Analyzing of the Reliability, Validity and Responsiveness Levels of Performance Tests

Analyzing of the Reliability, Validity and Responsiveness Levels of Performance Tests Assessing Fall Risk and Balance in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

Purpose: To examine the validity, reliability and responsiveness of three performance tests evaluating fall risk and balance in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Method: At least 50 patients with TKA will be included in the study. Participants will be voluntary individuals who meet the inclusion criteria. Within the scope of the evaluations, the duration of the patients to perform the 360° Turn Test (360°TT), Alternative Step Test (AST), and Pen Pickup Test (PPT) will be measured. These tests will be repeated after the patients rest for 1 hour. Hospital For Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Score to determine the functional level of patients, Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT) to determine fall risk and balance status, 5-Repeat Stand Up and Sit Test (5RSST) and 10-meter Walk Test (10MWT) will be used. In addition, the fall history of the patients will be questioned. For the construct validity of the 360°TT, AST and PPT tests, it will be investigated whether at least 75% of the predetermined hypotheses are met. For the discriminative validity of the 360°TT, AST and PPT tests, the values in the homogeneous demographic patient population with grade 3-4 knee osteoarthritis and the patient population undergoing knee arthroplasty will be compared and cut-off values will be calculated. In addition, sensitivity and specificity values will be calculated. In addition, test values will be compared and cut-off values will be calculated in patients who have undergone knee arthroplasty with and without a history of falling. In addition, sensitivity and specificity values will be calculated. Reliability will be examined by examining the test-retest intra-class correlation. In addition, in order to examine the responsiveness of the tests, patients will be taught lower extremity strengthening exercises and balance exercises in the form of a home program after the initial assessment. The second evaluation will be repeated between 6-8 weeks following the first evaluation, and the responsiveness of the tests will be determined according to the average change in the outcome measurements and the fulfillment of the hypotheses.

Study Overview

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Conditions: the Methodology of the Balance Test
• Intervention / Treatment: Diagnostic test: performance based balance test

Detailed Description

Hospital For Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Scoring This scoring includes the parameters of pain (30 points), function (22 points), range of motion (18 points), muscle strength (10 points), knee joint flexion deformity (10 points), instability (10 points) and a total of 100 points. The HSS score is obtained by subtracting up to 3 points for walking aids, up to 5 points for loss of extension, and 1 point for each 5 degree varus/valgus angle from the total score. The score ranges obtained are classified as excellent for 85-100 points, good for 70-84 points, moderate for 60-69 points, and bad for less than 60 points.

360° Turn Test In this test, which is used to measure dynamic balance, the participant rotates 360° all round. The time the participant completes the turn and the number of steps are recorded. If the cut-off value is > 3.8 seconds in the elderly population, there is a risk of falling.

Alternative Step Test It is a test used to test body weight transfer and lateral stability. The participant -height 18 cm, width 60 cm, width 40 cm- comes into contact with the sole of the foot in rows of right and left. A total of 8 step times, 4 right and 4 left, are recorded in seconds.

Pen Pickup Test In this test, in which mobility, flexibility and dynamic balance are evaluated, the participant bends down and picks up a pencil 30 cm from the tip of the foot while standing and comes back to the upright position. The duration of the movement is recorded in seconds.

Timed Get Up and Go Test It is a physical performance test often used to assess fall risk and balance. The participant gets up from a standard-height chair without support, returns after walking 3 meters, and sits down again without support. The time is saved. A value > 14 sec is considered a fall risk. Its validity and reliability have been demonstrated in different populations.

5 Repetitive Stand Up and Sit Test (5RSST) It is a performance test in which the dynamic balance is evaluated by recording the performance of people getting up and sitting in a standard chair 5 times in a series of time.

10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT) It is a performance test in which dynamic balance is evaluated by recording the 10-meter walking performance of individuals in terms of time.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Anticipated): 100
• Phase: Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Having primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for knee osteoarthritis
• Having completed at least 6 months after primary TKA
• Being able to stand and walk without the need for any assistive device
• Being able to understand written or spoken commands
• Having grade 3-4 radiological knee osteoarthritis

Exclusion Criteria:

• Other existing pain problem or central or peripheral nervous system condition causing sensory dysfunction (eg stroke, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord disorders or peripheral nerve lesion)
• Different lower extremity surgeries before or after primary TKA
• Neurological or orthopedic disorder that may affect gait and balance
• Other unstable diseases (eg cancer, acute trauma or infection)
• Presence of inflammatory arthritis or other systemic connective tissue disease
• Those who have lost their walking function
• Body mass index > 40 (morbidly obese)

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
• Allocation: N/A
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

1

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Intervention / Treatment

Other: Dokuz Eylul University; Dokuz Eylul University Clinic

Diagnostic test: performance based balance test; Performance based balance test; 360° Turn Test, Alternative Step Test, Pen Pickup Test,5 Repetitive Stand Up and Sit Test, 10 Meter Walk Test Lower extremity strengthening exercises; Quadriceps femoris strengthening exercise Hamstring strengthening exercise Gluteus medius muscle strengthening exercise Strengthening exercise for hip adductor muscles Balance exercises; Standing tandem walk Standing side walks Standing cross walks Standing back walking; Other Names: lower extremity strengthening exercises; balance exercises

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
360° Turn Test	In this test, which is used to measure dynamic balance, the participant rotates 360° all round. The time the participant completes the turn and the number of steps are recorded. If the cut-off value is > 3.8 seconds in the elderly population, there is a risk of falling.	up to 2 months
Alternative Step Test	It is a test used to test body weight transfer and lateral stability. The participant -height 18 cm, width 60 cm, width 40 cm- comes into contact with the sole of the foot in rows of right and left. A total of 8 step times, 4 right and 4 left, are recorded in seconds.	up to 2 months
Pen Pickup Test	In this test, in which mobility, flexibility and dynamic balance are evaluated, the participant bends down and picks up a pencil 30 cm from the tip of the foot while standing and comes back to the upright position. The duration of the movement is recorded in seconds.	up to 2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Timed Up and Go Test	It is a physical performance test often used to assess fall risk and balance. The participant gets up from a standard-height chair without support, returns after walking 3 meters, and sits down again without support. The time is saved. A value > 14 sec is considered a fall risk. Its validity and reliability have been demonstrated in different populations.	up to 2 months
5 Repetitive Stand Up and Sit Test	It is a performance test in which the dynamic balance is evaluated by recording the performance of people getting up and sitting in a standard chair 5 times in a series of time.	up to 2 months
10 Meter Walk Test	It is a performance test in which dynamic balance is evaluated by recording the 10-meter walking performance of individuals in terms of time.	up to 2 months
Hospital For Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Scoring	This scoring includes the parameters of pain (30 points), function (22 points), range of motion (18 points), muscle strength (10 points), knee joint flexion deformity (10 points), instability (10 points) and a total of 100 points. The HSS score is obtained by subtracting up to 3 points for walking aids, up to 5 points for loss of extension, and 1 point for each 5 degree varus/valgus angle from the total score. The score ranges obtained are classified as excellent for 85-100 points, good for 70-84 points, moderate for 60-69 points, and bad for less than 60 points.	up to 2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Dokuz Eylul University

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Anticipated): February 1, 2023
• Primary Completion (Anticipated): April 1, 2023
• Study Completion (Anticipated): May 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: December 29, 2022
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 19, 2023
• First Posted (Estimate): January 30, 2023

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): January 30, 2023
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 19, 2023
• Last Verified: January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: total knee arthroplasty; validity; balance; reliability; test
• Other Study ID Numbers: 0000-0003-2719-3255

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No
• IPD Plan Description: We do not consider data sharing

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No