mHealth-supported Coach

August 18, 2023 updated by: Dr. Helen YL Chan, Food and Health Bureau, Hong Kong

A Multidisciplinary-led Personalised mHealth-supported Coach for Reducing Midlife Stroke Risk

A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effects of a personalised mHealth-supported coach programme in the middle-aged group with stroke risk.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Aim: To evaluate the effects of a personalised mHealth-supported coach programme on the adoption of health-promoting behaviours in the middle-aged group, in comparison with usual care.

Design: A 24-month prospective two-arm, parallel-group, single-blinded, repeated-measure randomised controlled trial will be conducted.

Participants: People who aged between 40 and 64, mentally competent, have a non-laboratory INTERHEART risk score (IHRS) of 10 or higher, communicable in Chinese and free from stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) or other cardiovascular disease will be eligible to the study. A total of 164 participants will be recruited through a district community centre and randomly assigned on 1:1 ratio to the intervention group or the control group.

Intervention: A theory-based mHealth-supported coach programme, including individual consultation sessions and a mobile application with a virtual sharing platform, is developed by a multidisciplinary team for the intervention group over three months, whereas the control group receives usual care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

164

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 00000
        • Recruiting
        • The Chinese University of Hong Kong
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chinese ethnic
  • able to read Chinese and communicate in Cantonese/Mandarin
  • with non-laboratory IHRS score 10 or higher

Exclusion Criteria:

  • mentally incompetent
  • previously diagnosed with stroke, TIA, MI, coronary heart disease, heart failure or atrial fibrillation
  • with eye or retinal disease
  • with terminal disease with an expected life expectancy less than six months
  • being pregnant
  • have enrolled in other lifestyle-based or exercise-based projects
  • do have mobile devices or internet service to access the mobile application

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Personalised mHeatlh-supported coaching programme
Three monthly individual consultation session, supported with a specific mobile application.
The intervention includes two components. Three individual consultation sessions based on a health coaching protocol developed by a multidisciplinary team. A mobile application provides educational information about healthy lifestyles, knowledge quizzes, telemonitoring function and virtual platform for sharing.
Active Comparator: Traditional in-person health coaching programme
Three monthly individual consultation sessions.
Three individual consultation sessions delivered by a nurse.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health-promoting behaviours
Time Frame: 3-month post-allocation
Four subscales, including health responsibility, nutrition, physical activity and stress management, of the Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II. The possible score range from 34 to 136, with a higher score meaning healthier lifestyles were adopted.
3-month post-allocation
Health-promoting behaviours
Time Frame: 6-month post-allocation
Four subscales, including health responsibility, nutrition, physical activity and stress management, of the Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II. The possible score range from 34 to 136, with a higher score meaning healthier lifestyles were adopted.
6-month post-allocation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-efficacy of adopting health-promoting behaviours
Time Frame: 3-month post-allocation
The adapted version of the Diabetes Mellitus Type II Self Efficacy Scale will be used. Participants will rate their level of confidence in various behaviours, in diet control, weight control and lifestyle management, by using a five-point Likert scale. The possible scores ranged from 7 to 35, with a higher score meaning a higher level of self-efficacy.
3-month post-allocation
Self-efficacy
Time Frame: 6-month post-allocation
The adapted version of the Diabetes Mellitus Type II Self Efficacy Scale will be used. Participants will rate their level of confidence in various behaviours, in diet control, weight control and lifestyle management, by using a five-point Likert scale. The possible scores ranged from 7 to 35, with a higher score meaning a higher level of self-efficacy.
6-month post-allocation
INTERHEART risk score
Time Frame: 3-month post-allocation
The score was calculated based on the weighted sum of nine risk factors, including age, sex, lifestyles and psychosocial wellbeing, which were significantly related to cardiovasuclar diseases. The possible score range was 0 - 48, in which a higher score corresponds to higher risk.
3-month post-allocation
INTERHEART risk score
Time Frame: 6-month post-allocation
The score was calculated based on the weighted sum of nine risk factors, including age, sex, lifestyles and psychosocial wellbeing, which were significantly related to cardiovasuclar diseases. The possible score range was 0 - 48, in which a higher score corresponds to higher risk.
6-month post-allocation
automatic retinal image analysis
Time Frame: 3-month post-allocation
Retinal fundus image will be obtained from both eyes of the participant using a non-mydriatic digital retinal camera (Canon CR-2 AF, U.S.A., Inc). Stroke risk estimation will be determined through fractural analysis, statistical texture analysis and high-order spectra analysis based on the retinal vessel parameters. The ARIA-stroke algorithm developed using R and Matlab software has a sensitivity and a specificity of 94.7% and 100%, respectively. The value between 0.5 and 0.7 is considered as moderate risk, while high risk is considered at 0.7 or higher.
3-month post-allocation
automatic retinal image analysis (ARIA)
Time Frame: 6-month post-allocation
Retinal fundus image will be obtained from both eyes of the participant using a non-mydriatic digital retinal camera (Canon CR-2 AF, U.S.A., Inc). Stroke risk estimation will be determined through fractural analysis, statistical texture analysis and high-order spectra analysis based on the retinal vessel parameters. The ARIA-stroke algorithm developed using R and Matlab software has a sensitivity and a specificity of 94.7% and 100%, respectively. The value between 0.5 and 0.7 is considered as moderate risk, while high risk is considered at 0.7 or higher.
6-month post-allocation
Psychological distress
Time Frame: 3-month post-allocation
The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21)includes 21 items, with 7 in each subscale: depression, anxiety and stress. Participants will rate their level of agreement with the statements on a 4-point Likert scale, from 0 (not apply to me at all) to 3 (applied to me very much). The potential scores range from 0 to 63, with a higher score means higher level of distress experienced.
3-month post-allocation
Psychological distress
Time Frame: 6-month post-allocation
The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21)includes 21 items, with 7 in each subscale: depression, anxiety and stress. Participants will rate their level of agreement with the statements on a 4-point Likert scale, from 0 (not apply to me at all) to 3 (applied to me very much). The potential scores range from 0 to 63, with a higher score means higher level of distress experienced.
6-month post-allocation
Change in Blood pressure
Time Frame: Between baseline and 3-month post-allocation
Blood pressure measurement will be carried out, after 10 min of rest, on the left arm in a sitting posture by using an electronic sphygmomanometer.
Between baseline and 3-month post-allocation
Change in Blood pressure
Time Frame: Between 3-month and 6-month post-allocation
Blood pressure measurement will be carried out, after 10 min of rest, on the left arm in a sitting posture by using an electronic sphygmomanometer.
Between 3-month and 6-month post-allocation
Change in Body mass index (BMI)
Time Frame: Between baseline and 3-month post-allocation
BMI will be calculated by dividing the weight (in kilogram) by the height (in meter) squared. The height will be measured using a stadiometer, and body weight will be measured using an electronic scale.
Between baseline and 3-month post-allocation
Change in Body mass index(BMI)
Time Frame: Between 3-month and 6-month post-allocation
BMI will be calculated by dividing the weight (in kilogram) by the height (in meter) squared. The height will be measured using a stadiometer, and body weight will be measured using an electronic scale.
Between 3-month and 6-month post-allocation
Change in Waist-hip ratio (WHR)
Time Frame: Between baseline and 3-month post-allocation
WHR will be used for determining body fat distribution. Waist circumference will be measured at the mid-point between the lowest rib and the iliac crest, whereas hip circumference will be measured at the widest level over the great trochanters. The two measurements will be measured to the nearest 0.1 cm by using a measuring tape.
Between baseline and 3-month post-allocation
Change in Waist-hip ratio (WHR)
Time Frame: Between 3-month and 6-month post-allocation
WHR will be used for determining body fat distribution. Waist circumference will be measured at the mid-point between the lowest rib and the iliac crest, whereas hip circumference will be measured at the widest level over the great trochanters. The two measurements will be measured to the nearest 0.1 cm by using a measuring tape.
Between 3-month and 6-month post-allocation
Change in Fasting blood glucose
Time Frame: Between baseline and 3-month post-allocation
Blood samples will be taken by an experienced nurse and sent to accredited commercial biochemistry laboratories for analysis.
Between baseline and 3-month post-allocation
Change in Fasting blood glucose
Time Frame: Between 3-month and 6-month post-allocation
Blood samples will be taken by an experienced nurse and sent to accredited commercial biochemistry laboratories for analysis.
Between 3-month and 6-month post-allocation
Change in Blood lipid profile
Time Frame: Between baseline and 3-month post-allocation
The profile includes ncluding triglyceride, total Cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Blood samples will be taken by an experienced nurse and sent to accredited commercial biochemistry laboratories for analysis.
Between baseline and 3-month post-allocation
Change in Blood lipid profile
Time Frame: Between 3-month and 6-month post-allocation
The profile includes ncluding triglyceride, total Cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Blood samples will be taken by an experienced nurse and sent to accredited commercial biochemistry laboratories for analysis.
Between 3-month and 6-month post-allocation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Helen Y Chan, Ph.D, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 4, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 05200218

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Disease Risk Factors

Clinical Trials on mHealth-supported coaching

3
Subscribe