time needed to remove VISIOL (min) counted from the time when intra-ocular lens was inserted until when the aspiration tip is removed
During Surgery (Day 0)
Intra-surgery information for volume of VISIOL used
Time Frame: During Surgery (Day 0)
Total volume of VISIOL used (mL)
During Surgery (Day 0)
Intra-surgery information for material of intra-ocular lens used
Time Frame: During Surgery (Day 0)
Material of intra-ocular lens used (acrylic or silicone)
During Surgery (Day 0)
Intra-surgery information for power of intra-ocular lens used
Time Frame: During Surgery (Day 0)
Power (diopters) of intra-ocular lens used
During Surgery (Day 0)
Intra-surgery information for incision size
Time Frame: During Surgery (Day 0)
Incision size (mm)
During Surgery (Day 0)
Intra-surgery information for energetic parameter power or energy
Time Frame: During Surgery (Day 0)
Power or energy (% or mJ) during phacoemulsification and photolysis
During Surgery (Day 0)
Intra-surgery information for time of phacoemulsification
Time Frame: During Surgery (Day 0)
Time (min) during phacoemulsification
During Surgery (Day 0)
Intra-surgery information for vacuum
Time Frame: During Surgery (Day 0)
Vacuum (mmHg) during phacoemulsification
During Surgery (Day 0)
Investigator's subjective judgement
Time Frame: During Surgery (Day 0)

using a 4 point grading scale: ease of VISIOL injection, maintenance of the anterior chamber depth during the capsulorhexis and IOL implantation, ability to remain in the anterior chamber during phacoemulsification and photolysis, clarity of the substance, ease of capsulorhexis, ease of IOL implementation, ease of VISIOL removal and global impression on the product performance during the surgery. Grading scale will be assessed 0 = Not effective

  1. = slightly effective
  2. = moderately effective
  3. = very effective
During Surgery (Day 0)
Global evaluation of the performance by the investigator
Time Frame: Surgery day (Day 0) and Day 90

Global evaluation of the performance of cataract surgery with VISIOL by the investigator 0 = no improvement

  1. = slight improvement
  2. = moderate improvement
  3. = great improvement
Surgery day (Day 0) and Day 90
Global evaluation of the performance by the patient
Time Frame: Surgery day (Day 0) and Day 90

Global evaluation of the performance of cataract surgery with VISIOL by the patient 0 = no improvement

  1. = slight improvement
  2. = moderate improvement
  3. = great improvement
Surgery day (Day 0) and Day 90
Adverse events (AE)
Time Frame: Pre-surgery, Surgery day (Day 0), Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90
including their incidence, intensity, seriousness, expectedness and causal relationship with the use of investigational device or study procedure
Pre-surgery, Surgery day (Day 0), Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 90

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 27, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 9, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

October 27, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Following Cataract Surgery

3
Subscribe