- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05062265
Internal Brace Augmented Anterior Inferior Tibiofibular Ligament Repair: Post-operative Syndesmotic Volumes.
January 28, 2025 updated by: Blake E. Moore, MD, Vann Virginia Center for Orthopaedics dba Atlantic Orthopaedic Specialists
Internal Brace Augmented Anterior Inferior Tibiofibular Ligament Repair and Its Post-operative Effects on Syndesmotic Volumes: A Prospective, Single-blinded, Randomized Study
Over the course of a year from the start of the research study, twenty subjects will be randomized evenly into one of two groups after an informed consent is obtained: a traditional tight rope fixation group or a tight rope fixation with an anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) repair augmentation with an internal brace group.
Postoperative reduction was assessed by 3D volumetric ratios and measured by weight-bearing CT at 6-weeks and 3-months post-operation.
Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) were collected preoperatively, and at 6-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, and 1-year post-operation and included the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score and the 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (RAND-36) .
Differences in volumetric ratios and PROs were evaluated between groups and time periods.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
23
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Virginia
-
Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States, 23456
- Atlantic Orthopaedic Specialists
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients who fit the study injury list
Exclusion Criteria:
- smokers
- prior surgery on ankle
- bi-lateral surgery
- recent participation in another study within the last 90days
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Tight Rope Fixation
|
a traditional tight rope fixation is performed on one randomized set of subjects
|
|
Active Comparator: tight rope fixation w/ AITFL repair augmentation with an internal brace
|
A tight rope fixation with an anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) repair augmentation with an internal brace set of subjects to compare syndesmotic volume
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Syndesmotic Volumetric Ratio
Time Frame: 6-Weeks Post-op
|
use of weight-bearing CT scan to measure; In order to compare the 3D syndesmotic volume between groups, the volume ratio was calculated for each patient by dividing the syndesmotic volume of the operative ankle by the syndesmotic volume of the contralateral uninjured ankle
|
6-Weeks Post-op
|
|
Syndesmotic Volumetric Ratio
Time Frame: 3 months post-operative volume
|
use of weight-bearing CT scan to measure; In order to compare the 3D syndesmotic volume between groups, the volume ratio was calculated for each patient by dividing the syndesmotic volume of the operative ankle by the syndesmotic volume of the contralateral uninjured ankle
|
3 months post-operative volume
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (RAND-36) Summary Scores
Time Frame: 6 weeks post-operative
|
The RAND-36 is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of 36 questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health.
Scores are 00-100.
Higher scores equate to better quality of life and inverse for lower scores.
The Physical Health Component and Mental Health Component summary scores were calculated using the oblique method to reduce the risk of underrepresenting mental health scores.
|
6 weeks post-operative
|
|
RAND-36 Summary Scores
Time Frame: 3 months post-operative
|
The Short Form-36 (SF-36 or RAND-36) is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of 36 questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health.
Scores are 00-100.
Higher scores equate to better quality of life and inverse for lower scores.
The Physical Health Component and Mental Health Component summary scores were calculated using the oblique method to reduce the risk of underrepresenting mental health scores.
|
3 months post-operative
|
|
RAND-36 Summary Scores
Time Frame: 6 months post-operative
|
The SF-36 is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of 36 questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health.
Scores are 00-100.
Higher scores equate to better quality of life and inverse for lower scores.
The Physical Health Component and Mental Health Component summary scores were calculated using the oblique method to reduce the risk of underrepresenting mental health scores.
|
6 months post-operative
|
|
RAND-36 Summary Scores
Time Frame: 1 year post-operative
|
The SF-36 is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of 36 questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health.
Scores are 00-100.
Higher scores equate to better quality of life and inverse for lower scores.
The Physical Health Component and Mental Health Component summary scores were calculated using the oblique method to reduce the risk of underrepresenting mental health scores.
|
1 year post-operative
|
|
Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)
Time Frame: 6 weeks post-operative
|
FAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport(Rec), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL).
The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questionnaire.
Standardized answer options are given (% Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
|
6 weeks post-operative
|
|
Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)
Time Frame: 3 months post-operative
|
FAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport(Rec), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL).
The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questionnaire.
Standardized answer options are given (% Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
|
3 months post-operative
|
|
Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)
Time Frame: 6 months post-operative
|
FAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport(Rec), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL).
The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questionnaire.
Standardized answer options are given (% Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
|
6 months post-operative
|
|
Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)
Time Frame: 1 year post-operative
|
FAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport(Rec), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL).
The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questionnaire.
Standardized answer options are given (% Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
|
1 year post-operative
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Blake E Moore, MD, Vann Virginia Center for Orthopaedics dba Atlantic Orthopaedic Specialists
- Study Chair: Ashley Suttmiller, PhD, Clinical Researcher
- Study Director: Brice A Snyder, MSAT, Director of Clinical Research
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 31, 2022
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 31, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
December 31, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 27, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 20, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
September 30, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 25, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 28, 2025
Last Verified
January 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- AOS-0001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ligament Rupture
-
Universidade da CoruñaRecruitingLigament Rupture | Ligament Injury | Ligament DisordersPortugal
-
National Police HospitalCompletedRupture of Anterior Cruciate Ligament | Rupture of Posterior Cruciate LigamentKorea, Republic of
-
University Hospital DubravaArthrex GmbHNot yet recruitingCruciate Ligament Rupture | Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction | Cruciate Ligament Injury
-
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterNot yet recruitingWrist Injuries | Hand Injuries | Ligament Rupture | Ligament Injury | Ligament AvulsionUnited States
-
Goztepe Training and Research HospitalRecruitingAnkle Fractures | Ligament Rupture | Ligament InjuryTurkey
-
Aarhus University HospitalCompletedRupture of Anterior Cruciate Ligament | Ligament; Laxity, KneeDenmark
-
Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research HospitalNot yet recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction | Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury | Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) RuptureTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University of California, DavisBergstrom NutritionCompletedTendon Injuries | Ligament Injury | Ligament; Laxity | Tendon RuptureUnited States
-
Ascopharm Groupe NovascoRamsay Générale de SantéCompleted
-
La Tour HospitalToulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC - UMR 1214 Inserm/UPS)Not yet recruitingACL - Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Activation Failure | Contraction Mode
Clinical Trials on Tight rope fixation
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedOrthopedic Disorder | Orthopedic Devices Associated With Misadventures
-
Fresenius Medical Care Deutschland GmbHUniversity of Lisbon; Lisbon School of NursingCompletedChronic Kidney Diseases | Hemodialysis | Hemodialysis Access Failure | Arteriovenous Fistula | Vascular Access ComplicationPortugal
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingSpecial Senses DisordersPakistan
-
University of KwaZuluHeidelberg University; Technical University of Munich; Harvard School of Public... and other collaboratorsRecruitingModerate-vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA)South Africa
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruiting
-
University of South CarolinaTemple University; National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)Completed
-
Assiut UniversityCompleted
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)CompletedTransient Hypertension, PregnancyCanada
-
Lumenis Be Ltd.CompletedTo Verify Tissue Heating and Temperature Stability and Safety Throughout RF Treatment Duration Applied on the FaceUnited States
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityDalhousie UniversityWithdrawnMarital RelationshipCanada