Pharmacokinetics of Calcineurin & mTOR Inhibitors in HIV-1 Infected Kidney Transplant Recipients After Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF (KINETIK)

Pharmacokinetics of Calcineurin & mTOR Inhibitors in HIV-1 Infected Kidney Transplant Recipients After Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF: a Pilot Study - KINETIK (KIdNEy Transplant bIKtarvy) IMEA 064

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a critical comorbidity for patients living with HIV (PLWH), with an estimated prevalence between 2.4 and 17%, leading to end-stage renal disease 3 to 6 fold more than non-HIV population. However kidney transplantation for PLWH has become the first-line therapy for end-stage renal disease, with an enhanced survival benefit compared to remaining on dialysis.

Management of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in HIV-infected kidney transplant recipients (HIV-KTR) has historically been problematic because of the potential nephrotoxicity of some antiretroviral drugs and the interactions between calcineurin inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors, and ritonavir or cobicistat-boosted containing-ART. The use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), a widely recommended nucleotide analogue for the treatment of both HIV and HIV/hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection, is restricted in vulnerable kidney population as HIV-KTR due to its major potential toxicity consistent with tubular dysfunction and rarely with a progressive sustained decline in renal function. The optimal long-term ART regimen is not known in HIV-KTR, though it makes intuitive sense to avoid regimens containing TDF, given its potential nephrotoxicity. Nevertheless the potent virological efficacy of TDF both on HIV and HBV and its highest in-vitro barrier to resistance among the Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors makes tenofovir use highly recommended or even essential in HIV/HBV co-infections.

Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) and bictegravir (BIC) are 2 novel antiretroviral drug available in HIV treatment in combination with emtricitabine (F) (B/F/TAF):

* TAF is a novel prodrug of tenofovir that may offer improved renal safety over TDF. TAF is more stable in plasma and is metabolized intracellularly by cathepsin A, an enzyme that is highly expressed in lymphoid tissues. Therefore, TAF can achieve higher intracellular levels of the active moiety tenofovir diphosphate, with lower levels of circulating tenofovir when compared with TDF. This more targeted treatment could potentially result in fewer renal and bone complications despite the same clinical efficacy as TDF. TAF was approved for use in PLWH with mild-moderate CKD (eGFR: 30-69 mL/min).

The availability of TAF seems a potential addition to the antiretroviral armamentarium in HIV-KTR. * BIC is a novel second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) has a high in-vitro barrier to resistance and in-vitro activity against most INSTI-resistant variants and has low potential for clinically meaningful drug-drug interactions. BIC has been recently approved by the FDA, in coformulated B/F/TAF for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in antiretroviral naïve subjects and in those with suppressed viremia.

No data are available yet with TAF use in HIV-infected kidney transplant recipients as well as with BIC, especially about potential drug-to-drug interactions with immunosuppressive drugs such as calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors.

At last simplification to a single tablet regimen (STR) may offer a once-daily option for HIV-KTR who have multiple comorbidities, often requires complex regimens with a high pill burden.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Créteil, France, 94010
        • Hôpital Henri Mondor
      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • Hôpital Hotel Dieu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HIV-1 infected patients > 18 years
  • Kidney transplant recipient ≥ 3 months
  • Receiving calcineurin and/or mTOR inhibitors without change in doses ≥ 4 weeks
  • Plasma HIV RNA ≤ 50 cpml ≥ 6 months (1 blip permitted <200cp/ml)
  • eGFR (CKD-EPI) ≥ 30 ml/mn/1.73m2
  • Written consent
  • GSS to BIC/FTC/TAF GSS ≥ 2
  • stable antiretroviral regimen for at least 3 months
  • Active contraception in potential child-bearing women

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy or intolerance to one of the following drug or to any of excipients: FTC, TDF, INSTI
  • HIV-2 or HIV-1/HIV-2 co-infection
  • Patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class C)
  • Patient without health coverage
  • Pregnancy and breast-feeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: BIC/FTC/TAF
Development phase 4: Biktarvy®
Multicenter Pilot study aiming to assess the safe use of BIC/FTC/TAF in HIV-KTR, using a single-arm design.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors' blood concentrations after switch to B/F/TAF
Time Frame: Week 2
Evolution of blood concentration
Week 2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
•Proportion in calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors' dose changes after switch to B/F/TAF
Time Frame: Baseline
PK of calcineurin and mTOR
Baseline
•Proportion in calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors' dose changes after switch to B/F/TAF
Time Frame: Week 2
PK of calcineurin and mTOR
Week 2
• Changes in plasma levels of calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors
Time Frame: Week 2,
Plasma levels concentrations
Week 2,
• Changes in plasma levels of calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors
Time Frame: Week 12,
Plasma levels concentrations
Week 12,
• Changes in plasma levels of calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors
Time Frame: Week 24,
Plasma levels concentrations
Week 24,
• Changes in plasma levels of calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors
Time Frame: Week 48
Plasma levels concentrations
Week 48
• B/F/TAF plasma levels
Time Frame: Week 4
B/F/TAF PK
Week 4
• Change in mGFR (iohexol clearance)
Time Frame: Baseline,
evolution of mGFR
Baseline,
• Change in mGFR (iohexol clearance)
Time Frame: Week 48
evolution of mGFR
Week 48
• Change in bone markers
Time Frame: Baseline,
bone markers and bone mineral density evolution
Baseline,
• Change in bone mineral density
Time Frame: Baseline,
bone markers and bone mineral density evolution
Baseline,
• Change in bone mineral density
Time Frame: Week 48
bone markers and bone mineral density evolution
Week 48
• Change in bone markers
Time Frame: Week 48
bone markers and bone mineral density evolution
Week 48
• Incidence of proximal tubulopathy
Time Frame: W48
(hypouricemia, hypophosphatemia, low molecular weight proteinuria, orthoglycemic glycosuria) analysis
W48
• Incidence of proximal tubulopathy
Time Frame: Baseline
(hypouricemia, hypophosphatemia, low molecular weight proteinuria, orthoglycemic glycosuria) analysis
Baseline
• Change in eGFR evaluated with plasma or serum Cystatin C
Time Frame: Baseline
evolution of eGFR
Baseline
• Change in eGFR evaluated with plasma or serum Cystatin C
Time Frame: Week 48
evolution of eGFR
Week 48
• graft Survival
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
defined as the necessity to return to dialysis, or death
Baseline to Week 48
• Change in plasma metabolome
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
(Indoxyl sulfate, indole-3-acetic acid, Hippuric acid, para-cresol sulfate, 3-carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furanpropanoic acid (CMPF) analysis
Baseline to Week 48
• Incidence of Grade ≥3 adverse events up
Time Frame: baseline to Week48
adverse event≥3 reported
baseline to Week48
• Incidence of specific calcineurin inhibitors
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
histological renal damage performed (if graft biopsy )
Baseline to Week 48
• Antiretroviral therapy changes during the follow-up through
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
Antiretroviral therapy changes
Baseline to Week 48
• Calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors' drug dose changes
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
Calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors' drug dose changes
Baseline to Week 48
• Proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNA ≤ 50 cp/mL
Time Frame: Week 48
Proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNA ≤ 50 cp/mL
Week 48
• Change CD4 cell count, ratio CD4/CD8
Time Frame: Baseline
Immunology evolution
Baseline
• Change CD4 cell count, ratio CD4/CD8
Time Frame: Week 24
Immunology evolution
Week 24
• Change CD4 cell count, ratio CD4/CD8
Time Frame: Week 48
Immunology evolution
Week 48
• proportion of participants with virological failure
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
defined as two consecutive HIV RNA VL>50 copies/mL or a HIV RNA >50 copies/mL followed by a study treatment discontinuation"
Baseline to Week 48
• Change in GSS* after switch to B/F/TAF Genotypic Susceptibility Score (GSS) to B/F/TAF
Time Frame: baseline to Week 48
GSS ≥ 2
baseline to Week 48
• Adherence, HIV Treatment Satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline,
adherence and satisfactory questionnaire
Baseline,
• Adherence, HIV Treatment Satisfaction
Time Frame: Week12,
adherence and satisfactory questionnaire
Week12,
• Adherence, HIV Treatment Satisfaction
Time Frame: ,Week 24,
adherence and satisfactory questionnaire
,Week 24,
• Adherence, HIV Treatment Satisfaction
Time Frame: Week36,
adherence and satisfactory questionnaire
Week36,
• Adherence, HIV Treatment Satisfaction
Time Frame: Week48
adherence and satisfactory questionnaire
Week48

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 29, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IMEA 064

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV-infected Patient Kidney Transplant Recipient

Clinical Trials on Biktarvy Tab

3
Subscribe