Pathologist Lung Transplant Study

February 3, 2022 updated by: Blake Gibson, University of Pittsburgh

Pathologist Led Intervention To Improve Psychological Outcomes and Adherence in Lung Transplant Patients

Using a prospective qualitative approach, explore whether pathologist intervention is feasible as part of multimodal multidisciplinary care model for transplant patients in effecting psychological dimensions such as experience, satisfaction, or patient's understanding of their disease. Additionally, to examine if this intervention improves medication adherence.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Detailed Description

Specific Aims 1. Create post-transplant pathologist-led intervention Objective 1a: Recruit 10 patients who have undergone lung transplantation primarily for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Use pathologist to show gross/microscopic explanted organs.

Specific Aim 2. Assess the efficacy of intervention pilot Objective 2a: Immediate (within 1 day after pathologist intervention) phone interview to access patient's reaction, feelings, and experience with intervention and understanding of disease.

Objective 2b: 1 month later, phone interview asking questions related to medication adherence, patient experience with intervention and lung transplant overall, and patient understanding of disease. Results will be compared to first interview.

Objective 2c: Analyze Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) for quality of life, Basel assessment of adherence to immunosuppressive medications scale (BAASIS) as a self report adherence measure, and conduct a mixed methods/grounded theory analysis of qualitative data (patient experience, disease understanding). This analysis will systematically identify themes, and assign these descriptive words.

Specific Aim 3: Finalize intervention protocol based on pilot testing. Objective 3a. Adjust and refine the content and process of intervention protocol based on findings of pilot study Objective 3b. Final changes will assure readiness for large scale study.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • UPMC Presbyterian Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Lung transplant patient, transplanted after IRB approval of study -Transplanted primarily for COPD
  • English speaking
  • within three months of initial transplant (prior to initial discharge)
  • > 18 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Transplant indication other than COPD
  • <18 year old
  • Non English speaking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Patient viewing ex-planted organ and microscopy with pathologist
viewing explanted organ and microscopy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medication Scale (BAASIS©)
Time Frame: one day after intervention and assessment for change one month later

The Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medication Scale (BAASIS©) was developed to assess adherence to immunosuppressive drugs in adult and adolescent transplant recipients. Initiation starts when a patient takes his/her first dose of medication. This is a binary event (yes/no). Implementation of the dosing regimen refers to "the extent to which a patient's actual dosing corresponds to the prescribed dosing regimen, from initiation until the last dose is taken" and implies a dosing history.

Discontinuation refers to "the moment that the patient discontinues his/her medication regimen" and is assessed as a time to event. Persistence is thus the duration between time of initiation and the moment the last dose is taken. Any yes response demonstrates issues with medication adherence.

one day after intervention and assessment for change one month later
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
Time Frame: one day after intervention and assessment for change one month later
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire is an 8 item measure of client satisfaction. An "overall score" is calculated by summing the respondent's rating (item rating) score for each scale item. Scores therefore range from 8 to 32, with higher values indicating higher satisfaction. with services with both a parent intervention versus averages of lung transplant patients.
one day after intervention and assessment for change one month later

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient understanding
Time Frame: one day after intervention and assessment for change one month later
Assess if patient has gained more understanding of their condition. No specific scale used, assessed by interview.
one day after intervention and assessment for change one month later
Patient experience
Time Frame: one day after intervention and assessment for change one month later
Discussing patient's overall experience. No specific scale used, assessed by interview.
one day after intervention and assessment for change one month later

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Blake Gibson, MD, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Western Psychiatric Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY19060024

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adherence, Patient

Clinical Trials on Pathologist intervention

3
Subscribe