- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05429112
Flexible Tip Bougie vs Tube With Stylet for Intubation With a Videolaryngoscopy in ICU (VIDEOL-FLEXTIP) (VIFLEXTIPICU)
A Randomized Comparison Between the Flexible Tip Bougie vs Tube With Stylet for First-attempt Intubation Success With a Videolaryngoscopy in ICU Patients
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Although VLs improve glottic visualization, on many occasions it may not be accompanied by intubation at the first attempt, because the endotracheal tube has to pass a sharp angle to enter the trachea. To avoid this limitation, a new flexible tip bougie is designed to flexibly navigate the distal tip and help facilitate precise insertion of the endotracheal tube in the trachea. The flexible tip bougie has an integrated slider along the surface which moves the tip anterior and posterior while the pre-curved distal portion of shaft allows the angulation to provide anterior flexion. This new flexible tip bougie could be used as a rescue when first intubation failure using the videolaryngoscopy, or as a first option to improve the percentage of patients intubated at the first attempt.
The purpose of this prospective randomized study is to compare successful intubation on the first attempt wuth the new flexible tip bougie versus endotracheal tube with stylet during intubation with videolaryngoscopy of critically ill adults in ICU.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Manuel Taboada Muñiz, Ph.D.
- Phone Number: 0034-981950674
- Email: manutabo@yahoo.es
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Manuel Taboada Muñiz, Ph.D.
- Phone Number: 678195618
- Email: manutabo@yahoo.es
Study Locations
-
-
A Coruña
-
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain, 15866
- Recruiting
- University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela
-
Contact:
- Manuel Taboada Muñiz, Ph.D.
- Phone Number: +34678195618
- Email: manutabo@yahoo.es
-
Contact:
- María Teresa Cabaleiro Ocampo
- Phone Number: +34 981 951 628
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) and require mechanical ventilation through a tracheal tube.
- Adult (age ≥ 18 years)
- Written informed consent from the patient or proxy (if present) before inclusion or once possible when patient has been included in a context of emergency.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal of study participation or to pursue the study by the patient
- Pregnancy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Endotracheal Tube with Stylet
Patients randomised to Endotracheal Tube with Stylet will be intubated with a Videolaryngoscopy and with a endotracheal tube + stylet.
|
Patients randomised to Endotracheal Tube with Stylet will be intubated with a Videolaryngoscopy and with a endotracheal tube + stylet.
|
Active Comparator: Flexible Tip Bougie
Patients randomised to Flexible Tip Bougie will be intubated with a Videolaryngoscopy and with a Flexible Tip Bougie.
|
Patients randomised to Flexible Tip Bougie will be intubated with a Videolaryngoscopy and with a Flexible Tip Bougie.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Difference in the first attempt success rate (percentage)
Time Frame: during intubation
|
To compare the difference in the first attempt success rate (percentage) of different techniques for tracheal intubation.
|
during intubation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Difference in the overall success rate (percentage)
Time Frame: during intubation
|
To compare the difference overall success rate (percentage) of different techniques for tracheal intubation.
|
during intubation
|
Difference in the incidence of complications related to intubation
Time Frame: Participants will be followed from the beginning of the intervention to 30 minutes after the intervention
|
To compare the difference in complications (percentage) of different techniques for tracheal intubation: Hypoxemia (SpO2) < 90 %, Hypoxemia severe (SpO2) < 80 %, Hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure less than 80 mm Hg, Severe hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure less than 65 mm Hg, Cardiac arrest, death during intubation, Moderate or difficult intubation, oesophageal intubation, pulmonary aspiration, dental injuries. |
Participants will be followed from the beginning of the intervention to 30 minutes after the intervention
|
Difficulty of intubation
Time Frame: during intubation
|
Operator-assessed subjective difficulty of intubation by means of a special analogue numerical scale from 0 to 10, where 0=no subjective difficulty and 10=maximal subjective difficulty
|
during intubation
|
Modified Cormack-Lehane grade of glottic view
Time Frame: during intubation
|
Modified Cormack-Lehane grade of glottic view: I: full view of the glottis IIa: partial view of the glottis IIb: arytenoid or posterior part of the vocal cords just visible III: only epiglottis visible IV: neither glottis nor epiglottis visible |
during intubation
|
Additional airway equipment
Time Frame: during intubation
|
Need for additional airway equipment
|
during intubation
|
Number of intubation attempts
Time Frame: during intubation
|
Number of intubation attempts
|
during intubation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Manuel Taboada Muñiz, Ph.D., University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ruetzler K, Smereka J, Abelairas-Gomez C, Frass M, Dabrowski M, Bialka S, Misiolek H, Plusa T, Robak O, Aniolek O, Ladny JR, Gorczyca D, Ahuja S, Szarpak L. Comparison of the new flexible tip bougie catheter and standard bougie stylet for tracheal intubation by anesthesiologists in different difficult airway scenarios: a randomized crossover trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Apr 20;20(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01009-7.
- Driver BE, Prekker ME, Klein LR, Reardon RF, Miner JR, Fagerstrom ET, Cleghorn MR, McGill JW, Cole JB. Effect of Use of a Bougie vs Endotracheal Tube and Stylet on First-Attempt Intubation Success Among Patients With Difficult Airways Undergoing Emergency Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Jun 5;319(21):2179-2189. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.6496.
- Driver BE, Semler MW, Self WH, Ginde AA, Trent SA, Gandotra S, Smith LM, Page DB, Vonderhaar DJ, West JR, Joffe AM, Mitchell SH, Doerschug KC, Hughes CG, High K, Landsperger JS, Jackson KE, Howell MP, Robison SW, Gaillard JP, Whitson MR, Barnes CM, Latimer AJ, Koppurapu VS, Alvis BD, Russell DW, Gibbs KW, Wang L, Lindsell CJ, Janz DR, Rice TW, Prekker ME, Casey JD; BOUGIE Investigators and the Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Effect of Use of a Bougie vs Endotracheal Tube With Stylet on Successful Intubation on the First Attempt Among Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Dec 28;326(24):2488-2497. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.22002.
- Jaber S, Rolle A, Godet T, Terzi N, Riu B, Asfar P, Bourenne J, Ramin S, Lemiale V, Quenot JP, Guitton C, Prudhomme E, Quemeneur C, Blondonnet R, Biais M, Muller L, Ouattara A, Ferrandiere M, Saint-Leger P, Rimmele T, Pottecher J, Chanques G, Belafia F, Chauveton C, Huguet H, Asehnoune K, Futier E, Azoulay E, Molinari N, De Jong A; STYLETO trial group. Effect of the use of an endotracheal tube and stylet versus an endotracheal tube alone on first-attempt intubation success: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial in 999 patients. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Jun;47(6):653-664. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06417-y. Epub 2021 May 25.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- VIDEOLAR-FLEXTIP-ICU
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Intubation; Difficult or Failed
-
Catharina Ziekenhuis EindhovenCompletedAnesthesia Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult | Failed or Difficult Intubation | Failed or Difficult Intubation, Initial EncounterNetherlands
-
Lazarski UniversityCompletedIntubation; Difficult or Failed | Difficult Airway | Intubation;DifficultPoland
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedIntubation Complication | Intubation;Difficult | Failed or Difficult Intubation, SequelaUnited States, Canada, Singapore
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)RecruitingIntubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult | Failed or Difficult Intubation, SequelaUnited States, Canada, Japan, Italy, New Zealand, Singapore, Australia, Austria, Germany, India, United Kingdom
-
Eskisehir Osmangazi UniversityCompletedIntubation; Difficult or Failed | Difficult LaryngoscopyTurkey
-
B.P. Koirala Institute of Health SciencesUnknownIntubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedNepal
-
Spanish Network for Research in Infectious DiseasesCompletedIntubation | Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedSpain
-
Groupe Hospitalier de Bretagne SudCentre National d'Etudes SpatialesCompletedIntubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedFrance
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedIntubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedKorea, Republic of
-
Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart HospitalNot yet recruitingIntubation; Difficult or Failed
Clinical Trials on Endotracheal Tube with Stylet
-
Karaman Training and Research HospitalCompleted
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterCompletedAcute Respiratory FailureUnited States
-
University Hospital, MontpellierCompletedCritically Ill | Intubation ComplicationFrance
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkTrygFonden, DenmarkCompletedAnaesthesia | Intubation ComplicationDenmark
-
Hospital Clinico Universitario de SantiagoRecruitingIntubation; Difficult or FailedSpain
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...CompletedEndotracheal IntubationUnited States
-
Nantes University HospitalRecruitingAcute Respiratory Failure Requiring IntubationFrance
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedIntubation, Intratracheal | Thoracic Surgical ProceduresKorea, Republic of
-
Eunah Cho, MDCompleted
-
Cukurova UniversityCompletedEndotracheal IntubationTurkey