Implementation and Evaluation of Neck-specific Exercises

Evaluation of Implementation and Effectiveness of Neck-specific Exercise for Persistent Disability and Pain After Whiplash Injury; a Randomized Controlled Study Using a Hybrid II Design

Persistent pain and disability in whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) grade II and III are common. Randomized controlled studies (RCTs) have shown promising result for neck-specific exercise (NSE) programmes in chronic WAD with clinically and statistically significant improvement in pain and disability. Neck-specific exercise with internet support (NSEIT) and four visits to a physiotherapist was non-inferior to NSE at a physiotherapist clinic 2 times a week in 12 weeks (24 visits). The aims of the proposed study are to evaluate an implementation strategy for NSE and NSEIT in primary health care and to evaluate the effectiveness of NSE and NSEIT in clinical practice.

Study Overview

• Status: Recruiting
• Conditions: Neck Pain; Whiplash Injuries; Neck Disorder
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Implementation strategy - experimental group; Other: Implementation - control group

Detailed Description

The study is a prospective cluster-randomized study with hybrid II trial design.

In total will 20 physiotherapy clinics in primary health care be recruited. Reg. physiotherapists working in the twenty physiotherapy clinics will be included. The clinics will be randomised to two groups with different implementation strategy: (A, intervention) three theoretical on-line lectures and the three hours' practical training with additional support; (B, control) the same education and practical training as A but with no additional support. Twenty-five patients with neck pain will be consecutively recruited from each clinic, a total of 500 patients. Outcome measurements will be conducted at baseline, 3- and 12-months.

This trial will evaluate the implementation strategy in terms of adoption of and adherence to NSEIT and NSE in clinical primary health care, also measuring diffusion of the method to other neck pain patients. In parallel, effectiveness of the exercises are evaluated.

All analyses will be conducted in collaboration with a statistician using parametric or non-parametric statistics depending on the type of data.

1. The implementation strategy will be analyzed using parametric t-test and a linear mixed model Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) or non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis to evaluate differences between group A and B and change in variables over time.

   To further evaluate the implementation strategy will two focus group studies be conducted, with a purposeful sample of physiotherapists included in the cluster-randomized mixed-design study. The overall aim of these qualitative studies is to deepen the knowledge on the uptake of the new method, i.e., the NSEIT/NSE programme (adoption), the implementation in clinical practice (implementation), and how it continues to be used (maintenance).

2. The effectiveness of NSEIT and NSE will be analysed with a linear mixed model Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) or Kruskal-Wallis depending on the data.

The effect of neck-specific exercises in the present study will also be evaluated and compared to the results in our former RCT-studies.

Sample size and power regarding group differences were calculated by a statistician. Sample size calculation was based on the assumption that 15% more patients will receive neck-specific exercises in the intervention group (40% in the intervention group and 25% in the control group). The required sample size under individual randomization will be 150 patients in each arm. With ten physiotherapy clinics (clusters) in each arm (a total of 20 clusters), intra-cluster correlation of 0.02 and a cluster size of 21 patients, a total of 420 patients are recruited for 80% power and a significance level of 0.05. To ensure that enough people are in each group after dropouts, a total of 500 patients will be included, 25 patients from each cluster. The patients will be consecutively recruited.

Patients who are included in both the intervention and control groups and received neck-specific exercises will be treated as one group in terms of the effect of the intervention. The sample size calculation to evaluate effectiveness was based on a clinically relevant improvement of 7% on the Neck Disability Index (NDI), effect size 0.2 (Cohen's f) or 0.4 (Cohen's d), and correlation among repeated measures of 0.3, resulting in a total of 56 participants for 80% power and a significance level of 0.05. With an expected dropout rate of 20%, a total of 70 participating patients are needed.

The patients will be analysed as one group and the total number of patients may be more than 70 because patients will be included at each clinic. All analyses will be conducted in collaboration with a statistician using parametric or non-parametric statistics depending on the type of data. Data will be analysed according to intention to treat and supplemented with per protocol analysis.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Anticipated): 20
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Sweden
  • Uppsala, Sweden
    • Recruiting
    • Gunnel Peterson
  • Örebro, Sweden
    • Recruiting
    • Emma Nilsing-Strid
  • Dalarna
    • Leksand, Dalarna, Sweden, SE-581 83
      • Recruiting
      • Gunnel Peterson
  • Gävleborg
    • Ljusdal, Gävleborg, Sweden
      • Recruiting
      • Gunnel Peterson
  • Skåne
    • Helsingborg, Skåne, Sweden
      • Recruiting
      • Gunnel Peterson
  • Sörmland
    • Nyköping, Sörmland, Sweden
      • Recruiting
      • Gunnel Peterson
  • Västmanland
    • Västerås, Västmanland, Sweden, SE-581 83
      • Recruiting
      • Sofia Ask

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion criteria implementation

- Reg. physiotherapists working in twenty physiotherapy clinics in primary health care.

Exclusion criteria implementation

- No exclusion criterta

Inclusion criteria to evaluate the effectiveness of neck-specific exercise

• The physiotherapists will include patients ≥ 18 years with neck pain.
• Patients are required to have internet access by phone, tablet, or computer
• Be able to read and understand Swedish

Exclusion criteria:

• Physiotherapists should exclude patients with "red flags"i.e., symptoms that suggest a serious illness or spinal abnormality.
• Serious trauma to the neck and no X-ray
• Preceding neck surgery
• Osteoporosis
• Myelopathy
• History of cancer
• Unexplained weight loss
• Present fever, history of infections
• Constant and progressive non-mechanical pain
• Insidious progression of pain
• Signs of spinal cord compression (neurological examination to exclude spinal cord or cervical myelopathy such as clumsy hands, altered gait, or disturbances of sexual, bladder or sphincter function).

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Other
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Implementation study - experimental group; Physiotherapists in the experimental group (group A) will receive on-line theoretical education including three hours of practical training by the project leaders. The standardized theoretical education includes three 45 minutes on-line lectures. The theoretical education will be followed by three hours practical training including clinical examination in patients with neck disability and instructions how to perform the neck-specific exercises.To facilitate the implementation process, group A will receive additional support; the physiotherapists can contact the project leader via e-mail, phone, online meetings and/or outreach visits	Other: Implementation strategy - experimental group; On-line theoretical education and three hours of practical training by the project leaders. Contact with the project team via e-mail, phone and on-line repetition of the education for remaining of the clinical examination, neck-specific program and the progression of exercises.
Active Comparator: Implementation study - control group; Physiotherapists in the control group (group B) will receive the same theoretical and practical training as group A but without additional support from the research group or education after the first three theoretical on-line lectures and the three hours practical education.	Other: Implementation - control group; Physiotherapists in the control group will receive the same theoretical and practical training as the experimental group but without repetition of the education or support from the research team.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Implementation - Adoption of neck-specific exercise programmes	Proportion of patients with neck pain receiving neck-specific exercise	Baseline to 3 and 12 months (proportions of 500 patients with neck pain from 20 physiotherapy clinics)
Patient Effectiveness - Neck Disability Index	Self-reported neck-specific function	Change from baseline to 3 months (after treatment) and 12 months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Implementation - The Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS)	Physiotherapists attitudes to implementation of evidence-based practice	Baseline
Implementation - Practitioner Confidence Scale (PCS)	Self-efficacy and confidence to diagnose and treat patients with neck pain	Change from baseline to 3 months (after treatment) and 12 months follow-up
Patient - Pain intensity (current, average last week, worst pain last week) in neck, head, and arm, and dizziness (current, average last week, worst dizziness last week)	Numeric Rating Scale (NRS); 0=no pain or dizziness, 10=worst imaginable pain or dizziness).	Change from baseline to 3 months (after treatment) and 12 months follow-up
Patient - rating of self-perceived health	How is your current health in general? Numeric Rating Scale 0-10, 0=the worst health; 10= "the best health you can imagine	Change from baseline to 3 months (after treatment) and 12 months follow-up
Patient - Workability	Self-reported workability measured with the Work Ability Score (WAS). The worker's self-assessment of his/her current ability to work compared to the lifetime best.WAS; (0 = currently can not work at all, 10=work ability at it's best	Change from baseline to 3 months (after treatment) and 12 months follow-up
Patient - The patient's assessment of perceived anxiety and depression	During the last week, have you felt anxious or depressed? Numeric Rating Scale (0-10), 0=no, not at all; 10= yes, very much	Change from baseline to 3 months (after treatment) and 12 months follow-up
Patient - Improvement or deterioration over time	Global Rating scale (GRS) (-5=vastly worse, 0=unchanged, 5=completely recovered)	Measured at 3 months and 15 months follow up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Background data	Background data from physiotherapists and patients such as age and gender	Baseline
Implementation Qualitative data	Two focus group studies with a purposeful sample of physiotherapists	After 2 and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Sormland County Council, Sweden
• Collaborators: Linkoeping University

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Zhao L, Zhao X, Tian P, Liang L, Huang B, Huang L, Feng J, Zhang Y, Zhang J. Prognostic utility of the prognostic nutritional index combined with serum sodium level in patients with heart failure. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2022 Aug;32(8):1894-1902. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2022.04.004. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
• Liang L, Zhao X, Huang L, Tian P, Huang B, Feng J, Zhou P, Wang J, Zhang J, Zhang Y. Prevalence and prognostic importance of malnutrition, as assessed by four different scoring systems, in elder patients with heart failure. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2023 Jan 11:S0939-4753(23)00009-1. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2023.01.004. Online ahead of print.
• Zhao L, Zhao X, Tian P, Liang L, Huang B, Huang L, Feng J, Zhang Y, Zhang J. Predictive value of remnant cholesterol level for all-cause mortality in heart failure patients. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Feb 15;10:1063562. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1063562. eCollection 2023.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): March 18, 2022
• Primary Completion (Anticipated): August 30, 2023
• Study Completion (Anticipated): June 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: January 4, 2022
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 5, 2022
• First Posted (Actual): January 20, 2022

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): April 13, 2023
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 12, 2023
• Last Verified: April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Rehabilitation; Exercise; Randomized Controlled Trial; Internet; Neck pain; Implementation Science; Whiplash-associated disorders
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pain; Neurologic Manifestations; Wounds and Injuries; Neck Injuries; Neck Pain; Whiplash Injuries
• Other Study ID Numbers: SormlandCCGP

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No