Flexible Tip Bougie vs Tube With Stylet for Intubation With a Videolaryngoscopy in ICU (VIDEOL-FLEXTIP) (VIFLEXTIPICU)

July 11, 2023 updated by: Manuel Taboada Muñiz, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago

A Randomized Comparison Between the Flexible Tip Bougie vs Tube With Stylet for First-attempt Intubation Success With a Videolaryngoscopy in ICU Patients

Tracheal intubation in the intensive care unit (ICU) is associated with high incidence of difficult intubation and complications . Videolaryngoscopes (VLs) devices have been proposed to improve airway management, and the use of VLs are recommended as first-line or after a first-attempt failure using direct laryngoscopy in ICU airway management algorithms. Although two meta-analysis showed that videolaryngoscopy improves visualization of the glottis and the first-attempt success, other two meta-analysis reported that videolaryngoscopy didn´t improve first-attempt success rate. The reason may be that although VLs improve glottic visualization, on many occasions it may not be accompanied by intubation at the first attempt, because the endotracheal tube has to pass a sharp angle to enter the trachea. To avoid this limitation, a new flexible tip bougie is designed to flexibly navigate the distal tip and help facilitate precise insertion of the endotracheal tube in the trachea .

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Although VLs improve glottic visualization, on many occasions it may not be accompanied by intubation at the first attempt, because the endotracheal tube has to pass a sharp angle to enter the trachea. To avoid this limitation, a new flexible tip bougie is designed to flexibly navigate the distal tip and help facilitate precise insertion of the endotracheal tube in the trachea. The flexible tip bougie has an integrated slider along the surface which moves the tip anterior and posterior while the pre-curved distal portion of shaft allows the angulation to provide anterior flexion. This new flexible tip bougie could be used as a rescue when first intubation failure using the videolaryngoscopy, or as a first option to improve the percentage of patients intubated at the first attempt.

The purpose of this prospective randomized study is to compare successful intubation on the first attempt wuth the new flexible tip bougie versus endotracheal tube with stylet during intubation with videolaryngoscopy of critically ill adults in ICU.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

140

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Manuel Taboada Muñiz, Ph.D.
  • Phone Number: 0034-981950674
  • Email: manutabo@yahoo.es

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Manuel Taboada Muñiz, Ph.D.
  • Phone Number: 678195618
  • Email: manutabo@yahoo.es

Study Locations

    • A Coruña
      • Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain, 15866
        • Recruiting
        • University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • María Teresa Cabaleiro Ocampo
          • Phone Number: +34 981 951 628

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) and require mechanical ventilation through a tracheal tube.
  • Adult (age ≥ 18 years)
  • Written informed consent from the patient or proxy (if present) before inclusion or once possible when patient has been included in a context of emergency.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal of study participation or to pursue the study by the patient
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Endotracheal Tube with Stylet
Patients randomised to Endotracheal Tube with Stylet will be intubated with a Videolaryngoscopy and with a endotracheal tube + stylet.
Patients randomised to Endotracheal Tube with Stylet will be intubated with a Videolaryngoscopy and with a endotracheal tube + stylet.
Active Comparator: Flexible Tip Bougie
Patients randomised to Flexible Tip Bougie will be intubated with a Videolaryngoscopy and with a Flexible Tip Bougie.
Patients randomised to Flexible Tip Bougie will be intubated with a Videolaryngoscopy and with a Flexible Tip Bougie.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in the first attempt success rate (percentage)
Time Frame: during intubation
To compare the difference in the first attempt success rate (percentage) of different techniques for tracheal intubation.
during intubation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in the overall success rate (percentage)
Time Frame: during intubation
To compare the difference overall success rate (percentage) of different techniques for tracheal intubation.
during intubation
Difference in the incidence of complications related to intubation
Time Frame: Participants will be followed from the beginning of the intervention to 30 minutes after the intervention

To compare the difference in complications (percentage) of different techniques for tracheal intubation:

Hypoxemia (SpO2) < 90 %, Hypoxemia severe (SpO2) < 80 %, Hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure less than 80 mm Hg, Severe hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure less than 65 mm Hg, Cardiac arrest, death during intubation, Moderate or difficult intubation, oesophageal intubation, pulmonary aspiration, dental injuries.

Participants will be followed from the beginning of the intervention to 30 minutes after the intervention
Difficulty of intubation
Time Frame: during intubation
Operator-assessed subjective difficulty of intubation by means of a special analogue numerical scale from 0 to 10, where 0=no subjective difficulty and 10=maximal subjective difficulty
during intubation
Modified Cormack-Lehane grade of glottic view
Time Frame: during intubation

Modified Cormack-Lehane grade of glottic view:

I: full view of the glottis IIa: partial view of the glottis IIb: arytenoid or posterior part of the vocal cords just visible III: only epiglottis visible IV: neither glottis nor epiglottis visible

during intubation
Additional airway equipment
Time Frame: during intubation
Need for additional airway equipment
during intubation
Number of intubation attempts
Time Frame: during intubation
Number of intubation attempts
during intubation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Manuel Taboada Muñiz, Ph.D., University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 17, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 23, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • VIDEOLAR-FLEXTIP-ICU

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data types: Deidentified participant data How to access data: Requests must be sent to manutabo@yahoo.es When available: With publication Additional Information Who can access the data: Researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved T ypes of analyses: For scientific purpose Mechanisms of data availability: With investigator support

IPD Sharing Time Frame

When available: With publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved Types of analyses: For scientific purpose

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intubation; Difficult or Failed

Clinical Trials on Endotracheal Tube with Stylet

3
Subscribe