Motion Sickness Desensitization Using VR (SENSORIEL1)

November 24, 2022 updated by: University Hospital, Caen

Evaluation and Countermeasures of Motion Sickness by Virtual Reality Desensitization Protocol

Evaluation of a virtual reality desensitization protocol on subjects with severe motion sickness and study of the role of the emotional component on the effectiveness of the therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Motion sickness is a well-known syndrome, particularly at risk in children, with a maximum around the age of 12. All people are sensitive to motion sickness in childhood, probably related to the maturation of certain cognitive functions of a spatial nature, namely the perception of oneself and one's movements in one's environment. These symptoms regress with age for a part of the population but a large number of people will remain sensitive to certain conditions of displacement and generate symptoms that can be extremely disabling and handicapping in everyday life, particularly for professional activities. For example, some people can no longer use their car, some can no longer take the boat for professional activities in restrictive and/or extreme environments (sailors, scientists, workers, etc.). Behavioral, respiratory or medicinal therapies remain partially effective due to the lack of sufficient knowledge on the physiopathology of this syndrome classified in the field of sensory disorders. Very recently, techniques of sensory desensitization by visual stimulation have appeared, either optokinetic or in virtual reality mimicking the environment that causes this syndrome. This therapeutic approach seems to give empirically good results but only one study has shown it with optokinetic stimulation but it is to be evaluated for virtual reality.

The main objective of the study is therefore to evaluate the effectiveness of a sensory conflict protocol generated in virtual reality to reduce the severity of motion sickness. Each subject being his own control. An observational study was then designed to quantify the effectiveness of this technique carried out in a current way by the physiotherapists in the form of questionnaires supplemented by a posturographic evaluation of the sensory profile of the subjects. If the effectiveness is proven, this desensitization protocol could be optimized and more widely distributed. Furthermore, the analysis of the visuo-dependence variable (from the sensory profile) will indicate whether the use of a visual stimulus by virtual reality alone is sufficient or should be combined or compared with desensitization of other sensory modalities. The use of galvanic vestibular stimulation for the rehabilitation of vestibular pathologies or training programs based on the resolution of sensory conflicts could be envisaged in the future.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Caen, France, 14033
        • Recruiting
        • CAEN University Hospital
      • Vitrolles, France, 13127
        • Recruiting
        • Frédéric Xavier

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 67 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Suffering from motion sickness inducing a functional disability requiring a change in the mode of travel, or suffering from motion sickness disabling to exercise a leisure or professional activity involving a mode of locomotion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant woman
  • History of severe ENT or ophthalmologic pathologies.
  • Chronic treatment with an anticholinergic or anti-histamine medication.
  • Participating in another biomedical research protocol during the same period
  • Person under guardianship or curatorship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Cohort of motion sickness
one group of patient
rehabilitation through using session of virtual reality desensitization

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
motion sickness severity
Time Frame: day 0 (day before the first session of rehabilitation)
simulator sickness questionnaire (0-64)
day 0 (day before the first session of rehabilitation)
motion sickness severity
Time Frame: day 30 (day after the end of rehabilitation)
simulator sickness questionnaire (0-64)
day 30 (day after the end of rehabilitation)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Emotion
Time Frame: day 0 (day before the first session of rehabilitation)
The State-Trait Anxiety Questionnaire (0-80)
day 0 (day before the first session of rehabilitation)
Emotion
Time Frame: day 30 (day after the end of rehabilitation)
The State-Trait Anxiety Questionnaire (0-80)
day 30 (day after the end of rehabilitation)
Posture
Time Frame: day 0 (day before the first session of rehabilitation)
postural measurement (gravity center ellipse)
day 0 (day before the first session of rehabilitation)
Posture
Time Frame: day 30 (day after the end of rehabilitation)
postural measurement (gravity center ellipse)
day 30 (day after the end of rehabilitation)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: stephane BESNARD, Md,PhD, University Hospital, Caen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 10, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 28, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 28, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 28, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 17-083

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Motion Sickness

Clinical Trials on physiotherapy

3
Subscribe