- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05455229
Elucidating How Physical Activity and Sleep Relate to Optimal Cognitive Ageing (PASOCA)
Elucidating How Physical Activity and Sleep Relate to Optimal Cognitive Ageing: the PASOCA- Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Vlaams-Brabant
-
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium, 3000
- KU Leuven
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Community dwelling, healthy adults aged 55 and above
Exclusion Criteria:
- has a neurodegenerative disease such as Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, MS…; or
- has a psychiatric illness such as bipolar disorder, OCD…; or
- has had a serious brain injury in the past year or before that is still affecting them; or
- has had a brain haemorrhage; or
- is currently experiencing a depressive episode; or
- has a history of addiction or excessive alcohol abuse; or
- uses a sleeping device (for sleep apnoea); or
- has chronic insomnia (diagnosed insomnia); or
- is severely limited in performing daily activities (up and down stairs, walk ...)
- has a first-degree dementia within the family
- scores a 23 or lower on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Cognitive function (baseline) - objective: executive function and memory will be tested with Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB)
Time Frame: baseline
|
Executive functions and memory will be the main outcome measure for cognitive function. Executive control (planning, shifting, inhibiting, attention) and memory (visuospatial, episodic, verbal) functions will be measured objectively using an iPad with the validated CANTAB software (cambridgecognition.com). Specific tasks in the test battery:
|
baseline
|
Change in cognitive function (follow up 1) - objective: executive function and memory will be tested with Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB)
Time Frame: 1 year after baseline
|
Executive functions and memory will be the main outcome measure for cognitive function. Executive control (planning, shifting, inhibiting, attention) and memory (visuospatial, episodic, verbal) functions will be measured objectively using an iPad with the validated CANTAB software (cambridgecognition.com). Specific tasks in the test battery:
|
1 year after baseline
|
Change in cognitive function (follow up 2) - objective: executive function and memory will be tested with Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB)
Time Frame: 1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
Executive functions and memory will be the main outcome measure for cognitive function. Executive control (planning, shifting, inhibiting, attention) and memory (visuospatial, episodic, verbal) functions will be measured objectively using an iPad with the validated CANTAB software (cambridgecognition.com). Specific tasks in the test battery:
|
1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
Cognitive function (baseline) - subjective: Cognitive Failure Questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline
|
25-items will be used to measure subjective cognitive decline by assessing self-reported frequency of failures in several cognitive domains.
|
baseline
|
Change in cognitive function (follow up 1) - subjective: Cognitive Failure Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 year after baseline
|
25-items will be used to measure subjective cognitive decline by assessing self-reported frequency of failures in several cognitive domains.
|
1 year after baseline
|
Change in cognitive function (follow up 2) - subjective: Cognitive Failure Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
25-items will be used to measure subjective cognitive decline by assessing self-reported frequency of failures in several cognitive domains.
|
1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
Sleep (baseline) - objective: accelerometery - characteristic 1: total sleep time
Time Frame: baseline
|
Specifically ActiGraph's wGT3X-BT Activity Monitor (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL).
Placement at the wrist results in the increased wear time and accuracy of sleep measurement.
Total sleep time is measured in minutes.
|
baseline
|
Sleep (baseline) - objective: accelerometery - characteristic 2: wake after sleep onset
Time Frame: baseline
|
Specifically ActiGraph's wGT3X-BT Activity Monitor (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL).
Placement at the wrist results in the increased wear time and accuracy of sleep measurement.
Wake after sleep onset is measured in minutes.
|
baseline
|
Sleep (baseline) - objective: accelerometery - characteristic 3: sleep efficiency
Time Frame: baseline
|
Specifically ActiGraph's wGT3X-BT Activity Monitor (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL).
Placement at the wrist results in the increased wear time and accuracy of sleep measurement.
Sleep efficiency is displayed in percentage.
|
baseline
|
Sleep (baseline) - objective: accelerometery - characteristic 4: sleep latency
Time Frame: baseline
|
Specifically ActiGraph's wGT3X-BT Activity Monitor (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL).
Placement at the wrist results in the increased wear time and accuracy of sleep measurement.
Sleep latency is measured in minutes.
|
baseline
|
Change in sleep (follow up 1) - objective: accelerometery - characteristic 1: total sleep time
Time Frame: 1 year after baseline
|
Specifically ActiGraph's wGT3X-BT Activity Monitor (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL).
Placement at the wrist results in the increased wear time and accuracy of sleep measurement.
Total sleep time is measured in minutes.
|
1 year after baseline
|
Change in sleep (follow up 1) - objective: accelerometery - characteristic 2: wake after sleep onset
Time Frame: 1 year after baseline
|
Specifically ActiGraph's wGT3X-BT Activity Monitor (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL).
Placement at the wrist results in the increased wear time and accuracy of sleep measurement.
Wake after sleep onset is measured in minutes.
|
1 year after baseline
|
Change in sleep (follow up 1) - objective: accelerometery - characteristic 3: sleep efficiency
Time Frame: 1 year after baseline
|
Specifically ActiGraph's wGT3X-BT Activity Monitor (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL).
Placement at the wrist results in the increased wear time and accuracy of sleep measurement.
Sleep efficiency is displayed in percentage.
|
1 year after baseline
|
Change in sleep (follow up 1) - objective: accelerometery - characteristic 4: sleep latency
Time Frame: 1 year after baseline
|
Specifically ActiGraph's wGT3X-BT Activity Monitor (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL).
Placement at the wrist results in the increased wear time and accuracy of sleep measurement.
Sleep latency is measured in minutes.
|
1 year after baseline
|
Change in sleep (follow up 2) - objective: accelerometery - characteristic 1: total sleep time
Time Frame: 1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
Specifically ActiGraph's wGT3X-BT Activity Monitor (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL).
Placement at the wrist results in the increased wear time and accuracy of sleep measurement.
Total sleep time is measured in minutes.
|
1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
Change in sleep (follow up 2) - objective: accelerometery - characteristic 2: wake after
Time Frame: 1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
Specifically ActiGraph's wGT3X-BT Activity Monitor (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL).
Placement at the wrist results in the increased wear time and accuracy of sleep measurement.
Wake after sleep onset is measured in minutes.
|
1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
Change in sleep (follow up 2) - objective: accelerometery - characteristic 3: sleep efficiency
Time Frame: 1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
Specifically ActiGraph's wGT3X-BT Activity Monitor (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL).
Placement at the wrist results in the increased wear time and accuracy of sleep measurement.
Sleep efficiency is displayed in percentage.
|
1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
Change in sleep (follow up 2) - objective: accelerometery - characteristic 4: sleep latency
Time Frame: 1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
Specifically ActiGraph's wGT3X-BT Activity Monitor (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL).
Placement at the wrist results in the increased wear time and accuracy of sleep measurement.
Sleep latency is measured in minutes.
|
1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
Sleep (baseline) - subjective: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The PSQI is a reliable and validated self-report questionnaire that examines the quality of sleep in the past month.
It contains of 19 self-rated questions and 5 questions rated by the bed partner or roommate (if available), covering seven sleep areas: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction.
|
Baseline
|
Change in sleep (follow up 1) - subjective: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: 1 year after baseline
|
The PSQI is a reliable and validated self-report questionnaire that examines the quality of sleep in the past month.
It contains of 19 self-rated questions and 5 questions rated by the bed partner or roommate (if available), covering seven sleep areas: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction.
|
1 year after baseline
|
Change in sleep (follow up 2) - subjective: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: 1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
The PSQI is a reliable and validated self-report questionnaire that examines the quality of sleep in the past month.
It contains of 19 self-rated questions and 5 questions rated by the bed partner or roommate (if available), covering seven sleep areas: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction.
|
1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
Physical activity & Sedentary behaviour (baseline) - objective: accelerometery 1
Time Frame: baseline
|
ActiGraph's wGT3X-BT Activity Monitor (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL) will be used.
It measures time spent in different intensities of physical activity as well as sedentary behaviour and sleep.
Participants will be asked to wear the accelerometer continuously during seven consecutive days, day and night, at their non-dominant wrist.
In addition to wearing the accelerometer, participants will be asked to fill in a daily succinct diary with: (1) bed times, nap times; (2) non-wear times during the day; and (3) specification of most seated activity.
These data will be used to complete and to explain gaps in the data set later on in the software programme.
The following PA outcomes will be extracted from the ActiGraph data: average time spent per day in sedentary behaviour, light PA and moderate to vigorous PA.
|
baseline
|
Physical activity & Sedentary behaviour (baseline) - objective: accelerometery 2
Time Frame: baseline
|
A second accelerometer will be placed on the right thigh, namely the activPAL (PAL Technologies Ltd, Glasgow, UK).
This device measures postures due to its static acceleration and inclination features.
It can quantify postural allocation - which is not possible with the ActiGraph - and is completely waterproof.
The following additional PA outcomes will be extracted: time spent sitting/lying, standing, and walking.
|
baseline
|
Change in Physical activity & Sedentary behaviour (follow up 1) - objective: accelerometery 1
Time Frame: 1 year after baseline
|
ActiGraph's wGT3X-BT Activity Monitor (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL) will be used.
It measures time spent in different intensities of physical activity as well as sedentary behaviour and sleep.
Participants will be asked to wear the accelerometer continuously during seven consecutive days, day and night, at their non-dominant wrist.
In addition to wearing the accelerometer, participants will be asked to fill in a daily succinct diary with: (1) bed times, nap times; (2) non-wear times during the day; and (3) specification of most seated activity.
These data will be used to complete and to explain gaps in the data set later on in the software programme.
The following PA outcomes will be extracted from the ActiGraph data: average time spent per day in sedentary behaviour, light PA and moderate to vigorous PA.
|
1 year after baseline
|
Change in Physical activity & Sedentary behaviour (follow up 1) - objective: accelerometery 2
Time Frame: 1 year after baseline
|
A second accelerometer will be placed on the right thigh, namely the activPAL (PAL Technologies Ltd, Glasgow, UK).
This device measures postures due to its static acceleration and inclination features.
It can quantify postural allocation - which is not possible with the ActiGraph - and is completely waterproof.
The following additional PA outcomes will be extracted: time spent sitting/lying, standing, and walking.
|
1 year after baseline
|
Change in Physical activity & Sedentary behaviour (follow up 2) - objective: accelerometery 1
Time Frame: 1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
ActiGraph's wGT3X-BT Activity Monitor (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL) will be used.
It measures time spent in different intensities of physical activity as well as sedentary behaviour and sleep.
Participants will be asked to wear the accelerometer continuously during seven consecutive days, day and night, at their non-dominant wrist.
In addition to wearing the accelerometer, participants will be asked to fill in a daily succinct diary with: (1) bed times, nap times; (2) non-wear times during the day; and (3) specification of most seated activity.
These data will be used to complete and to explain gaps in the data set later on in the software programme.
The following PA outcomes will be extracted from the ActiGraph data: average time spent per day in sedentary behaviour, light PA and moderate to vigorous PA.
|
1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
Change in Physical activity & Sedentary behaviour (follow up 2) - objective: accelerometery 2
Time Frame: 1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
A second accelerometer will be placed on the right thigh, namely the activPAL (PAL Technologies Ltd, Glasgow, UK).
This device measures postures due to its static acceleration and inclination features.
It can quantify postural allocation - which is not possible with the ActiGraph - and is completely waterproof.
The following additional PA outcomes will be extracted: time spent sitting/lying, standing, and walking.
|
1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
Physical activity & Sedentary behaviour (baseline) - subjective: International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQSF)
Time Frame: baseline
|
The IPAQ-SF is a 7-question measure that assesses frequency and duration of vigorous PA, moderate PA, walking during the past 7 days, as well as time spent sitting.
|
baseline
|
Change in Physical activity & Sedentary behaviour (follow up 1) - subjective: International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQSF)
Time Frame: 1 year after baseline
|
The IPAQ-SF is a 7-question measure that assesses frequency and duration of vigorous PA, moderate PA, walking during the past 7 days, as well as time spent sitting.
|
1 year after baseline
|
Change in Physical activity & Sedentary behaviour (follow up 2) - subjective: International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQSF)
Time Frame: 1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
The IPAQ-SF is a 7-question measure that assesses frequency and duration of vigorous PA, moderate PA, walking during the past 7 days, as well as time spent sitting.
|
1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
Physical activity (baseline) - subjective: muscle strengthening activity questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline
|
Translated version of Muscle-strengthening exercise: Assessing participation and influences - J. Shakespear-Druery, dr.
J. Bennie, dr.
Katrien De Cocker & prof.
S. Biddle to assess frequency, intensity and duration.
|
baseline
|
Change in Physical activity (follow up 1) - subjective: muscle strengthening activity questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 year after baseline
|
Translated version of Muscle-strengthening exercise: Assessing participation and influences - J. Shakespear-Druery, dr.
J. Bennie, dr.
Katrien De Cocker & prof.
S. Biddle to assess frequency, intensity and duration.
|
1 year after baseline
|
Change in Physical activity (follow up 2) - subjective: muscle strengthening activity questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
Translated version of Muscle-strengthening exercise: Assessing participation and influences - J. Shakespear-Druery, dr.
J. Bennie, dr.
Katrien De Cocker & prof.
S. Biddle to assess frequency, intensity and duration.
|
1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Wellbeing (baseline) - Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS)
Time Frame: baseline
|
The 14-item scale WEMWBS has 5 response categories, summed to provide a single score
|
baseline
|
Wellbeing (follow up 1) - Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS)
Time Frame: 1 year after baseline
|
The 14-item scale WEMWBS has 5 response categories, summed to provide a single score
|
1 year after baseline
|
Wellbeing (follow up 2) - Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS)
Time Frame: 1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
The 14-item scale WEMWBS has 5 response categories, summed to provide a single score
|
1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
Global health (baseline) - PROMIS Global health
Time Frame: baseline
|
10-item questionnaire on health
|
baseline
|
Global health (baseline) - PROMIS Global health
Time Frame: 1 year after baseline
|
10-item questionnaire on health
|
1 year after baseline
|
Global health (follow up 2) - PROMIS Global health
Time Frame: 1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
10-item questionnaire on health
|
1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
Depression (baseline) - The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15)
Time Frame: baseline
|
15-item questionnaire on depressive symptoms
|
baseline
|
Depression (follow up 1) - The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15)
Time Frame: 1 year after baseline
|
15-item questionnaire on depressive symptoms
|
1 year after baseline
|
Depression (follow up 2) - The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15)
Time Frame: 1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
15-item questionnaire on depressive symptoms
|
1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
Loneliness (baseline) - de Jong Gierveld loneliness scale (DJG loneliness)
Time Frame: baseline
|
The 11-item de Jong Gierveld loneliness scale is a multi-dimensional measure of loneliness and contains five positively worded and six negatively worded items.
The items fall into four subscales; feelings of severe loneliness, feelings connected with specific problem situations, missing companionship, feelings of belongingness.
|
baseline
|
Loneliness (follow up 1) - de Jong Gierveld loneliness scale (DJG loneliness)
Time Frame: 1 year after baseline
|
The 11-item de Jong Gierveld loneliness scale is a multi-dimensional measure of loneliness and contains five positively worded and six negatively worded items.
The items fall into four subscales; feelings of severe loneliness, feelings connected with specific problem situations, missing companionship, feelings of belongingness.
|
1 year after baseline
|
Loneliness (follow up 2) - de Jong Gierveld loneliness scale (DJG loneliness)
Time Frame: 1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
The 11-item de Jong Gierveld loneliness scale is a multi-dimensional measure of loneliness and contains five positively worded and six negatively worded items.
The items fall into four subscales; feelings of severe loneliness, feelings connected with specific problem situations, missing companionship, feelings of belongingness.
|
1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
Social network (baseline) - Lubben Social Network Scale (LSN-6)
Time Frame: baseline
|
LSNS-6 provides quantitative information on their family and friendship ties, and identifies persons at increased risk for social isolation
|
baseline
|
Social network (follow up 1) - Lubben Social Network Scale (LSN-6)
Time Frame: 1 year after baseline
|
LSNS-6 provides quantitative information on their family and friendship ties, and identifies persons at increased risk for social isolation
|
1 year after baseline
|
Social network (follow up 2) - Lubben Social Network Scale (LSN-6)
Time Frame: 1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
LSNS-6 provides quantitative information on their family and friendship ties, and identifies persons at increased risk for social isolation
|
1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
Expectations Regarding Aging (baseline) - 12-Item Expectations Regarding Aging survey
Time Frame: baseline
|
12-Item Expectations Regarding Aging
|
baseline
|
Expectations Regarding Aging (follow-up 1) - 12-Item Expectations Regarding Aging survey
Time Frame: 1 year after baseline
|
12-Item Expectations Regarding Aging
|
1 year after baseline
|
Expectations Regarding Aging (follow-up 2) - 12-Item Expectations Regarding Aging survey
Time Frame: 1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
12-Item Expectations Regarding Aging
|
1 year after follow up 1; 2 years after baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- PASOCA_2021
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Researchers with a track record in the field of healthy ageing or physical activity and health and proven experience in the analysis of variables as collected in the study will be able to access the data.
Data from the project that can be shared will be made available under a Creative Commons attribution license (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0) so that users have to give credit to the original data creators.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cognitive Aging
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentVA Boston Healthcare SystemRecruitingCognitive AgingUnited States
-
University of CincinnatiU.S. Highbush Blueberry Council; Welch Foods IncorporatedCompleted
-
University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedCognitive AgingUnited States
-
Florida State UniversityCompletedCognitive AgingUnited States
-
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche...Unknown
-
University of FloridaNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedCognitive AgingUnited States
-
University of ExeterCompleted
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedCognitive Change | AgingUnited States
-
Jeanne Townsend, PhDNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Unknown
-
Columbia UniversityBrigham and Women's Hospital; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center; Mars, Inc.CompletedCognitive Change | AgingUnited States