A Global Clinical Study Investigating the Safety and Effectiveness of Smith and Nephew's Porous Knee System in Patients Who Need a Total Knee Replacement Due to Degenerative Arthritis, Post-traumatic Arthritis or Inflammatory Arthritis

March 15, 2024 updated by: Smith & Nephew, Inc.

A Multi-Centre Study in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Replacement With Smith+Nephew Porous Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) System

A clinical trial investigating the safety and effectiveness of Smith and Nephew's FDA-approved Porous Total Knee System, which is used to replace worn away and diseased knee joints. The aim of this study is to show that most patients who receive the Porous Total Knee System have reduced pain, greater mobility and a long-lasting implant post-surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patients who need a total knee replacement or have recently had a total knee replacement with the Smith and Nephew Porous Total Knee System will be enrolled into the study. Before surgery X-rays will be collected and questionnaires will be administered which ask the patient about knee pain, activities of daily living, quality of life and how they feel about their knee. The same X-rays and questionnaires will be asked before surgery and then after surgery at various intervals up to 10 years post-surgery.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
        • St George and Sutherland Centre for Clinical Orthopaedic Research
    • Victoria
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3121
        • OrthoSport Victoria
      • Robina, Victoria, Australia, 3121
        • Robina Hospital
      • Windsor, Victoria, Australia, 3181
        • The Avenue Hospital
    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R2K2M9
        • Concordia Joint Replacement Group
      • Leeuwarden, Netherlands, 8934
        • Medical Center Leeuwarden
    • Ubbergen,
      • Ubbergen, Ubbergen,, Netherlands, 6574
        • Sint Maartenskliniek
      • Umeå, Sweden, 90737
        • Umeå University Hospital
    • Connecticut
      • Brookfield, Connecticut, United States, 06804
        • Orthopaedic Specialists of Connecticut
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30084
        • Emory Orthopaedics and Spine Hospital
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40506
        • University of Kentucky
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
    • Michigan
      • Novi, Michigan, United States, 48374
        • The Core Institute
    • New York
      • East Syracuse, New York, United States, 13057
        • Syracuse Orthopedic Specialists
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • NYU Langone Health Orthopedic Hospital
    • North Carolina
      • Morrisville, North Carolina, United States, 27560
        • Duke Health
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Oregon Health & Science University
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina
    • Tennessee
      • Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States, 37403
        • Erlanger Health
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77401
        • UTHealth
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 52718
        • University Of Wisconsin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient population will be selected by investigators from their clinics. Patients who report pain/mobility issues and who have been recommended for total knee replacement with Porous Total Knee System by their surgeon.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. A) Subject needing primary TKA due to degenerative joint disease (primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis), post-traumatic arthritis or inflammatory arthritis.

    OR

    B) Subject has undergone primary TKA with Smith+Nephew Porous knee system in past 12 months to repair degenerative joint disease, post- traumatic arthritis or inflammatory arthritis and all the following conditions have been met:

    • Preoperative KOOS JR and radiographs have been obtained
    • 6-Month KOOS JR and radiographs have been obtained or these can be collected prospectively in window per schedule of events
    • 12-Month KOOS JR and radiographs have been obtained or these can be collected prospectively in window per schedule of events
  2. Subject agrees to consent and to follow the prospective study visit schedule (as defined in the study protocol and informed consent form) by signing the Independent Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) approved informed consent form.
  3. Subject is willing to attend study follow-up visits for up to ten (10) years post-surgery.
  4. Subject is able to read, understand, and communicate responses to Patient Reported Outcome assessments.
  5. Subject is 18-80 years old (inclusive).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject received TKA on the contralateral knee as a revision for a previously failed total or unicondylar knee arthroplasty.
  2. Subject has a Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 40 at time of surgery.
  3. Subject has ipsilateral hip arthritis resulting in flexion contracture.
  4. At the time of enrolment, subject has one or more of the following arthroplasties that are not fully healed and well-functioning, as determined by the investigator: Ipsilateral or contralateral primary total hip arthroplasty or hip resurfacing arthroplasty; Contralateral primary total knee or unicondylar knee arthroplasty.
  5. Subject has a condition that may interfere with the TKA survival or outcome (e.g. Paget's or Charcot's disease, vascular insufficiency, lupus, muscular atrophy, uncontrolled diabetes, moderate to severe renal insufficiency or neuromuscular disease).
  6. Subject has a known allergy to one or more of its components of the study device.
  7. Any subject with hardware present in distal femur or proximal tibia.
  8. Any subject that meets the definition of a Vulnerable Subject per ISO 14155 Section 3.55.
  9. Subject is entered in another drug, biologic, or device study or has been treated with an investigational product in the past 30 days.
  10. Subject, in the opinion of the Investigator, has an emotional or neurological condition that would pre-empt their ability or willingness to participate in the study including mental illness, drug or alcohol abuse.
  11. Subject is known to be at risk for lost to follow-up, or failure to return for scheduled visits.
  12. Women who are pregnant, nursing, or of child-bearing potential who are not utilizing highly effective birth control measures.
  13. Subjects who have participated previously in this clinical trial and who have been withdrawn.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
LEGION Porous CR with Hydroxyapatite
Patients who have already received or a due to receive a Porous Tibia + LEGION Porous CR with HA femoral component (max 175 subjects)
A surgical procedure to replace both the tibial and femoral articular surfaces with titanium prostheses.
Other Names:
  • Total Knee Replacement
LEGION Porous CR without Hydroxyapatite
Patients who have already received or a due to receive a Porous Tibia + LEGION Porous CR without HA femoral component (max 175 subjects)
A surgical procedure to replace both the tibial and femoral articular surfaces with titanium prostheses.
Other Names:
  • Total Knee Replacement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implant Survivorship 2 Years Post-Surgery
Time Frame: 2 years post-surgery
Implant survivorship is defined as the cumulative proportion of knee implanted components without a revision.
2 years post-surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Reported Outcomes - Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR)
Time Frame: Pre-op, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, and 10 years
KOOS JR assesses patient stiffness (1 item), pain (4 items), and functions of daily living (2 items). Scores range from 0 to 100 with a score of 0 indicating total knee disability and 100 indicating perfect knee health.
Pre-op, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, and 10 years
Patient Reported Outcomes - Oxford Knee Score (OKS)
Time Frame: Pre-op, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, and 10 years
The OKS contains 12 equally weighted questions on activities of daily living. Responses to each question range from 0-4 with a range of a possible overall score from 0-48. A score of 0 is the worst possible outcome while a score of 48 is the best possible outcome.
Pre-op, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, and 10 years
Patient Reported Outcomes - Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)
Time Frame: Pre-op, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, and 10 years
The FJS questionnaire focuses on the study participant's awareness of a specific joint in everyday life. Joint awareness can be simply defined as any unintended perception of a joint. The FJS for an individual participant is rated on a scale of 1-100 where 100 is the best/max score.
Pre-op, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, and 10 years
Radiographic Assessment - Implant Position
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 6 months
Implant position will be assessed by the femoral flexion angle, tibial angle, and posterior tibial slope angle from AP and lateral radiographs.
6 weeks and 6 months
Radiographic Assessment - Implant Migration
Time Frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, and 10 years

Migration will be assessed in accordance with the following definitions:

  • 0. Absent: Absence of progressive radiolucency OR absence of movement of the implant.
  • 1. Present: Presence of progressive radiolucency AND presence of movement of the implant.
1 year, 2 years, 5 years, and 10 years
Radiographic Assessment - Progressive Radiolucency
Time Frame: 1 year, 2 Years, 5 years, and 10 years

Progressive Radiolucency will be assessed in accordance with the following definitions:

  • 0. Absent: No evidence of progressive radiolucency at the bone-cement interface relative to the last measured Radiolucent Line time point.
  • 1. Present: Presence of an increase >1 mm of the Radiolucent Line (Bone-Cement) width and/or new involvement of additional component zones relative to the last measured Radiolucent Line time point.
1 year, 2 Years, 5 years, and 10 years
Radiographic Assessment - Implant Loosening
Time Frame: 6 months, 1 year, 2 Years, 5 years, and 10 years

Both aseptic and septic component loosening will be evaluated to assess loss of implant fixation with the following definitions:

  • 0. Absent: No evidence of specific imaging features of loosening in the joint space.
  • 1. Present: Presence of apparent imaging features of loosening in the joint space.
6 months, 1 year, 2 Years, 5 years, and 10 years
Post-Operation Device Related Re-Interventions Related to Operative Knee
Time Frame: Post-op through study completion, approximately 10 years
Count of device-related re-interventions that occur related to the operative knee post-operation.
Post-op through study completion, approximately 10 years
Implant Survival Rate Up to 10 Years Post-Operation
Time Frame: 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years
Survival rate determined by proportion of participants that required no implant revisions.
1 year, 5 years, and 10 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Amir Kamali, Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 21, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 10, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 10, 2034

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Total Knee Arthroplasty

3
Subscribe