Crestal Sinus Technique Using Autologous Fibrin Glue Vs Sticky Bone With Simultaneous Implant Insertion.

November 10, 2022 updated by: Mansoura University

Minimal Invasive Crestal Sinus Technique Using Autologous Fibrin Glue Versus Sticky Bone With Simultaneous Implant Insertion. A Prospective Study

prospective comparison of minimal Invasive Crestal Sinus Technique Using Autologous Fibrin Glue Vs Sticky Bone with simultaneous implant insertion.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of applying fibrin glue versus sticky bone in conjunction with crestal sinus lift technique associated with simultaneous implant insertion.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Dakahlya
      • Mansoura, Dakahlya, Egypt, 35516
        • Mansoura University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- a) Patients should be willing to be present for regular timely follow up. b) Residual bone height range from 5 to 9mm c) Patent ostium of maxillary sinus. d) Patients having missing maxillary posterior teeth. e) Patient cooperation and compliance are indispensible for a predictable clinical outcome.

f) Patients free from any systemic disease

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1) Patients with systemic disease that prevent surgical intervention or bone healing.

    2) Patients with acute or chronic maxillary sinusitis. 3) Patients with cyst, tumor or root tips at the planned surgical site. 4) Heavy smoker patients. 5) Elderly patients (over 60 years). 6) Patients with Poor oral hygiene or aggressive periodontal diseases. 7) Lack of motivation or inability to maintain oral hygiene.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: fibrin glue group
Maxillary sinus augmentation using autologous fibrin glue with simultaneous implant placement
Maxillary sinus augmentation using autologous fibrin glue with simultaneous implant placement
Experimental: sticky bone group
Maxillary sinus augmentation using mixture of autologous fibrin glue with bone graft with simultaneous implant placement
Maxillary sinus augmentation using mixture of autologous fibrin glue with bone graft with simultaneous implant placement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implant stability
Time Frame: 3 months

implant stability using The Ostell ISQ scale: The ISQ scale ranges from 0 to 100 that measures implant stability. The values less than 60 indicate low implant stability; values from 60 to 69 indicate medium stability where values between 70 and 79 indicate high stability.

6 implants from each group will be assessed regarding implant stability at 3 months post-operative using this ISQ scale to determine implant stability and data will be analyzed statistically for significance.

3 months
Bleeding
Time Frame: 3 months

Peri-implant mucosal bleeding will be graded using criteria of modified sulcus bleeding index (mBI).

  • Score 0; no bleeding when a periodontal probe was passed along the gingival margin adjacent to the implant.
  • Score 1; isolated bleeding visible spot.
  • Score 2; a confluent red line on the gingival margin was formed by blood.
  • Score 3; heavy or profuse bleeding is present.
3 months
Radiographic evaluation
Time Frame: immediate postoperative

Cone beam computed tomography scan will be taken at preoperative visit to assess:Residual bone height (RBH) which is the distance from the alveolar crest to the floor of the maxillary sinus at the intended implant placement site.

  • Implant protrusion (IP):measured as the distance from the sinus floor to implant apex.
  • Graft height apically (GHa):the distance fom implant apex to the highest level of the grafting material (the new sinus floor).
  • Grafted sinus height (GSH):the distance from the original sinus floor to the new sinus floor which is the implant protrusion plus the graft height beyond the implant apex (IP +GHa).
immediate postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
implant stability
Time Frame: 6 months

implant stability using The Ostell ISQ scale: The ISQ scale ranges from 0 to 100 that measures implant stability. The values less than 60 indicate low implant stability; values from 60 to 69 indicate medium stability where values between 70 and 79 indicate high stability.

6 implants from each group will be assessed regarding implant stability at 3 months post-operative using this ISQ scale to determine implant stability and data will be analyzed statistically for significance.

6 months
Bleeding
Time Frame: 6 months
Peri-implant mucosal bleeding will be graded using criteria of modified sulcus bleeding index (mBI).
6 months
Radiographic evaluation
Time Frame: 6 months

Cone beam computed tomography scan will be taken at preoperative visit to assess:Residual bone height (RBH) which is the distance from the alveolar crest to the floor of the maxillary sinus at the intended implant placement site.

  • Implant protrusion (IP):measured as the distance from the sinus floor to implant apex.
  • Graft height apically (GHa):the distance fom implant apex to the highest level of the grafting material (the new sinus floor).
  • Grafted sinus height (GSH):the distance from the original sinus floor to the new sinus floor which is the implant protrusion plus the graft height beyond the implant apex (IP +GHa).
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 18, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 10, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 10, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 27, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • M02150620

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Missed Upper Posterior Teeth

Clinical Trials on Maxillary sinus augmentation using autologous fibrin glue with simultaneous implant placement

3
Subscribe