Effects of Microplegia on Transfusion Rates After Cardiac Surgery

September 13, 2022 updated by: Washington University School of Medicine

Effects of Microplegia on Transfusion Rates After Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Prospective Analysis

This is a prospective, randomized study that is studying the rate of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion rates after planned heart (cardiac) surgery. The study will be conducted at Barnes-Jewish Hospital.

Cardioplegia refers to the method of stopping (arresting) the heart in order to perform heart surgery. However, cardioplegia has also come to refer to the solution to achieve cardiac arrest as well as the machinery in which to deliver the solution. This study will investigate our current Standard Cardioplegia (diluted 4:1 blood cardioplegia) versus Microplegia (undiluted blood cardioplegia) to determine if Microplegia reduces peri-operative blood transfusion rates as compared to Standard Cardioplegia. All forms of cardioplegia will be delivered using the MPS2 Microplegia delivery machine by Quest Medical, Inc.

Patients will be randomized to receive undiluted microplegia or standard 4:1 cardioplegia. The patient and the surgeon will be blinded to the randomization.

Patients will be followed for 30 days post-operatively (or until their initial standard of care post-operative follow up visit with cardiac surgery if that appointment falls outside of the 30 day post-operative window) for the development of any adverse events as well as documentation of blood products given.

We will draw one tube of blood for troponin levels at four time points; 1 draw before surgery (this may be done during the intraoperative period), and 3 draws post-operatively: ICU arrival, 12 hours post-ICU arrival and 24 hours post-ICU arrival. This is to closely monitor the patient for any heart tissue injury.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cardioplegia was first introduced as a method to protect the heart during cardiac surgery in the 1950s (1). Initially, it consisted of a crystalloid solution and in the 1970s Follette and colleagues proposed that blood was the best mode of delivery of cardioplegia as it is rich in nutrients and oxygen (2). Blood has better osmotic, buffering, and antioxidant qualities that are needed by ischemic myocardium. More recent studies comparing blood and crystalloid cardioplegias showed that there was less cardiac edema, and recovery of ventricular function was more rapid with blood based cardioplegia (3). A meta-analysis of over 5000 patients corroborated these findings and showed that blood based cardioplegia reduced the incidence of postoperative low cardiac output syndrome and was associated with less myocardial damage (4).

Standard diluted blood cardioplegia can also be modified to undiluted blood cardioplegia also known as microplegia. To compare the cardioprotection of 4:1 blood:crystalloid cardioplegia to microplegia, McCann et al randomized 20 pigs to either group. Cardiac edema was measured using histologic morphometrics and echocardiogram. It was noted that both edema percentage and left ventricular mass were significantly more decreased in the microplegia group. Furthermore, all animals receiving microplegia were successfully weaned off cardiopulmonary bypass, whereas only 40% of those receiving standard cardioplegia were successfully weaned (5).

More recently, Algarni et al. showed decreased prevalence of low cardiac output syndrome in patients who received microplegia (n=2,630) (6). Another study compared microplegia and standard cardioplegia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and found that the microplegia group had lower troponin levels during the post-operative course. Moreover, microplegia resulted in lower transfusion rates and decreased length of hospital stay (7).

A high rate of patients undergoing cardiac surgery require red blood cell transfusions (RBC). Red blood cell transfusions are strongly associated with both infection and ischemic postoperative morbidity, length of stay, increased early and late mortality, and overall hospital costs (8). Given that previous studies have shown that microplegia is associated with less transfusions, it would be reasonable to incorporate this into practice at Washington University.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

314

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Recruiting
        • Washington University School of Medicine
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Spencer Melby, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Are to undergo non-emergent cardiac surgery
  • >18 years of age
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of endocarditis
  • Dialysis-dependent renal failure
  • Currently on pre-operative mechanical circulatory support (i.e. ECMO, LVAD or intra-aortic balloon pump [IABP])
  • Contraindication to receiving a blood transfusion (i.e. Jehovah's Witness)
  • Emergency procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cardioplegia
4:1 cardioplegia consists of 4 parts crystalloid intravenous fluid to one part human blood.

The microplegia solution that is standard of care for all cardiac surgery patients, and which all study subjects will receive is:

Induction 240 mL Baxter Cardioplegia Solution 10. 5 mL Potassium Chloride 2 meq/ml (21 meq) 250.5 mL total volume

Maintenance 747 mL Baxter Cardioplegia Solution 3.4 mL Potassium Chloride 2 meq/ml (6.75 meq) 750.4 mL total volume

Subjects will be randomly assigned to 4:1 cardioplegia or nondiluted microplegia.

4:1 cardioplegia consists of 4 parts crystalloid intravenous fluid to one part human blood.

Nondiluted microplegia consists of all parts human blood.

Active Comparator: Microplegia
Nondiluted microplegia consists of all parts human blood.

The microplegia solution that is standard of care for all cardiac surgery patients, and which all study subjects will receive is:

Induction 240 mL Baxter Cardioplegia Solution 10. 5 mL Potassium Chloride 2 meq/ml (21 meq) 250.5 mL total volume

Maintenance 747 mL Baxter Cardioplegia Solution 3.4 mL Potassium Chloride 2 meq/ml (6.75 meq) 750.4 mL total volume

Subjects will be randomly assigned to 4:1 cardioplegia or nondiluted microplegia.

4:1 cardioplegia consists of 4 parts crystalloid intravenous fluid to one part human blood.

Nondiluted microplegia consists of all parts human blood.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Microplegia results in less peri-operative transfusions
Time Frame: 30 days
To determine if use of microplegia results in less peri-operative transfusions compared to diluted 4:1 cardioplegia.
30 days
Effects of Microplegia on overall morbidity and mortality during peri-operative period
Time Frame: 30 days
To investigate the effects of microplegia on overall morbidity and mortality during the peri-operative period. We will assess operative mortality and 30 day mortality. We will examine intra-operative and post-operative complications. A complete list of variables to be examined can be found in table 1. We will determine if microplegia results in better myocardial protection than standard cardioplegia by assessing pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative serum troponin levels.
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Spencer J Melby, MD, Washington University School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 25, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 13, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Valve Disease

Clinical Trials on Cardioplegia Solution

3
Subscribe