Bread Replacement - Facing the Challenge to Improve Its Quality for Better Metabolic Health

December 1, 2023 updated by: University of Bergen

This is a multicenter study testing the effect of bread containing beta-glucan on glycemic control in participants with intermediate hyperglycemia. The main hypothesis of the study is that bread enriched with beta-glucan will have a positive effect on blood glucose control (HbA1c) in persons with intermediate hyperglycemia.

Bread (intervention and control) will be produced by Nofima (Ås, Norway) using food-grade beta-glucan from oat and barley and shipped to the study centers (Bergen (N), Gothenburg (S), Paderborn, and Leipzig (D)) and there distributed for free to the participants of the study. The study will last for 16 weeks with measurements at baseline, after 8 weeks and after 16 weeks. Blood and urine samples will be taken, anthropometry and body composition measured, and questionnaires on health status and socio-economic status, physical activity, nicotine use, alcohol habits, chronotype, quality of life, and consumer acceptance of the study bread will be filled in.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Carbohydrates are the main source of energy in most European countries with intakes ranging from 40-60% of total energy. Consequently, the role of its quality and quantity for the development of metabolic diseases is the focus of substantial debate. Notwithstanding, replacing processed carbohydrates with unprocessed carbohydrates is regarded as a major strategy to improve public health. This is to a substantial degree based on strong observational evidence that higher intakes of dietary fiber (cereal grains containing the same relative proportions of bran, germ, and endosperm as the intact caryopsis) are associated with lower risks of total mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, and mortality, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) incidence and cancer mortality. Nonetheless, data from medium- to long-term intervention studies among adults are less conclusive regarding the benefits of whole-grain consumption on glycemic control, bodyweight and serum lipids. In fact, benefits may be largely confined to whole grains stemming from oats or barley, calling for explicit consideration of these whole grains and/or its mechanistically relevant component.

Adding complexity, many commonly consumed whole grains or products rich in dietary fiber are characterized by a high glycemic index (GI>70), in fact, a high dietary fiber content will not predict a low glycemic response. The GI describes the glycemic potency of the available carbohydrates in a food, is measured under defined conditions and is used to calculate the glycemic load (GL: GI x amount of available carbohydrates). Preferred consumption of high GI grain products is of concern since a higher dietary GI and GL may be causally linked to a substantial increase in T2DM risk and may translate into a considerable health burden.

In European societies, T2DM prevalence is increasing as a result of higher overweight and obesity rates and increases in longevity. Efforts are hence needed to develop carbohydrate-based food items that are both rich in fiber and whole grain and have a low GI and tailored to the dietary habits of middle-aged adults with insulin resistance (also called 'pre-diabetes' or intermediate hyperglycemia defined by intermediately increased HbA1c levels). This stage precedes clinical T2DM and affects up to 30% of adults in Western societies.

Enrichment with selected fibers, e.g. beta-glucan from oat and barley, may offer an alternative to whole grain kernel breads, which may not meet consumer preferences and is also endorsed by EFSA health claims. Preliminary small-scale studies indicate acute, short- and longer-term benefits of such bread for glycemic and/or insulinemic responses among persons with T2DM or at risk of T2DM. However, these studies suffer, besides the small sample sizes, from high amounts of test food (8 servings per day = 320 g bread) and use of white bread as a comparator. The present study will test whether habitual consumption of a bread containing oat bran concentrate and meeting the high beta-glucan content of the EFSA claim (4.3 g beta-glucan per 30 g available carbohydrate) compared to normal wheat bread high in whole grain but without kernels will affect glycemic control over a period of 16 weeks.

Main hypothesis The main hypothesis of the study is that bread enriched with beta-glucan will have a positive effect on blood glucose control (HbA1c) in persons with intermediate hyperglycemia.

Objectives Main objective: Establish whether replacement of habitual bread intake with a low GI bread containing beta-glucan improves glycemic control among persons at risk for T2DM.

Secondary objectives: Examine the effects of the intervention on capillary blood glucose, body composition and serum lipid levels, and address consumer acceptance of the intervention bread.

Study procedures This is a multicenter study testing the effect of bread containing beta-glucan on glycemic control in participants with intermediate hyperglycemia.

Breads (intervention and control) will be produced by Nofima (Ås) using food-grade beta-glucan from oat and barley and shipped to the study centers (Bergen (N), Gothenburg (S), Paderborn and Leipzig (D)) and there distributed for free to the participants of the study. The study will last for 16 weeks with measurements at baseline, after 8 weeks and after 16 weeks. Blood and urine samples will be taken, anthropometry and body composition measured, and questionnaires on health status, chronotype, lifestyle, and acceptance of the breads will be filled in.

Recruitment of participants Each study site is responsible for the recruitment of the planned numbers of participants. Potential participants will be recruited through flyers and information to local General Practitioners, advertising in local newspapers, central and local social media announcements (websites of universities, Facebook). Potentially eligible participants will be invited to a screening visit and checked for eligibility and exclusion of undiagnosed 2TDM.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

155

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bergen, Norway, 5021
        • University of Bergen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HbA1c 35-50 mmol/mol
  • BMI ≥ 27 m2/kg
  • regular bread eaters
  • freezing capacity of at least 2 bread

Exclusion Criteria:

  • chronic diseases like T2DM, CVD, cancer (within the last three years)
  • unknown or untreated hypertension >160/100 mmHg
  • celiac diseases, intolerance, or allergies for nuts, milk, eggs, wheat, mustard, seeds
  • use of anti-diabetic drugs
  • pregnancy and breastfeeding
  • patients planned to have or had a bariatric surgery
  • alcohol abuse

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Beta-glucan bread
Frozen bread is administered to the participants for home storage. Bread is thawed at home before consumption. Dosage: At least 3 slices of bread 6 days per week for 16 weeks
Frozen bread is administered to the participants for home storage. Bread is thawed at home before consumption. Dosage: At least 3 slices of bread 6 days per week for 16 weeks
Placebo Comparator: Control bread
Frozen bread is administered to the participants for home storage. Bread is thawed at home before consumption. Dosage: At least 3 slices of bread 6 days per week for 16 weeks
Frozen bread is administered to the participants for home storage. Bread is thawed at home before consumption. Dosage: At least 3 slices of bread 6 days per week for 16 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Glycemic control
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Measurement of HbA1c
16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
fasting capillary blood glucose
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Measurement of fasting capillary glucose
16 weeks
Body weight
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Measurement of body weight
16 weeks
Lipids
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Measurement of total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides
16 weeks
Consumer acceptance
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Questionnaire on consumer acceptance (scale 1-9, 9 indicates "tastes really good" or "very hungry")
8 weeks
Liver enzymes
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Measurement of serum concentrations of ALAT (U/L) and ASAT (U/L)
16 weeks
Fecal Microbiota
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Analyse the change in the composition of the fecal microbiota using 16S sequencing
16 weeks
Continuous blood glucose measurements
Time Frame: 1 week at baseline and after 16 weeks
Measurement of Continuous blood glucose in a sub-population
1 week at baseline and after 16 weeks
Compliance
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Compliance of the intervention/control will be evaluated using compliance journals and 24-hour recalls as the basis for sensitivity analysis.
16 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jutta Dierkes, PhD, University of Bergen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 7, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 4, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 727565

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hyperglycemia

Clinical Trials on Beta-glucan bread

3
Subscribe