Routine Versus As-Needed Stress Testing in Asymptomatic Patients With High-Risk Coronary Calcium (SMART-EXAM)

March 21, 2023 updated by: Seung-Hyuk Choi, Samsung Medical Center

SMart Angioplasty Research Team-Pragmatic Randomized Trial for Comparing Routine Versus As-Needed EXercise or Pharmacologic Stress Testing in Asymptomatic Patients With High-Risk Coronary CalciuM (SMART-EXAM)

The purpose of the SMART-EXAM (SMart Angioplasty Research Team-Pragmatic Randomized Trial for Comparing Routine versus As-Needed EXercise or Pharmacologic Stress Testing in Asymptomatic Patients with High-Risk Coronary CalciuM) trial is to compare the major adverse cardiovascular events between routine stress testing and as-needed stress testing in asymptomatic patients with high-risk coronary calcium (Agatston Score ≥ 400) without proven ASCVD.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The coronary artery calcium (CAC) scan, a marker of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis, has become popular for individuals at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. CAC is strongly associated with atherosclerotic burden and predicts coronary heart disease events and mortality, regardless of their age, sex, race, or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. Furthermore, the progression of CAC is associated with an increased risk for future hard and total coronary heart disease events. The use of CAC scoring was associated with significant improvements in the reclassification and discrimination of incident ASCVD. Nevertheless, the current guidelines recommend CAC measurement for selected cases only with borderline or intermediate risk of ASCVD. However, in real-world practice, CAC testing is increasingly being promoted to the public as a means of self-assessment of cardiovascular risk and is widely being used regardless of ASCVD risk.

Non-invasive stress testing is often recommended to exclude potentially dangerous coronary artery disease. However, stress testing in asymptomatic individuals has low sensitivity and specificity.9 Although the 2019 Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Guidelines do not comment on functional or invasive testing in asymptomatic individuals with a high CAC score, the 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging report gives a level A recommendation for obtaining a stress test in asymptomatic individuals with CAC score ≥400.10 In addition, the 2013 update of the 2009 document also considers stress imaging appropriate for patients with CAC score >100. However, there have been no large randomized controlled trials or observational studies that have evaluated the utility of functional or invasive testing in asymptomatic individuals free of ASCVD with high CAC scores. Theoretically, early detection and revascularization of ischemia producing lesions in asymptomatic patients with high-risk coronary calcification without proven ASCVD might reduce the future risk of major adverse cardiovascular events.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

3000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject must be at least 19 years of age. ② Asymptomatic patients with high-risk coronary calcium (Agatston Score ≥ 400)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Documentation of objective evidence of inducible ischemia before enrollment

    • Presence of significant coronary artery stenosis (≥ 70% diameter stenosis) confirmed by coronary angiography or coronary computed tomography angiography before enrollment

      • History of coronary revascularization procedure ④ Pregnancy or breast feeding ⑤ Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy <1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment) ⑥ Unwillingness or inability to comply with the procedures described in this protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Routine stress testing
In this group, the preselected functional stress testing (exercise electrocardiography, stress echocardiography, nuclear imaging, or stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging) will be performed within three months (± 2 months) according to the practice pattern of each participating center.
Nuclear imaging, stress echocardiography, exercise electrocardiography, stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
Active Comparator: As-needed stress testing
In this group, optimal medical treatment will be performed by current guidelines without further testing. A stress test will be performed only when new symptoms (exertional chest pain or dyspnea) occur that may clinically suggest significant coronary artery disease.
Optimal medical treatment for primary prevention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up
a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, unplanned hospitalization leading to an urgent revascularization procedure, or heart failure hospitalization
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
cardiovascular death
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up
death from cardiovascular causes
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up
myocardial infarction
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up
myocardial infarction
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up
unplanned hospitalization leading to an urgent revascularization procedure
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up
unplanned hospitalization leading to an urgent revascularization procedure
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up
heart failure hospitalization
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up
heart failure hospitalization
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up
all-cause death
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up
death from any causes
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up
a composite of death from cardiovascular cause or myocardial infarction
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up
a composite of death from cardiovascular cause or myocardial infarction
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up
any hospitalization
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up
any hospitalization
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up
performing revascularization procedure
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up
performing revascularization procedure
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up
performing invasive coronary angiography procedure
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up
performing invasive coronary angiography procedure
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up
stroke
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up
stroke
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up
bleeding
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up
Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2-5
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up
total medical cost
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up
total medical cost
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Seung-Hyuk Choi, MD, Samsung Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

May 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2029

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Atherosclerosis Due to Calcified Coronary Lesion

Clinical Trials on Non-invasive stress test

3
Subscribe