Study Comparing Local/ MAC Anesthesia in Lumbar Decompression

March 18, 2026 updated by: Todd Alamin, Stanford University

Randomized Study Comparing Local/ MAC Anesthesia to General for 1-3 Level Lumbar Decompressions

Explore efficacy, complications, and other factors associated with anaesthetic choice- To evaluate the efficacy of local + MAC as an alternative anesthetic to general anesthesia and to analyze patients' outcomes and experiences.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

100 Patients ages 40-95 with lumbar stenosis to be decompressed are randomized to undergo the procedure with either general anesthesia or local anesthetic with MAC.

Participants will be randomized to either group 1 General anesthesia or group 2 Local + MAC anesthetic group.

Group 1: General Anesthesia: Medically induced unconsciousness that suppresses reflexes and requires intubation (a tube inserted through the mouth and into the airway) to assist in breathing.

Group 2: Local + MAC: Local anesthetic (lidocaine) injected into the site of the incision/dissection with additional IV medication (Propofol) to achieve a state in which the patient is generally aware, but relaxed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • Redwood City, California, United States, 94063
        • Recruiting
        • Outpatient Surgery Center/Stanford Spine Clinic
        • Contact:
      • Redwood City, California, United States, 94608
        • Recruiting
        • Stanford Outpatient surgery center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Todd F Alamin, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 95 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients with lumbar stenosis to be decompressed over 1-3 segments

  • Ages 40-95
  • Appropriate for general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Planned significant nerve root retraction
  • Previous fusion operation
  • Unable to comply with follow up
  • Patients with daily morphine equivalents or more 100mg
  • Patients with a known hypersensitivity to propofol or any of DIPRIVAN Injectable Emulsion components.
  • Patients with allergies to eggs, egg products, soybeans or soy products.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: General anesthesia

Patients under this group will be undergoing lumbar decompression surgery with general anesthesia:

General Anesthesia: Medically induced unconsciousness that suppresses reflexes and requires intubation (a tube inserted through the mouth and into the airway) to assist in breathing.

25mg Propofol administered by injection
Active Comparator: Monitored Anesthetic Care (MAC)/Local

Patients under this group wil be undergoing limbar decompression surgery with Monitored Anesthetic care, (MAC)/Local.

Local + MAC: Local anesthetic (lidocaine) injected into the site of the incision/dissection with additional IV medication (Propofol) to achieve a state in which the patient is generally aware, but relaxed.

Licocaine administered locally via injection.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score
Time Frame: Basline through year 2
Scale is expressed as a percentage (0 to 100%). Higher score indicates more severe disability.
Basline through year 2
Change in patient reported pain
Time Frame: Basline through year 2
Measured on visual analog scale (VAS). Score range 0-10, 0= no pain and 10 = worst pain.
Basline through year 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Todd Alamin, MD, Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 5, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Clinical Trials on Propofol Injection

Subscribe