A Study to Learn About the Medicine (Called Elranatamab) in People With Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma

October 30, 2023 updated by: Pfizer

Comparative Effectiveness of Elranatamab (PF 06863135) in Clinical Study C1071003 Versus Standard of Care (SOC) in Real-World (RW) External Control Arms in Patients With Triple-Class Refractory (TCR) Multiple Myeloma (MM)

This study is to understand how well elranatamab (PF-06863135) may be used for relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Sometimes MM might improve at first, but then gets resistant to the treatment and starts growing again (known as relapsed refractory). This study medicine will be compared with standard-of-care (SOC) therapies used in real-world clinical practice. For people receiving elranatamab, we will use data from the phase 2 clinical trial (MagnetisMM-3). We will also use data from two real-world databases, representing the SOC in clinical practice. This study does not seek any participants for enrollment. We will compare the experiences of people receiving elranatamab to people receiving SOC therapies. This way, it will help us to know how well elranatamab can be used for RRMM treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

508

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10001
        • Pfizer

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients treated with elranatamab will come from the MagnetisMM-3 trial. Patients treated with the standard-of-care therapies will come from electronic health record databases in the United States.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 years and older at index date
  • Diagnosis of MM
  • Measurable disease according to IMWG criteria
  • ECOG performance status ≤2
  • Refractory to at least 1 proteasome inhibitor, 1 immunomodulatory drug, and 1 anti-CD38 treatment (ie, triple-class refractory [TCR])
  • At least 1 treatment following their TCR eligibility

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute plasma cell leukemia
  • Amyloidosis
  • Smoldering MM
  • Stem cell transplant within 12 weeks of index or active graft versus host disease (GVHD)
  • Active malignancy within 3 years before index, except for basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ
  • Administration with an investigational drug within 30 days prior to index

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Elranatamab
Patients treated with elranatamab from the MagnetisMM-3 trial
BCMA-CD3 bispecific antibody
Standard of care
Patients treated with standard-of-care therapies from real-world data sources
Standard of care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective Response Rate (ORR)-Unweighted Analysis
Time Frame: From index date until first documentation of progression, death, or the start of new anticancer therapy (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts)
ORR was the percentage of participants with objective response (OR) per IMWG criteria. For the analysis set of participants from Study C1071003 and COTA, OR was partial response (PR) or better (stringent complete response [sCR]+complete response [CR]+very good partial response [VGPR]+PR). For Study C1071003 and Flatiron Health, OR was PR or better (at least VGPR+PR). sCR: CR & normal serum free light chain (sFLC) ratio & absence of clonal cells in BMB/BMA by IH, IF, or flow cytometry. CR: negative immunofixation on serum & urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytoma & <5% plasma cells in BMA, if measured by sFLC only, preceding criteria + normal sFLC ratio. VGPR: Serum & urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis; or >=90% reduction in serum & urine M-protein level <100mg/24h. PR: >=50% reduction in serum M-protein & reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by >=90% or <200 mg/24h. Clopper-Pearson two-sided 95% exact confidence intervals were estimated.
From index date until first documentation of progression, death, or the start of new anticancer therapy (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts)
Objective Response Rate-Comparison Between Elranatamab in Study C1071003 Cohort A and COTA Cohort Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weights (IPTW) Analysis
Time Frame: From index date until first documentation of progression, death, or the start of new anticancer therapy (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts)
ORR was the percentage of participants with an OR per IMWG criteria. For the analysis set of participants from Study C1071003 and COTA, the OR was defined as PR or better (sCR + CR + VGPR + PR). For Study C1071003 and Flatiron Health, OR was defined as PR or better (at least VGPR + PR). sCR: CR & normal serum free light chain (sFLC) ratio & absence of clonal cells in BMB/BMA by IH, IF, or flow cytometry. CR: negative immunofixation on serum & urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytoma & <5% plasma cells in BMA, if measured by sFLC only, preceding criteria + normal sFLC ratio. VGPR: Serum & urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis; or >=90% reduction in serum & urine M-protein level <100mg/24h. PR: >=50% reduction in serum M-protein & reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by >=90% or <200 mg/24h. Analysis was performed using IPTW method to balance participant characteristics among reporting groups.
From index date until first documentation of progression, death, or the start of new anticancer therapy (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts)
Objective Response Rate-Comparison Between Elranatamab in Study C1071003 Cohort A and Flatiron Health Cohort Using IPTW Analysis
Time Frame: From index date until first documentation of progression, death, or the start of new anticancer therapy (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts)
ORR was the percentage of participants with an OR per IMWG criteria. For the analysis set of participants from Study C1071003 and COTA, the OR was defined as PR or better (sCR + CR + VGPR + PR). For Study C1071003 and Flatiron Health, OR was defined as PR or better (at least VGPR + PR). sCR: CR & normal serum free light chain (sFLC) ratio & absence of clonal cells in BMB/BMA by IH, IF, or flow cytometry. CR: negative immunofixation on serum & urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytoma & <5% plasma cells in BMA, if measured by sFLC only, preceding criteria + normal sFLC ratio. VGPR: Serum & urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis; or >=90% reduction in serum & urine M-protein level <100mg/24h. PR: >=50% reduction in serum M-protein & reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by >=90% or <200 mg/24h. Analysis was performed using IPTW method to balance participant characteristics among reporting groups.
From index date until first documentation of progression, death, or the start of new anticancer therapy (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Response (TTR)-Unweighted Analysis
Time Frame: From index date to date of first documentation of OR (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts)
TTR was defined as the time from the index date to the first documentation of OR. No censoring was performed. OR is defined as having a best overall response (BOR) of confirmed sCR, CR, VGPR or PR per IMWG criteria.
From index date to date of first documentation of OR (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts)
Time to Response (TTR)-Comparison Between Elranatamab in Study C1071003 Cohort A and COTA Cohort Using IPTW Analysis
Time Frame: From index date to date of first documentation of OR (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts)
TTR was defined as the time from the index date to the first documentation of OR. OR is defined as having a best overall response (BOR) of confirmed sCR, CR, VGPR or PR per IMWG criteria. Analysis was performed using IPTW method to balance participant characteristics among reporting groups.
From index date to date of first documentation of OR (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts)
Time to Response-Comparison Between Elranatamab in Study C1071003 Cohort A and Flatiron Health Cohort Using IPTW Analysis
Time Frame: From index date to date of first documentation of OR (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts)
TTR was defined as the time from the index date to the first documentation of OR. OR is defined as having a best overall response (BOR) of confirmed sCR, CR, VGPR or PR per IMWG criteria. Analysis was performed using IPTW method to balance participant characteristics among reporting groups.
From index date to date of first documentation of OR (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts)
Duration of Response (DOR)-Unweighted Analysis
Time Frame: From first documentation of OR until confirmed PD or death due to any cause or censoring date (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts)
DOR was defined as the time from the first documentation of OR, until confirmed disease progression (PD) per IMWG criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD= increase of >=25% from lowest value in >=1 of following (serum M-protein [absolute increase >=0.5g/dL]; serum M-protein increase >=1g/dL [when lowest M-protein >=5g/dL]; and urine M-protein [absolute increase >=200mg/24h]).
From first documentation of OR until confirmed PD or death due to any cause or censoring date (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts)
Duration of Response-Comparison Between Elranatamab in Study C1071003 Cohort A and COTA Cohort Using IPTW Analysis
Time Frame: From first documentation of OR until confirmed PD or death due to any cause or censoring date (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts)
DOR was defined as the time from the first documentation of OR, until confirmed disease progression (PD) per IMWG criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD= increase of >=25% from lowest value in >=1 of following (serum M-protein [absolute increase >=0.5g/dL]; serum M-protein increase >=1g/dL [when lowest M-protein >=5g/dL]; and urine M-protein [absolute increase >=200mg/24h]). Median and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) reported in the descriptive section was determined using unweighted analysis.
From first documentation of OR until confirmed PD or death due to any cause or censoring date (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts)
Duration of Response-Comparison Between Elranatamab in Study C1071003 Cohort A and Flatiron Health Cohort Using IPTW Analysis
Time Frame: From first documentation of OR until confirmed PD or death due to any cause or censoring date (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts)
DOR was defined as the time from the first documentation of OR, until confirmed disease progression (PD) per IMWG criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD= increase of >=25% from lowest value in >=1 of following (serum M-protein [absolute increase >=0.5g/dL]; serum M-protein increase >=1g/dL [when lowest M-protein >=5g/dL]; and urine M-protein [absolute increase >=200mg/24h]). Median and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) reported in the descriptive section was determined using unweighted analysis.
From first documentation of OR until confirmed PD or death due to any cause or censoring date (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 3, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 4, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

November 4, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Myeloma

Clinical Trials on Elranatamab

3
Subscribe