A New Ligation Using the Double-loop Clips Technique Versus Traditional Techniques in the Treatment of Large Wounds After Endoscopic Resection

January 12, 2022 updated by: Ningbo No. 1 Hospital

Feasibility of a New Ligation Using the Double-loop Clips Technique Versus Traditional Techniques in the Treatment of Large Wounds After Endoscopic Resection: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Studies have shown that postoperative inflammation can be relieved by clipping the wound, and can reduce the bleeding rate and perforation rate.Scholars at home and abroad have proposed the use of adhesives and circular surgical lines to clamp the wound.In 2019, Satoshi Abiko and others proposed the use of double-loop clips technology to clamp the wound, and make double-loop clips of appropriate length outside the body.Therefore, our study is a prospective randomized controlled study to explore whether the double-loop clips technique is safe and effective for larger wounds in daily clinical work.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

56

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Zhejiang
      • Ningbo, Zhejiang, China, 315000
        • Recruiting
        • Ningbo First Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with wounds larger than 20mm
  • Patients aged 18 to 75 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have a serious medical condition, such as heart failure, acute liver failure, severe kidney disease (dialysis or predialysis patients) or New York heart association class iii-iv.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Allergy or intolerance to any study drug.
  • Patients who have taken anticoagulant drugs (aspirin, clopidogrel, etc.) in the past week but are contraindicated for endoscopic polyp treatment.
  • Other imaging findings suggest patients with advanced cancer.
  • Patients with severe gastrointestinal diseases, such as intestinal obstruction or perforation, active ulcerative colitis, toxic colitis, and toxic megacolon

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: DLCT
After finding polyps that meet the inclusion criteria, the surgical method for resection was selected according to the operator's preferences, and the experimental group used double-loop coil clamp technology to treat the wound.
a new ligation method using the double-loop clips (D-L clips) technique
Active Comparator: Traditional technology
After finding polyps that meet the inclusion criteria, the surgical method for resection was selected according to the operator's preferences.The control group used the traditional hemostatic clip technique to treat the wound
the Titanium Clip
Other Names:
  • Traditional technology

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
complete closure rate
Time Frame: 1 hour
Main outcome was complete clip closure of the mucosal resection defect. The defect was considered completely closed when there was no remaining visible mucosal defect and clips were <1cm apart.
1 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operating time
Time Frame: 1 hour
The time from when the first clip is hit until it is completely closed
1 hour
Closing speed
Time Frame: 1 hour
Resection area divided by clamping time
1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 3, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Polyps

Clinical Trials on double-loop clips

3
Subscribe