Myofunctional Training for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients After Transoral Robotic Surgery

Efficacy of Oropharyngeal Myofunctional Therapeutic Training for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients After Transoral Robotic Surgery

Background: Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSA) is a kind of sleep disorder. The symptoms are intermittent, partial or complete upper airway collapse, seriously impacting oxygen saturation and oxidative stress. Some patients choose to do upper airway surgeries, but the success rate is only 60-70%. The symptoms might relapse because of aging and gaining weights. The purpose of our study is to compare the effect of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and oropharyngeal rehabilitation (OPR) on patients after TORS. Methods: Participants above 20 years old who are newly diagnosed with mild to severe OSA (Apnea-hypopnea Index >5/h), and the physician will explain the treatment programs to every subject in clinic. Expected results: The hypothesis of this study is the success rate of surgery will be enhance by increasing tongue and jaw-opening muscle strength after OPR. The biomarkers of cardiovascular disease may decrease and both the collapse of upper airway and sleep quality may be improved after TORS and OPR.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The participants above 20 years old who are newly diagnosed with mild to severe OSA (Apnea-hypopnea Index >5/h), and the physician will explain the treatment programs to every subject. By their willingness to choose the therapeutic method, the participants who select the surgery interventions will be assign to TORS or TORS+OPR group. The matched controls as well as age-, sex-, and body mass index-matched OSA participants will be selected from the patients who are waiting for oral appliance, losing weight and using continuous positive airway pressure. Before surgery, 6 week and 18 week after surgery, the investiagters will compare the polysomnography data, questionnaires of sleep quality, drug-induced sleep endoscopy and computed tomography as primary outcomes. The investigators will also compare the tongue and jaw-opening muscle strength and biomarkers of oxidative stress, anti-oxidative stress, inflammatory cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases 9 as secondary outcomes. The OPR would begin at 6 week after surgery, and participants will undergo three months of the home-based oropharyngeal myofunctional therapeutic training. During the training intervention period, participants will be interviewed one time per week for adjusting the treatment intensity.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

105

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Please Select
      • Tainan, Please Select, Taiwan, 412
        • Recruiting
        • National Cheng Kung University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 63 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of mild to severe OSA in the past year
  • Age between 20-65 years old.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A history of malignancy or infection of the head and neck region and laryngeal trauma
  • Craniofacial malformation
  • Stroke
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • Heart failure
  • Coronary artery disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Control
Without the willingness of surgery, those participants waiting for oral appliance (Device), losing weights and using continuous positive airway pressure (Device) were distribute to control group.
It is a kind of treatment for the participants who refuse surgeries and choose to use other kinds of conservative treatment. The conservative treatments included oral appliance, losing weights and using continuous positive airway pressure. The oral appliance would be wore only at night and it would press the soft palate and protrude the jaw.
The participants only used CPAP at night. The device composed of a main machine, pipe and mask. The participants would instruct to wore the mask. The main machine would give positive airway pressure to open the airway and avoid collapsing.
Other Names:
  • CPAP
The participants would ask to lose weight by changing their diets and exercising, without using drugs and surgeries.
Experimental: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS)
The participants underwent TORS. TORS is a kind of surgery that the surgeons would remove the tonsils and the fat tissue of tongue base and suspend the soft palate.
transoral robotic surgery (TORS) which remove the extra soft tissue of the base of the tongue and soft palate in this study
Experimental: TORS+OPR
The participants started OPR 6 weeks after TORS. Each exercise was repeated 10 times, 1-3 cycles per day, 3-5 sessions per week at their home and performed for 3 months. Patients were supervised by physical therapist once a week for 30 minutes.
transoral robotic surgery (TORS) which remove the extra soft tissue of the base of the tongue and soft palate in this study
OPR included exercise for soft palate, tongue and oropharynx. There are 13 movements in OPR. The movements would be teach by a physical therapist.
Other Names:
  • OPR

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline Apnea and Hypopnea index (AHI) at 6 months
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
Polysomnography included electroencephalographic, electro-oculographic, thoracic and abdominal respiratory inductance plethysmography and body position sensor to confirm the sleeping stage in one-night observation. Above measurements will be aggregated to arrive AHI.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Change from Baseline Volume from hard palate to the base of epiglottis in computer tomography (CT) at 6 months
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
All patients underwent CT in a supine position. Each patient was instructed to maintain his/her tongue in the resting position, without swallowing, during CT. Volume from hard palate to the base of epiglottis was measured.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Change from Baseline Cross section area on the tip of epiglottis in computer tomography (CT) at 6 months
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
All patients underwent CT in a supine position. Each patient was instructed to maintain his/her tongue in the resting position, without swallowing, during CT. Cross section area on the tip of epiglottis was measured.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Change from Baseline Anterior to posterior distance on the tip of epiglottis in computer tomography (CT) at 6 months
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
All patients underwent CT in a supine position. Each patient was instructed to maintain his/her tongue in the resting position, without swallowing, during CT. Anterior to posterior distance on the tip of epiglottis was measured.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Change from Baseline Lateral distance on the tip of epiglottis in computer tomography (CT) at 6 months
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
All patients underwent CT in a supine position. Each patient was instructed to maintain his/her tongue in the resting position, without swallowing, during CT. Lateral distance on the tip of epiglottis was measured.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Change from Baseline Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) at 6 months
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
DISE was carried out by an experienced ENT surgeon in a semi-dark and quiet operating room with the patient supine lying on a hospital bed. Artificial sleep was induced by intravenous injection of propofol and midazolam (bolus injection of 1.5 mg) through a target-controlled infusion system (1.5 to 3.0 lg/mL), intending to the transition to unconsciousness with beginning of snoring and with the examiner evaluating decreased muscle reflexes of the eyelid. The severity of collapse in the upper airway was assessed by the surgeon.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Change from Baseline Muscle Strength of Jaw at 6 months
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
Muscle strength of jaw was measured with a 'handheld' dynamometer (MicroFET○R2, Hoggan Scientific, USA) mounted on an adapted ophthalmic examination frame, to avoid alterations in chin and head position and to ensure consistent compression.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Change from Baseline Muscle strength of tongue at 6 months
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
The muscle strength of the tongue was evaluated by the IOPI system, model 2.2 (Northwest, Co., LLC, Carnation, WA, USA).
through study completion, an average of 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

Clinical Trials on oral appliance

3
Subscribe