Virtual Walking Intervention for Neuropathic Pain in Spinal Cord Injury (VRWalk)

August 17, 2023 updated by: Virginia Commonwealth University

A Multisite Randomized Clinical Trial to Examine the Efficacy and Mechanisms of Immersive Virtual Walking Treatment for Neuropathic Pain in Spinal Cord Injury

The purpose of this study is to determine if playing a virtual reality walking game can help improve neuropathic pain in adults with chronic spinal cord injury.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Many people with SCI experience neuropathic pain. Neuropathic pain is often described as sharp, burning, or electric. 'Traditional' treatments often do not do a good job at reducing neuropathic pain. Therefore, it is important to see if 'non-traditional' treatments might work. Scientists think that neuropathic pain occurs in SCI because the sensations coming from the eyes and up the spinal cord to the brain do not match what the brain thinks it told the body to do. This 'mis-match' may result in changes in the brain that make neuropathic pain possible. Virtual reality walking reduces this 'mis-match.' It does this by creating the 'illusion' that the person is walking. The brain then thinks it is telling the body to walk AND the information coming from the eyes matches its instructions. This 'matching' may reverse the brain changes that made neuropathic pain possible.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

250

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
        • Recruiting
        • University of New South Wales
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sylvia Gustin, PhD
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • Recruiting
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Rachel Cowan, PhD
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23236
        • Recruiting
        • Virginia Commonwealth University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Olivier Rolin, PhD, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The study will recruit individuals with complete and incomplete injury (American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] classification A, B, C, D) with lumbar, paraplegic, or low tetraplegic (C5-C7) injury. Additional criterial will include:

    1. persistent NP symptoms that are of daily severity of at least 4/10 for 3 or more months
    2. endorsement of more than 2 items on a 7-item Spinal Cord Injury Pain Instrument, SCIPI
    3. age of 18 or older
    4. more than one-year post-injury
    5. neuropathic pain during the last 7 days
    6. ability to move elbows against gravity
    7. must have mobile connectivity with usable service)
    8. SCIPI and DN4 scores for neuropathic pain must be 2 or more
    9. must be stable on pain medication for 1 or more months
    10. must be cleared on the VRWalk physical activity clearance scale

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Not meeting injury type criteria
  2. Not meeting NP criteria
  3. Age 17 or less
  4. Less than a year following injury
  5. Inability to comprehend spoken English
  6. Prisoners
  7. must not have motion sickness that interferes with daily life
  8. blind

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Virtual reality (VR) game 1
Participants will be asked to play a virtual reality game twice a day for 10 days.

Individuals playing VR game 1 will wear a head-mounted display to allow them to visualize virtual legs in the virtual environment. When wearing the display, individuals will see the legs and arms of their virtual avatar from a first-person perspective.

Individuals will engage in virtual reality sessions in their home twice daily over the course of 10 days in a two-week period. Each daily session will take approximately 30 minutes, with 5-10 minutes dedicated to the virtual walking experience. Additionally, each daily session will be scheduled a minimum of 4 hours apart.

Active Comparator: Virtual reality (VR) game 2
Participants will be asked to play a virtual reality game twice a day for 10 days.

Individuals playing VR game 2 will wear a head-mounted display to allow them to visualize virtual legs in the virtual environment. When wearing the display, individuals will see the legs and arms of their virtual avatar from a first-person perspective.

Individuals will engage in virtual reality sessions in their home twice daily over the course of 10 days in a two-week period. Each daily session will take approximately 30 minutes, with 5-10 minutes dedicated to the virtual walking experience. Additionally, each daily session will be scheduled a minimum of 4 hours apart.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain Intensity
Time Frame: Baseline - final follow up (up to 18 months)
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) measures pain intensity via 0-10 numeric rating scale 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.
Baseline - final follow up (up to 18 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain Quality
Time Frame: Baseline - final follow up (up to 18 months)
The Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) assesses the distinct pain qualities including sharpness, heat/cold, dullness, intensity, overall unpleasantness, and surface vs. deep pain. The NPS consists of 10 items. All the items are rated 0-10 scale, with higher score indicative of more neuropathic pain for each type of respective pain.
Baseline - final follow up (up to 18 months)
Change in Pain Interference
Time Frame: Baseline - final follow up (up to 18 months)
The International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set version 2.0 interference assesses the degree to which pain interferes with day-to-day activities, mood, and sleep. Items are scored on a 0-10 numeric rating scale and scores are summed to yield an interference score ranging from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate greater interference from pain.
Baseline - final follow up (up to 18 months)
Post treatment change
Time Frame: at follow up (up to 18 months)

The Patient Global Impression of Change is a one item 7 point Likert item assessing improvement of the participants overall status. Higher scores indicate less perceived improvement.

Range of scores: 1-7

at follow up (up to 18 months)
Change in mood
Time Frame: Baseline - final follow up (up to 18 months)
Mood will be assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Participants will be asked to rate have how often they have been bothered by specific problems on a 4-point Likert scale. The items are summed to yield a score ranging from 0-27. Higher scores indicate worse mood.
Baseline - final follow up (up to 18 months)
Change in quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline - final follow up (up to 18 months)

Quality of life is assessed by the Satisfaction with Life Scale. This is a 5 item survey. Response options are a 7-point Likert scale. Items may be assessed individually or by summing items.

Range of scores: 5-35. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction in life

Baseline - final follow up (up to 18 months)
Neurological changes
Time Frame: Baseline - 6 months
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) will be used to observe neurological changes. Pre and post study images will be compared by experienced researchers.
Baseline - 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zina Trost, PhD, Virginia Commonwealth University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 23, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuropathic Pain

Clinical Trials on VR Game 1

3
Subscribe