Safety and Efficacy of OGT Method Versus the Traditional Overlap Method (OGT)

Safety and Efficacy of OGT-assisted Overlap Esophagojejunostomy Versus the Traditional Overlap Method in Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction (G/GEJ) Tumors

Introduction: The safety and efficiency of OGT-assisted method have not yet been compared with conventional overlap approach.

Methods Retrospectively analyses the data of 155 gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy by conventional(conventional group, n=83) or OGT-assisted (OGT group, n=72) overlap methods at Nanfang Hospital. The anastomotic efficiency and surgical outcomes were compared between two groups.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Although our previous multicenter randomized controlled trial (CLASS-01) has confirmed the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer[1, 2], the feasibility of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) remains uncertain. The most challenging technical difficulty of LTG is esophagojejunostomy(ESJ)[3, 4]. At present, there is still no consensus on the ideal anastomosis method for EJ.

Since overlap esophagojejunostomy was first proposed in 2010[5], it has gradually gone mainstream because of its lower incidence of anastomotic-related complications and satisfactory short-term outcomes[6-10]. However, the overlap approach is technically-difficult and time-consuming, and might confront intraoperative construction complications, such as injuring esophagus caused by the repetition of inserting anvil fork into esophagus or developing esophageal submucosa pseudocanals(video 1 and 2). Therefore, we first designed an overlap guiding tube (OGT)-assisted method to overcame above limitations[11]. And the first reported about the application of OGT-assisted method preliminarily indicated that it is safe and feasible, with a satisfactory success rate of inserting anvil fork into esophageal lumen at first attempt and esophagojejunostomy time[11]. However, the safety and efficiency of OGT-assisted method have not yet been compared side-by-side with the conventional overlap approach. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the OGT-assisted and conventional overlap methods in terms of feasibility and safety in LTG for gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) tumors.

Methods Patients One hundred and fifty-five patients with G/GEJ cancer undergoing LTG via either the conventional overlap esophagojejunostomy(conventional group) or OGT-assisted overlap esophagojejunostomy (OGT group) in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, between June 2018 and February 2022 were initially eligible for the study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1)gastric cancer was confirmed by pathological examination; (2) tumor located in GEJ with involving esophagus no more than 2cm or the upper, upper to the middle, or entire stomach; (3) had no obvious operative contraindication; and (4) aged 18-85 years. The pathological staging was based on the TNM system of the 8th edition of the International Federation for the prevention and treatment of cancer[12]. This study meets the requirements of the Helsinki Declaration revised in 2013. Patients and their families signed informed consent forms before operation. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline. The data collection protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University. Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients in the study.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

155

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510515
        • Nanfang Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients enrolled in our study underwent standard LTG with D2 lymphadenectomy according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association treatment guidelines

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • (1)gastric cancer was confirmed by pathological examination; (2) tumor located in GEJ with involving esophagus no more than 2cm or the upper, upper to the middle, or entire stomach; (3) had no obvious operative contraindication; and (4) aged 18-85 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Null.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
The conventional overlap group
In conventional overlap group, after firing the stapler, two openings were converted into a single entry hole to create an end-to-side esophagojejunostomy, and the entry hole was closed with full-thickness running suture using barbed sutures intracorporeally.
After firing the stapler, two openings were converted into a single entry hole to create an end-to-side esophagojejunostomy, and the entry hole was closed with full-thickness running suture using barbed sutures intracorporeally.
The OGT-assisted group
In OGT group, the anvil fork was inserted into the esophageal mucosa canal by movement of the connection of fork-OGT-gastric tube.
The overlap guiding tube(OGT) is used to assist the anvil fork placed into the esophageal cavity.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The rate of early postoperative complications.
Time Frame: 30 Days
  1. Surgery-related complications: wound complications (infection, effusion, dehiscence,poor healing), intra-abdominal active bleeding,digestive tract active bleeding, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stenosis, intestinal fistula, pancreatic fistula, chylous fistula, intra-abdominal abscess formation, gastroparesis, intestinal paralysis, intestinal obstruction, cholecystitis, pancreatitis, etc.
  2. System-related complications: pneumonia, pleural effusion, pulmonary embolism, cardiocerebrovascular complications, deep venous thrombosis, urinary tract complications, catheter-related complications, condition of pain,etc.;
30 Days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The success rate of inserting anvil fork into esophageal lumen at first attempt
Time Frame: 1 Days
Inserting anvil fork into esophageal lumen at first attempt: when inserting the anvil fork into the esophageal hole, the anvil fork can be correctly placed in a satisfactory position and at a satisfactory angle into the esophageal mucosa canal to be fired for esophagojejunostomy by inserting it only once.
1 Days
Attempts of inserting anvil fork into esophagus
Time Frame: 1 Days
The number of times required to try to insert the anvil fork in a satisfactory position and at a satisfactory angle into the esophageal mucosa canal to be fired for esophagojejunostomy.
1 Days
Time of esophagojejunostomy
Time Frame: 1 Days
Time of esophagojejunostomy was defined as the time from making the entry hole for the anastomosis on the esophageal stump to the time the common entry hole was closed and reinforced using barbed threads
1 Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jiang Yu, Prof., Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

One hundred and fifty-five patients with G/GEJ cancer undergoing LTG via either the conventional overlap esophagojejunostomy(conventional group) or OGT-assisted overlap esophagojejunostomy (OGT group) in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, between June 2018 and February 2022 were initially eligible for the study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1)gastric cancer was confirmed by pathological examination; (2) tumor located in GEJ with involving esophagus no more than 2cm or the upper, upper to the middle, or entire stomach; (3) had no obvious operative contraindication; and (4) aged 18-85 years.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

July,2022-December 2023.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

All accessing are approved.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastric Cancer

Clinical Trials on The conventional overlap method

3
Subscribe