The Dynamic Change of MMN in Patients With Sepsis Associated Encephalopathy

April 28, 2021 updated by: Chinese Medical Association

The Dynamic Change of Mismatch Negativity is More Associated With Sepsis Associated Encephalopathy and Prognosis at Discharge

Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE), is one of the most common organ dysfunction during the acute phase in sepsis and septic shock. Electroencephalogram (EEG) and auditory evoked potentials (AEPs), which reflect different aspects of brain function, are the most commonly used neurophysiological indices to detect acute brain dysfunction in critically ill patients including sepsis and septic shock. AEPs show the systemic responsiveness of the central nervous to auditory stimuli, so they can be considered a direct measure of brain responsiveness. Mismatch negativity (MMN) is a change-specific component of ERPs, which elicited by a deviant stimulus occurring in a sequence of repetitive stimuli. This component is thought to represent the automatic and unconscious detection of acoustic changes which requires good perceptual discriminative capacity and iconic memory. The peaks of MMN appear at 100 ~ 250 ms from deviant stimulus onset; with increasing magnitude of stimulus change, the peak latency of MMN was shortened and the amplitude increased. Since MMN can be elicited even in the absence of attention, subjects do not need to actively participate. The MMN has been extensively demonstrated to be used in the prediction of awakening in comatose patients for various reasons, and also has been reported to predict awakening in deeply sedated critically ill patients recently. However, it remains unclear whether SAE affects MMN in amplitude and latency that reflects cognitive processing of the auditory information.

Patients with sepsis and septic shock who met the inclusion criteria were screened daily on the CAM-ICU scale, and those with positive CAM-ICU were diagnosed with SAE.All patients were tested for event-evoked potentials on Day 1 and Day 3 after inclusion and were followed up to Day 28 after discharge. The investigators intend to observe the dynamic change of MMN amplitude and latency between SAE and non-SAE groups. Logic regression analysis was used to determine whether the change of MMN was a predictor of SAE.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patient characteristics (including age and sex), date and time of ICU admission, category of admission (medical, surgical or emergency), main reasons for admission, co-morbidities, complications and duration of sepsis before admission were collected. The severity of illness assessed by the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation scoring system (APACHE) II and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, bladder temperature, heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), respiratory rate (RR), the level of consciousness assessed by the GCS score, mechanical ventilation (MV) or not, the depth of sedation assessed by RASS, and dose of sedative drugs at 1 and 3 days after admission were also collected.The EEG signal was recorded on the 1st and 3rd day after admission using silver-silver chloride disc electrodes placed on the scalp according to the international 10-20 system. Four electrode locations (left frontal [F3], right frontal [F4], frontal midpoint [Fz] and central [Cz]) were used. All electrodes were referred to the both earlobe and the ground electrode on the forehead. The electrode-skin impedances were kept below 5 kΩ. The EEG signal was amplified and digitized continuously at 279 Hz using EMMA (ERP measuring machine; developed and custom-made in the Department of reinject Medical Equipment Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, China) Background EEG was recorded for 10 min during sleep and/or while the patients lay motionless with their eyes closed in a quiet room. Auditory stimulation was then set to 'on' so that ERPs could be recorded. The stimulation was applied according to an oddball paradigm, which consisted of 85% standard (800 Hz) and 15% deviant (560 Hz) stimuli, with an interstimulus interval of 1 s. The duration of each stimulus was 84 ms, including 7 ms rise and fall times. Altogether 600 stimuli were delivered through earphones to the right ear for each measurement, corresponding to a recording time of about 10 min. The stimulus intensity was set at 75 dB. According to the patient's original EEG, the investigators recorded the main components of the background wave, whether there was periodic discharge and low voltage.The amplitude and latency of MMN components of the event evoked potential.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

84

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Beiyuan Zhang, M.S.
  • Phone Number: +86-025-83106666-40400
  • Email: 1083537599@qq.com

Study Locations

    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210008
        • Recruiting
        • Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients with confirmed sepsis or septic shock

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ages between 18 and 80 years;
  • expected stay in the ICU of > 72 h;
  • patients diagnosed with sepsis or septic shock;
  • informed consent was signed by the patient or relatives;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • at terminal stage of disease;
  • primary brain injury (such as traumatic brain injury, stroke, cardiac arrest, intracranial infection, epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson disease and meningitis etc.);
  • acute mental deterioration secondary to non-septic metabolic disorders with organ dysfunction (hepatic encephalopathy, pulmonary encephalopathy, severe electrolyte imbalance, severe blood glucose disorders etc.);
  • history of craniocerebral surgery;
  • psychiatric illness;
  • use of psychiatric medications;
  • impaired hearing; participated in other clinical trial;
  • pregnant or lactating women;
  • expected death within 72 h after admission.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
SAE group
SAE was defined as cerebral dysfunction in the presence of sepsis or septic shock and the absence of any of the exclusion criteria. For patients undergoing sedation during the ICU stay, the GCS scores were evaluated before sedation; for patients who have been sedated prior to ICU admission, the assumed GCS scores, i.e., the scores measured before any administration of sedative/relaxant drug were used for analysing; for postoperative patients, the GCS scores measured before surgery was used. The CAM-ICU was assessed daily by the nurse or the physician in charge of the patient during the ICU stay. For patients who were sedated, spontaneous awakening trials were performed daily; the longest evaluate time after withdrawal of sedation was 24 h during the trials. In this evaluation period, patients should be awake to evaluate their consciousness, and they were diagnosed of SAE if the patients were not awake.
non-SAE group
The patient was diagnosed with sepsis or septic shock but could not be diagnosed with SAE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the dynamic change of mismatch negativity(MMN) amplitude
Time Frame: Day 1 and day 3 after admission
μv
Day 1 and day 3 after admission
the dynamic change of MMN incubation period
Time Frame: Day 1 and day 3 after admission
ms
Day 1 and day 3 after admission

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Burst suppression
Time Frame: Day 1 and day 3 after admission
Yes or no
Day 1 and day 3 after admission
Periodic discharges
Time Frame: Day 1 and day 3 after admission
Yes or no
Day 1 and day 3 after admission
Normal background
Time Frame: Day 1 and day 3 after admission
Yes or no
Day 1 and day 3 after admission

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Wenkui Yu, M.D., The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

It is not yet known if there will be a plan to make IPD available

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy

3
Subscribe