Verapamil in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

January 5, 2022 updated by: Mohamed Hosny Sayed, Assiut University

Effect of Verapamil as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Guided by Ultrasound for Forearm and Hand Surgeries

Supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SCBPB) is the common approach to provide surgical anesthesia of upper limb. The effects of single-injection brachial plexus nerve blocks recede after several hours unmasking the moderate to- severe pain of the surgical insult.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Strategies to prolong brachial plexus nerve blocks analgesia beyond the pharmacological duration of the local anaesthetic used include placement of indwelling perineural catheters to allow prolonged infusion or the co-administration of adjuvants such as epinephrine, a2 agonists (i.e. clonidine and dexmedetomidine), midazolam, or the corticosteroid dexamethasone.

The investigators will use calcium channel blocker as adjuvant to bupivacaine in supraclavicular block. Calcium plays an important role in analgesia produced by local anesthetics. The activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors may lead to calcium entry into cells and potentiation of spinal cord and plays a role in pain formation. Hence, calcium channel blockers may prevent central sensitization and provide better sensory motor block characteristics. Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker can potentiate analgesic action of local anesthetics and reduce postoperative pain and analgesic consumption. Few studies were there using 2.5 mg of verapamil, showing no effect on onset and duration of sensory motor block. Hence, the investigators have used 5 mg of verapamil as adjuvant to bupivacaine. The primary aim of the study was to know whether verapamil (5 mg) as adjuvant to bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block would delay the need of rescue analgesia.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA I-II patients older than 18years and scheduled for forearm and hand surgeries like :

    1. fracture radius and ulna.
    2. cut wrists.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. allergy to the study drugs,
  2. skin infection at site of needle puncture,
  3. significant organ dysfunction, coagulopathy, drug or alcohol abuse, epilepsy, and psychiatric illness that would interfere with perception and assessment of pain.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Group (A) : 30 patients (control group):
Patient will receive 20 to 30 ml bupivacaine plus 2 ml of normal saline .
laboratory test
laboratory test
laboratory test
Experimental: Group (B) : 30 patients (verapamil group):
Patient will receive 20 to 30 ml bupivacaine plus 5 mg of verapamil diluted in 2 ml of normal saline.
laboratory test
laboratory test
laboratory test
drug will be add to prolong the effect of regional block
Other Names:
  • Isoptin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
duration of postoperative analgesia.
Time Frame: in first 24 hours
blinded observer will collect the Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain scored from Zero to ten where 0= no pain and 10 = the worst pain imaginable for acute post-operative pain.
in first 24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Regional Anesthesia Morbidity

Clinical Trials on complete blood count

3
Subscribe