Reduce High-risk Behaviours Under Chronic Stress Via tDCS-induced Neural Plasticity

August 15, 2022 updated by: LI Cheng

The persistent political conflicts and COVID-19 pandemic have led to elevated chronic stress levels in Hong Kong, with far-reaching and profound negative impacts on the citizen's mental health. An important pathway via which chronic stress negatively impacts health is through promoting high-risk behaviours, such as addiction, suicide, and antisocial acts. Therefore, testing means to break the association between chronic stress and high-risk behaviour is essential to reducing the adverse consequences of stress and promoting stress resilience. The transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may be a viable method for reducing risky tendency in high-stress individuals, through modulating brain functions and plasticity. Although single-session tDCS has been shown to reliably reduce risky decision making and behaviours acutely, its efficacy over extended periods of time has not been demonstrated, particularly among non-clinical samples. Being able to show that tDCS could lead to long-lasting reduction of risky tendency is necessary for promoting the wide application of this method in therapeutic settings. In this project, we aim to conduct a randomised control trial to systematically and comprehensively test whether 10 sessions of tDCS on either the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex or the orbitofrontal cortex would lead to reduction in risky tendency not only immediately after treatment, but also at 1 month and 3 months after treatment.

Participants will be healthy male and female adults (21-40 years old) under relatively high levels of chronic stress, as selected from an online survey prior to the study.

Participants will be randomly allocated to one of 3 treatment groups: DLPFC tDCS, OFC tDCS, and sham control. At baseline, participants will complete several risk-taking assessments, including an established computerised task that measures both risk taking and a cognitive bias that was shown to increase irrational risky tendency (illusion of control), an established questionnaire that measures risky decision making in real-life scenarios, and a scale measuring past engagement in common risky activities.

Participants will also complete various personality and mood questionnaires, along with assessments on important cognitive abilities. We hypothesized that both DLPFC and OFC tDCS would reduce risk taking across the 3 timepoints, but the effect of DLPFC tDCS would be mediated by reduction in cognitive bias, whereas that of OFC tDCS would be mediated by increase in inhibition functions. These hypotheses will be tested by linear mixed models and mediation analyses. Additional exploratory analyses also test whether the tDCS effect would be moderated by relevant personality factors such as impulsivity.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

255

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged between 21-40 years;
  • Fluent in reading and writing Chinese (Cantonese or Mandarin);
  • Right-handed as assessed with the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory;
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal vision and hearing;
  • IQ>90 as assessed with the Test of Nonverbal Intelligence, 4th edition (TONI-IV)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Past or present physical illness, organic brain disorder, traumatic brain injury, addiction, impulse control disorder, psychotic disorder, affective disorder, or any other major neurological or psychological condition;
  • First-degree relative with past or present major psychological disorder or suicidal behaviour;
  • Intake of psychotropic medication or any other medication that may affect cognition in the 6 months preceding the study day;
  • (For women) being pregnant;
  • any contraindication for tDCS, such as having a cerebral implant or history (either personal or family) of seizure. The psychological conditions will be assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders-Clinician Version (SCID-5-CV).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: right DLPFC tDCS
Participants in this group will receive 10 sessions of right DLPFC tDCS
The transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) method has emerged in the recent years as a non-invasive, safe, cheap, convenient and effective means to modulate brain functions and behaviours
Experimental: right OFC tDCS
Participants in this group will receive 10 sessions of right OFC tDCS
The transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) method has emerged in the recent years as a non-invasive, safe, cheap, convenient and effective means to modulate brain functions and behaviours
Sham Comparator: Control group
Participants in this group will receive 10 sessions of sham stimulation
For the sham group, the electrode positioning will be randomly allocated to be identical to either the DLPFC or the OFC group, and active stimulation will be delivered for the first 30 seconds only

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in risk taking behavior
Time Frame: Baseline; 1-month follow up; 3-month follow up
Changes in risk taking will be assessed using the IoC card gambling task
Baseline; 1-month follow up; 3-month follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 11, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • tDCSHKU

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Risk-Taking

Clinical Trials on tDCS stimulation

3
Subscribe