Internal Brace Augmented Anterior Inferior Tibiofibular Ligament Repair: Post-operative Syndesmotic Volumes.

Internal Brace Augmented Anterior Inferior Tibiofibular Ligament Repair and Its Post-operative Effects on Syndesmotic Volumes: A Prospective, Single-blinded, Randomized Study

Over the course of a year from the start of the research study, twenty subjects will be randomized evenly into one of two groups after an informed consent is obtained: a traditional tight rope fixation group or a tight rope fixation with an anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) repair augmentation with an internal brace group. Postoperative reduction was assessed by 3D volumetric ratios and measured by weight-bearing CT at 6-weeks and 3-months post-operation. Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) were collected preoperatively, and at 6-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, and 1-year post-operation and included the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score and the 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (RAND-36) . Differences in volumetric ratios and PROs were evaluated between groups and time periods.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

23

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States, 23456
        • Atlantic Orthopaedic Specialists

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients who fit the study injury list

Exclusion Criteria:

  • smokers
  • prior surgery on ankle
  • bi-lateral surgery
  • recent participation in another study within the last 90days

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Tight Rope Fixation
a traditional tight rope fixation is performed on one randomized set of subjects
Active Comparator: tight rope fixation w/ AITFL repair augmentation with an internal brace
A tight rope fixation with an anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) repair augmentation with an internal brace set of subjects to compare syndesmotic volume

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Syndesmotic Volumetric Ratio
Time Frame: 6-Weeks Post-op
use of weight-bearing CT scan to measure; In order to compare the 3D syndesmotic volume between groups, the volume ratio was calculated for each patient by dividing the syndesmotic volume of the operative ankle by the syndesmotic volume of the contralateral uninjured ankle
6-Weeks Post-op
Syndesmotic Volumetric Ratio
Time Frame: 3 months post-operative volume
use of weight-bearing CT scan to measure; In order to compare the 3D syndesmotic volume between groups, the volume ratio was calculated for each patient by dividing the syndesmotic volume of the operative ankle by the syndesmotic volume of the contralateral uninjured ankle
3 months post-operative volume

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (RAND-36) Summary Scores
Time Frame: 6 weeks post-operative
The RAND-36 is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of 36 questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. Scores are 00-100. Higher scores equate to better quality of life and inverse for lower scores. The Physical Health Component and Mental Health Component summary scores were calculated using the oblique method to reduce the risk of underrepresenting mental health scores.
6 weeks post-operative
RAND-36 Summary Scores
Time Frame: 3 months post-operative
The Short Form-36 (SF-36 or RAND-36) is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of 36 questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. Scores are 00-100. Higher scores equate to better quality of life and inverse for lower scores. The Physical Health Component and Mental Health Component summary scores were calculated using the oblique method to reduce the risk of underrepresenting mental health scores.
3 months post-operative
RAND-36 Summary Scores
Time Frame: 6 months post-operative
The SF-36 is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of 36 questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. Scores are 00-100. Higher scores equate to better quality of life and inverse for lower scores. The Physical Health Component and Mental Health Component summary scores were calculated using the oblique method to reduce the risk of underrepresenting mental health scores.
6 months post-operative
RAND-36 Summary Scores
Time Frame: 1 year post-operative
The SF-36 is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of 36 questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. Scores are 00-100. Higher scores equate to better quality of life and inverse for lower scores. The Physical Health Component and Mental Health Component summary scores were calculated using the oblique method to reduce the risk of underrepresenting mental health scores.
1 year post-operative
Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)
Time Frame: 6 weeks post-operative
FAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport(Rec), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL). The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questionnaire. Standardized answer options are given (% Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
6 weeks post-operative
Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)
Time Frame: 3 months post-operative
FAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport(Rec), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL). The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questionnaire. Standardized answer options are given (% Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
3 months post-operative
Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)
Time Frame: 6 months post-operative
FAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport(Rec), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL). The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questionnaire. Standardized answer options are given (% Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
6 months post-operative
Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)
Time Frame: 1 year post-operative
FAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport(Rec), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL). The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questionnaire. Standardized answer options are given (% Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
1 year post-operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Blake E Moore, MD, Vann Virginia Center for Orthopaedics dba Atlantic Orthopaedic Specialists
  • Study Chair: Ashley Suttmiller, PhD, Clinical Researcher
  • Study Director: Brice A Snyder, MSAT, Director of Clinical Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 31, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AOS-0001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ligament Rupture

Clinical Trials on Tight rope fixation

Subscribe