Piezo-surgery Technique and Intramuscular Dexamethasone Injection to Reduce Postoperative Pain After Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery

Piezo-surgery Technique and Intramuscular Dexamethasone Injection to Reduce Postoperative Pain After Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The purpose of my study is to test the effect of using piezosurgery and dexamethasone injection in the surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars, on Postoperative Pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Third molar surgery is the most common procedure performed in oral and maxillofacial surgery practice.

This procedure is always associated with varying degrees of postoperative pain and swelling that may have a social impact. Traditionally, rotating instruments like burs have been used for osseous surgery.

Piezosurgery is a novel technique introduced to overcome the disadvantages associated with the conventional rotatory technique. Corticosteroids administration before or after the extraction of third molars is an efficient way to minimize postoperative pain due to their strong anti-inflammatory activity.

Many researchers conducted studies comparing the piezosurgery technique with conventional rotatory technique, regarding postoperative pain and working time, or studies comparing the conventional method with or without dexamethasone injection. Only one recent study (Nov 2018), conducted by Gümrükçü Z. et al. has compared Piezosurgery and dexamethasone injection in third molar surgery, but without evaluating the combined effect of these two techniques on postoperative pain.

Objectives: The objective of this study is to assess the effects of piezosurgery technique and intramuscular dexamethasone injection on postoperative pain in impacted third molar surgery.

Methods: The study design is a randomized controlled clinical trial: 80 patients with mandibular third molar impaction, indicated for surgical extraction should be treated randomly using either the piezosurgery or the conventional rotatory technique, and with or without intramuscular dexamethasone injection. Postoperative pain will be assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) on days 1, 3, and seven postoperatively.

The differences in Post-operative pain within and between study groups (4 groups) will be tested using repeated measures of analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Friedman tests. Differences in working time among the three techniques will be assessed using a repeated measure of ANOVA. All statistical tests will be two-sided, and the significant level will be set at 0.05. All the analysis will be conducted using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 22.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beirut, Lebanon, 1100
        • Central Military Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 30 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age from 15 to 30 years,
  • Having mandibular impacted third molars,

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Heavy smokers (≥20 cigarettes),
  • Uncontrolled systemic conditions,
  • Infection of the surgery site,
  • Psychological problems,
  • History of allergy to dexamethasone, amoxicillin, or acetaminophen.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Rotatory Instruments without Dexamethasone injection
Surgical extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar using conventional rotatory instruments to perform osteotomy without Intramuscular Dexamethasone injection
Surgical extraction using conventional rotatory instruments to perform osteotomy
Experimental: Rotatory Instruments with Dexamethasone injection
Surgical extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar using conventional rotatory instruments to perform osteotomy with 8 mg Intramuscular Dexamethasone injection 30 min before surgery
Compare the effect of dexamethasone injection on reducing post-op pain after impacted third molar Surgery
Experimental: Piezosurgery technique without Dexamethasone injection
Surgical extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar using the piezosurgery technique without Intramuscular Dexamethasone injection
Surgical extraction using conventional rotatory instruments to perform osteotomy
Compare the effect of Piezosurgery device use on reducing post-op pain after impacted third molar Surgery
Experimental: Piezosurgery technique with Dexamethasone injection
Surgical extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar using the piezosurgery technique with 8 mg Intramuscular Dexamethasone injection 30 min before surgery
Compare the effect of dexamethasone injection on reducing post-op pain after impacted third molar Surgery
Compare the effect of Piezosurgery device use on reducing post-op pain after impacted third molar Surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Postoperative Pain level From Baseline
Time Frame: Days 1, 3, and 7 Post-op
Postoperative Pain level using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): 100 mm in length ranging from 0 for " no pain" to 100 for "the worse imaginable pain
Days 1, 3, and 7 Post-op
Working time
Time Frame: Per-op
Surgery time from the start of the incision until the end of the suturing (min).
Per-op

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change oh The maximal mouth opening From Baseline
Time Frame: At Day 0 and Day 3
The maximal mouth opening, previously taken at Day 0 was measured at day three post-op, and expressed in millimeters (mm).
At Day 0 and Day 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Extraction

Clinical Trials on Conventional Rotatory instruments

3
Subscribe