Efficacy and Safety of Fospropofol Disodium Versus Propofol for Deep Sedation in Critically Ill Patients

July 1, 2023 updated by: Xiaobo Yang, MD
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fospropofol disodium for injection compared to propofol for deep sedation in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a randomized, open-label, small sample study using fospropofol disodium and propofol for deep sedation in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Subjects are randomized to different treatment groups (including 1 for fospropofol disodium and 1 for propofol). Remifentanil is co-administered with fospropofol or propofol. Efficacy and safety profiles of fospropofol disodium and propofol are to be monitoted.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430022
        • Recruiting
        • Wuhan Union Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years; Expected to require deep sedation ≥8 hours; Requirement for deep sedation (a Narcotrend index between 13 and 64).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Body mass index (BMI) <18 or >30 kg/m2; Contraindicate or allergic to study drugs; Moribund state; Expected to have a general anesthesia within 8 hours; Myasthenia gravis; Acute hepatitis or serious hepatic dysfunction (Child-Pugh class C); Chronic kidney disease with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 29 ml/min/1.73m2; Systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg after appropriate intravenous volume replacement and continuous infusions of 2 vasopressors; Acute severe neurological disorder and any other condition interfering with RASS assessment; Pregnancy or lactation; Unstable angina; Acute myocardial infarction; Left ventricular ejection fraction less than 30%; Heart rate less than 50 beats/min; Second- or third-degree heart block in the absence of a pacemaker; Alcohol abuse or drug abuse.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fospropofol disodium for injection
Patients in the experimental group received fospropofol disodium for injection at an initial infusion rate of 10 mg/kg/h and adjusted to maintain a Narcotrend index between 13 and 64.
Patients in the experimental group received fospropofol disodium for injection at an initial infusion rate of 10 mg/kg/h and adjusted to maintain a Narcotrend index between 13 and 64.
Active Comparator: Propofol
Patients in the active comparator group received propofol at an initial infusion rate of 3 mg/kg/h and adjusted to maintain a Narcotrend index between 13 and 64.
Propofol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The percentage of time in the target sedation range without rescue sedation
Time Frame: From start of study to 48 hours
The percentage of time in the target sedation range without rescue sedation
From start of study to 48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of ICU stay
Time Frame: From start of study to 28 days
Length of ICU stay
From start of study to 28 days
28-day mortality
Time Frame: From start of study to 28 days
28-day mortality
From start of study to 28 days
Adverse events
Time Frame: From start of study to 48 hours
Incidence rate of adverse events
From start of study to 48 hours
7-day ventilator free time
Time Frame: From start of study to 7 days
7-day ventilator free time
From start of study to 7 days
Success rate of extubation within 7 days
Time Frame: From start of study to 7 days
Success rate of extubation within 7 days
From start of study to 7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness

Clinical Trials on Propofol

3
Subscribe