- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04933877
Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block. for Thoracotomy in Pediatric Patients
October 11, 2022 updated by: Ahmed Abdelaziz Ismail, Cairo University
Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block For Thoracotomy In Pediatric Patients: a Randomised Clinical Trial
This randomized controled trial is designed to compare efficacy and safty of serratus anterior plane block versus erector spinae plane block for thoracotomy in pediatric patients.
Study Overview
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
100
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Giza, Egypt, 11562
- Recruiting
- Misr University for Science and Technology
-
Contact:
- Ahmed Kareem, Ass. prof.
- Phone Number: 00201009750511
- Email: dr.ahmedkar@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
1 year to 10 years (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria
- Age 1 to 10-year-old
- ASA I, II, and II
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients whose parents or legal guardians refusing to participate.
- Preoperative mechanical ventilation.
- Preoperative inotropic drug infusion.
- Known or suspected coagulopathy.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Serratus Anterior Plan block
The SAPB was performed in the operative room (OR) after anesthesia induction using the same ultrasound machine (SonoSite) and linear ultrasound transducer 8- 12 Hz.
The patient was positioned in a lateral position with the operative side up and arm flexed forward; then, a linear ultrasound transducer was placed in a sagittal plane over the mid-clavicular line of the thoracic cage.
Then, moving inferior-lateral direction till the fifth rib was identified in the mid-axillary line.
The following structures were recognized: the rib, pleura, teres major muscle (superior), latissimus dorsi muscle (superficial and posterior), and serratus muscles muscle (deep and inferior).
Under complete sterile conditions, a 22-gauge echogenic needle was introduced in-plane with respect to the ultrasound probe targeting the plane deep to the serratus anterior muscle.
Then, 0.4 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine was injected with continuous ultrasound guidance.
|
Serratus anterior plane block
|
Active Comparator: Erector spinae plane block
Patients in Group ESPB receive US erector spinae plane block by injecting 0.4ml/kg (bupivacaine 0.25%).
Under strict aseptic precautions, The T3 spinous process is located by palpating and counting down from the C7 spinous process.
A high-frequency 12 MHz linear ultrasound transducer is placed in a longitudinal orientation 3 cm lateral to the T3 spinous process corresponding to the T2 transverse process.
Three muscles; trapezius (uppermost), rhomboids major (middle), and erector spinae (lowermost) will be identified superior to the hyperechoic transverse process.Using an in-plane approach a 22 G needle is inserted in caudal-cephalad direction until the tip is deep to erector spinae muscle.
Correct needle tip location is confirmed by injecting 3 mL of normal saline and visualizing the linear LA spread (i.e., hydrodissection) in the fascial plane between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process.
Then, bupivacaine is injected, and visualizing the fascial plane.
|
Serratus anterior plane block
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
post-operative fentanyl consumption
Time Frame: 9 month
|
amount of fentanyl in mic consumed in the 24 hours postoperatively
|
9 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
intraoperative fentanyl consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
total dose of fentanyl given during the surgical procedure
|
24 hours
|
FLACC score at 1,2,4,8,12,24 hours postoperatively
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
FLACC score ( Face Leg Activity Cry Consolability ) it is pediatric observational 10-point scale "Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) pain score. each point is given score between 0 and 2. the maximum score is 10 the lowest is 0 |
24 hours
|
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
satisfaction in numeric scale from1 to 5. 1 express the worst, and 5 express the best.
|
24 hours
|
RASS score
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
sedation score
|
24 hours
|
time of first rescue analgesi
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
duration of postoperative analgesia
|
24 hours
|
Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scale at 24 h postoperatively.
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scale at 24 h postoperatively.
|
24 hours
|
PONV
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
post operative nausea and vomiting
|
24 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Gaballah KM, Soltan WA, Bahgat NM. Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopy: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Jul;33(7):1946-1953. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.02.028. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
- Finnerty DT, McMahon A, McNamara JR, Hartigan SD, Griffin M, Buggy DJ. Comparing erector spinae plane block with serratus anterior plane block for minimally invasive thoracic surgery: a randomised clinical trial. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Nov;125(5):802-810. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.020. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 1, 2021
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
February 1, 2023
Study Completion (Anticipated)
April 1, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 8, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 14, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
June 22, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 13, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 11, 2022
Last Verified
October 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- N5098-2021
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
IPD is a confidential issue according to the policy of my institute.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anesthesia
-
Samsun UniversityCompletedAnesthesia | Regional Anesthesia | Anesthesia ManagementTurkey
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompletedAnesthesia, Local | Anesthesia | Anesthesia; Adverse EffectGermany
-
Novocol Pharmaceutical of Canada, Inc.CompletedAnesthesia, Local | Dental Anesthesia | Anesthesia, ReversalUnited States
-
Aligarh Muslim UniversityCompletedAnesthesia | Anesthesia Intubation Complication | Anesthesia; Adverse EffectIndia
-
Universitas Sebelas MaretIndonesia Endowment Fund for EducationNot yet recruitingAnesthesia | Anesthesia; Reaction
-
University of PecsCompleted
-
Hormozgan University of Medical SciencesUnknownAnesthesia | Anesthesia; FunctionalIran, Islamic Republic of
-
University of ChicagoRecruitingAnesthesia | Patient Satisfaction | Anesthesia Risks | Anesthesia Consent | Consent RetentionUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisINSERM UMR-942, Paris, France; M3DISIMRecruitingPrediction Models for Cardiovascular and Neurocognitive Disease Risk in the General Population (CME)Anesthesia, Local | AnesthesiaFrance
-
Matthew BorzageRecruitingAnesthesia | Anesthesia; ReactionUnited States
Clinical Trials on Fascial plane block
-
Seoul National University HospitalRecruitingPostoperative Pain, AcuteKorea, Republic of
-
ghada fouadEnrolling by invitationPostoperative Anelgesic Effect of Rhomboid Intercostal Nerve Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane BlockPost Operative PainEgypt
-
Eskisehir Osmangazi UniversityCompletedPain, Postoperative | Postoperative ComplicationsTurkey
-
Namik Kemal UniversityRecruiting
-
Zagazig UniversityRecruiting
-
The Cleveland ClinicNot yet recruiting
-
Taichung Veterans General HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
University of British ColumbiaCompletedPain, Postoperative | Anesthesia, RegionalCanada
-
Beni-Suef UniversityRecruitingPain | PostoperativeEgypt
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingParasternal Intercostal Nerve Block