The Relationship Between COVID-19 Anxiety Level and Emotional Eating in Individuals With Metabolic Syndrome (COVID-19)

June 2, 2021 updated by: Dilekkucu Kalemdar, T.C. ORDU ÜNİVERSİTESİ

The Relationship Between Coronavirus Anxiety Level and Emotional Eating in Individuals With Metabolic Syndrome

The aim was to determine the coronavirus anxiety levels and emotional eating status of cases with diagnosis of MetS according to diagnostic criteria published by the International Diabetic Federation (IDF) in 2005 and healthy individuals with similar BMI to MetS subjects.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim was to determine the coronavirus anxiety levels and emotional eating status of cases with diagnosis of MetS according to diagnostic criteria published by the International Diabetic Federation (IDF) in 2005 and healthy individuals with similar BMI to MetS subjects. This study was completed with the descriptive, cross-sectional and relational screening model. The full sampling method was used in the study. The study was completed with 105 individuals with metabolic syndrome attending the diet clinic and 109 healthy individuals without MetS diagnosis also attending the diet clinic. Collection of data used anthropometric measurements and biochemical findings, blood pressure and a survey form, the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS) and Emotional Eating Scale (EES).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

214

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ordu, Turkey, 52000
        • Dilek alemdar

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Power analysis was performed using the G*Power (v3.1.9) program to determine the number of samples. According to Jacob Cohen's effect size coefficients, it was calculated that there should be at least 105 people in the groups for α=0.05 and 1-β=0.95 (95% power) levels, assuming that the evaluations between the two independent groups would have a medium effect size (d=0.5).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The research included individuals aged 18 years and older, who were not pregnant or breastfeeding, without any psychological disorder diagnosed by psychiatry, without diagnosis of COVID-19 and not using any psychiatric medications. The MetS group for the research included individuals with metabolic syndrome diagnosis according to IDF-2005 diagnostic criteria. The non MetS group in the research included healthy individuals not using any psychiatric medications, without any chronic disorder, and with similar BMI to the individuals in the subject group.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The research included individuals aged 18 years and older, who were pregnant or breastfeeding, with psychological disorder diagnosed by psychiatry, with diagnosis of COVID-19 and using psychiatric medications.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
MetS diagnosis
The research included individuals aged 18 years and older, who were not pregnant or breastfeeding, without any psychological disorder diagnosed by psychiatry, without diagnosis of COVID-19 and not using any psychiatric medications. The MetS group for the research included individuals with metabolic syndrome diagnosis according to IDF-2005 diagnostic criteria.
This study was completed with a descriptive, cross-sectional and relational screening model
Other Names:
  • This survey form
  • Biochemical findings (glucose, HDL, LDL, total cholesterol, triglycerides, CRP, HbA1c, insulin, HOMA-IR).
  • Blood pressure was measured and recorded.
  • The coronavirus anxiety scale (CAS) and emotional eating scale (EES) were applied.
non-MetS
The research included individuals aged 18 years and older, who were not pregnant or breastfeeding, without any psychological disorder diagnosed by psychiatry, without diagnosis of COVID-19 and not using any psychiatric medications. The non MetS group in the research included healthy individuals not using any psychiatric medications, without any chronic disorder, and with similar BMI to the individuals in the subject group.
This study was completed with a descriptive, cross-sectional and relational screening model
Other Names:
  • This survey form
  • Biochemical findings (glucose, HDL, LDL, total cholesterol, triglycerides, CRP, HbA1c, insulin, HOMA-IR).
  • Blood pressure was measured and recorded.
  • The coronavirus anxiety scale (CAS) and emotional eating scale (EES) were applied.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Coronavirus anxiety scale (CAS)
Time Frame: 5 month
Total points of ≥9 on the scale shows dysfunctional anxiety related to coronavirus.
5 month
Emotional eating scale (EES)
Time Frame: 5 month.
High points on the scale show high levels of emotional eating behavior.
5 month.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
BMI (Body Mass Index)
Time Frame: 5 month.
kg/m^2
5 month.
Glucose
Time Frame: 5 month.
mg/dL
5 month.
Blood pressure
Time Frame: 5 month.
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure
5 month.
HDL
Time Frame: 5 month.
mg/dL
5 month.
LDL
Time Frame: 5 month.
mg/dL
5 month.
triglycerides
Time Frame: 5 month.
mg/dL
5 month.
HbA1c
Time Frame: 5 month.
HbA1c (%)
5 month.
insulin
Time Frame: 5 month.
ng/ml
5 month.
HOMA-IR
Time Frame: 5 month.
index
5 month.
total cholesterol
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 month.
mg/dL
Through study completion, an average of 5 month.
CRP
Time Frame: 5 month.
mg/dL
5 month.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: DİLEK KÜÇÜK ALEMDAR, T.C. ORDU ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 12, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 30, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19

Clinical Trials on A survey form was applied to individuals included in the study face-to-face.

3
Subscribe