Hydrogel Coating to Reduce Post-surgical Infection After Joint Arthroplasty

January 15, 2024 updated by: Medacta International SA

Randomized, Controlled, Monocentric, Feasibility Clinical Investigation to Assess the Safety and Preliminary Clinical Performance of a Hydrogel Coating to Reduce Post-surgical Infection After Joint Arthroplasty

The goal of this randomized, controlled, monocentric, single-blind, 2-arm, feasibility clinical investigation is to evaluate the safety of MectaShield hydrogel coating and to capture its preliminary clinical performance in the prevention of early peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients undergoing cementless revision hip arthroplasty.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • demonstrate that the hydrogel coating MectaShield does not interfere with primary stability;
  • evaluate clinical and functional outcomes, the rate of PJI and possible adverse events.

Participants will undergo cementless revision hip arthroplasty; during surgery MectaShield hydrogel coating is applied on orthopaedic implants' surfaces (femoral stem and, if revised, acetabular cup) as a protective barrier for the prevention of bacterial adhesion. Surgery and follow-up are completed as per local standard practice. Stability will be assessed radiologically, while functional outcomes and PJI will be monitored by HOOS-PS, ASESPIS scores and according to the consensus document presented by European Society of Radiology (ESRa), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID). Researchers will compare the results of the treatment group with those from a control group receiving cementless revision hip arthroplasty without the application of MectaShiled hydrogel coating.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is among the first three reasons for joint replacement failure. PJI is a serious condition that may lead to repeated surgical interventions, prolonged hospitalization, high costs, and significant morbidity, although low mortality. To address this concern, antibacterial coating of implants has been proposed, as the adherence of the microorganisms to the implant, forming a biofilm, plays a strategic role in the pathogenesis of PJI. MectaShield (Medacta International SA) is a novel resorbable hydrogel coating intended to be spread on orthopaedic implants' surfaces as a protective barrier for the prevention of PJI. The study aims to evaluate the safety of MectaShield and to capture its preliminary clinical performance in the prevention of early PJI in patients undergoing cementless revision hip arthroplasty.

Patients suitable to receive MectaShield for cementless revision hip arthroplasty will be invited to take part to the study during the preoperative visit. Follow-up is performed after 3 and 12 months. Data collection includes clinical and functional data for preoperative and postoperative assessments, as well as intraoperative details, adverse events and device deficiencies. Patients will be randomized 1:1 in 2 groups:

  • Control (no MectaShield)
  • MectaShield hydrogel coating (+ antibiotic)

The primary objective is to demonstrate that MectaShield hydrogel coating does not interfere with early primary stability at 3 months of follow-up

Secondary objectives are:

  1. To demonstrate that MectaShield does not interfere with primary stability at 12 months of follow-up
  2. To evaluate clinical and functional outcomes at 3 and 12 months of follow-up
  3. To evaluate the rate of PJI at 3 and 12 months of follow-up
  4. To evaluate the occurrence of adverse events and device deficiencies

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

56

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Wien, Austria, 1130
        • Recruiting
        • Orthopädisches Spital Speising GmbH
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed Consent signed by the subject
  • Males and females aged over 18 years at time of surgery
  • Subjects who are scheduled to receive a conical collarless cementless revision hip arthroplasty, with or without revision of the acetabular cup
  • Subjects willing to comply with the pre- and post-operative evaluation schedule

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with one or more medical conditions identified as a contraindication defined by the labelling on any implants used in this study
  • Subjects with immune suppressive treatment for organ transplantation, or known allergy to MectaShield hydrogel constituents (Chitlac, Mannitol, Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, Sodium phosphate dibasic)
  • Subjects presenting with progressive local or systemic infection at the time of surgery
  • Subjects whose prospects for a recovery to independent mobility would be compromised by known coexistent, medical problems
  • Subjects affected by concomitant spine, hip, ankle or contralateral knee pathologies that can affect walking capacity
  • Subjects unable to understand and take action
  • Subjects undergoing cementless revision hip arthroplasty in emergency interventions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hydrogel coating
cementless revision hip arthroplasty with hydrogel coating applied on orthopaedic implants' surfaces
hydrogel coating applied to implant's surfaces during cementless hip revision arthroplasty
Sham Comparator: Control
cementless revision hip arthroplasty
standard cementless hip revision arthroplasty

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stem subsidence
Time Frame: 3 months follow up
Radiological measurements of stem subsidence (mm) will be performed in hydrogel coating and control groups, and mean subsidence will be compared
3 months follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stem subsidence
Time Frame: 12 months follow up
Radiological measurements of stem subsidence (mm) will be performed in hydrogel coating and control groups, and mean subsidence will be compared.
12 months follow up
Presence of radiolucent zones in the femur
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months follow up
Presence of radiolucent lines (≥1 mm) in the 7 Gruen zones will be assessed by radiologic assessment.
3 and 12 months follow up
Cup migration (if revised)
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months follow up
Radiological measurements will be performed on the Acetabular cup (if revised) to measure cup migration.
3 and 12 months follow up
Cup orientation (if revised)
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months follow up
Radiological measurements will be performed on the Acetabular cup (if revised) to measure cup tilt.
3 and 12 months follow up
Presence of radiolucent lines in the acetabular cup (if revised)
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months follow up
Radiological measurements will be performed on the Acetabular cup (if revised) to evaluate the presence of radiolucent lines in the 3 DeLee-Charnley zones (≥1mm).
3 and 12 months follow up
Clinical and functional outcomes
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months follow up
Evaluation of daily-life activities, measured with the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Physical Function Short Form (HOOS-PS) [0 - 100, worst to best].
3 and 12 months follow up
Signs of infection
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months follow up
Evaluation of any sign of infection at the site of surgery, measured with the ASESPIS score (acronym for "Additional treatment, Serous discharge, Erythema, Purulent exudate, Separation of deep tissues, Isolation of bacteria, and Stay as inpatient prolonged over 14 days") [0 - >40, best to worst].
3 and 12 months follow up
occurrence of PJI
Time Frame: up to 12 months
The occurrence of PJI is assessed with the diagnostic flowchart proposed by the consensus document issued by the European Society of Radiology (ESRa), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID).
up to 12 months
Peri-operative and postoperative adverse events and device deficiencies.
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Monitoring of any peri-operative and postoperative adverse events and device deficiencies.
up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Martin Dominkus, Prof. Dr., Orthopädisches Spital Speising GmbH

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 6, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 6, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 6, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 10, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P01.025.01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Hydrogel coating

3
Subscribe