- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05954702
Supercharged TRAM Evaluation in Cervical Esophagogastroplasty After Esophagectomy (Supercharged)
Esophagectomy has high rates of morbidity and mortality, in many cases due to esophagus reconstruction. Anastomotic leakage and fistula are the main esophagectomy complications. Many studies underwent to investigate the cause for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy, however none of them conclude it is related to surgery or suture technique. However, it seems to be triggered by the ischemia caused after stomach mobilization to esophagus reconstruction, or even tension in the anastomosis.
Considering the post esophagectomy with gastroplasty high morbidity and mortality rates, strategies to create a new vascularization source and decrease anastomotic leakage rates is important. In this study researchers will evaluate whether a TRAM flap transfer supercharged is effective on decrease morbidity related to anastomosis ischemia in patients undergoing esophagectomy.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The transfer of muscle parts is one of the main reconstruction techniques used in plastic surgery. Transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap transfers are very considered due to high quality results, wide application in many cases, and small number of reviews in long term.
Beegle, in 1991 published a new technique of using TRAM supercharged in which microsurgical anastomosis are used between TRAM's unipedicled gastroepiploic deep artery and veins and thoracic branches and vessels, such as axillary and thoracodorsal vessels.
Looking for recover tissue blood perfusion and decrease morbidity rates associated with anastomosis ischemia, some studies showed large intestine or jejunum interposition plus an additional blood supply through venous and arterial anastomosis - colon or jejunum supercharged is effective. The isoperistaltic supercharged colon interposition was a good option to rebuild big esophagus parts in which stomach was not available.
Considering the post esophagectomy with gastroplasty high morbidity and mortality rates, strategies to create a new vascularization source and decrease anastomotic leakage rates is important. This is a single-institution, randomized clinical trial with participants recruited in the digestive system surgery clinic, at the Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP). Patients will be randomized to conventional esophagectomy or TRAM supercharged esophagectomy, and researchers will evaluate post-operatory complications in both groups.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Flavio Takeda, PhD, MD
- Phone Number: +55 11 999079973
- Email: flavio.takeda@hc.fm.usp.br
Study Locations
-
-
SP
-
São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 01246000
- Recruiting
- Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP)
-
Contact:
- Flavio Takeda, MD
-
Principal Investigator:
- Flavio Takeda, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of esophageal malignancy cancer;
- Ability to understand and collaborate during treatment;
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous gastrectomy;
- Previous abdominal surgery with risk of altering stomach vascularization;
- Previous head and neck surgery with risk of alteration of cervical vessels.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Conventional Esophagectomy group
Patients with malignant esophagus neoplasms randomized to Conventional Esophagectomy will undergo to an esophagectomy, immediately followed by an esophagus reconstruction trough esophagogastroplasty.
|
Esophagectomy, immediately followed by an esophagus reconstruction trough esophagogastroplasty.
|
Experimental: Supercharged TRAM esophagectomy group
Patients with malignant esophagus neoplasms randomized to Supercharged TRAM esophagectomy will undergo to esophagectomy, immediately followed by supercharged esophagogastroplasty.
|
Esophagectomy, immediately followed by supercharged esophagogastroplasty. Use the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap transfers to surgically create a new anastomosis in the left gastroepiploic vessels.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Presence and number of post-operatory complications
Time Frame: Until 1 year after Surgery
|
surgical wound infection, hematoma, anastomotic leakage, stenosis, chylothorax and clinical complications due to hospitalization
|
Until 1 year after Surgery
|
Mortality
Time Frame: Until 1 year after surgery after surgery
|
Patients who and when died
|
Until 1 year after surgery after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Days in intensive care unit
Time Frame: From the surgery day until the date patient leave intensive care unit
|
Number of days patient will stay at intensive care unit
|
From the surgery day until the date patient leave intensive care unit
|
Hospitalization period
Time Frame: From the surgery day until the date patient leave hospital
|
Number of days patient will stay in hospital after surgery
|
From the surgery day until the date patient leave hospital
|
Need of vasoactive drugs
Time Frame: From the surgery day until the date patient leave hospital
|
If patient use vasoactive drugs drugs hospitalization
|
From the surgery day until the date patient leave hospital
|
Blood transfusion need
Time Frame: From the surgery day until the date patient leave hospital
|
If patients need blood transfusion during hospitalization
|
From the surgery day until the date patient leave hospital
|
Drain use time
Time Frame: From the surgery day until the date patient took off drain
|
How long patient use drain
|
From the surgery day until the date patient took off drain
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Flavio Takeda, PhD, MD, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
- Lagergren J, Bergstrom R, Lindgren A, Nyren O. Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1999 Mar 18;340(11):825-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199903183401101.
- Lagergren J, Bergstrom R, Nyren O. Association between body mass and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia. Ann Intern Med. 1999 Jun 1;130(11):883-90. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-11-199906010-00003.
- Kassis ES, Kosinski AS, Ross P Jr, Koppes KE, Donahue JM, Daniel VC. Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Dec;96(6):1919-26. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.119. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
- Akiyama H, Miyazono H, Tsurumaru M, Hashimoto C, Kawamura T. Use of the stomach as an esophageal substitute. Ann Surg. 1978 Nov;188(5):606-10. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197811000-00004.
- Collard JM, Tinton N, Malaise J, Romagnoli R, Otte JB, Kestens PJ. Esophageal replacement: gastric tube or whole stomach? Ann Thorac Surg. 1995 Aug;60(2):261-6; discussion 267. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00411-d.
- Briel JW, Tamhankar AP, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Johansson J, Choustoulakis E, Peters JH, Bremner CG, DeMeester TR. Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition. J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Apr;198(4):536-41; discussion 541-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.11.026.
- Akiyama H. Surgery for carcinoma of the esophagus. Curr Probl Surg. 1980 Feb;17(2):53-120. doi: 10.1016/s0011-3840(80)80025-6. No abstract available.
- Barzin A, Norton JA, Whyte R, Lee GK. Supercharged jejunum flap for total esophageal reconstruction: single-surgeon 3-year experience and outcomes analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jan;127(1):173-180. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f95a36.
- Bourke MJ, Hope RL, Chu G, Gillespie PE, Bull C, O'Rourke I, Williams SJ. Laser palliation of inoperable malignant dysphagia: initial and at death. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996 Jan;43(1):29-32. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70256-0.
- Buskens CJ, Hulscher JB, Fockens P, Obertop H, van Lanschot JJ. Benign tracheo-neo-esophageal fistulas after subtotal esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Jul;72(1):221-4. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02701-1.
- D'Amico TA, Harpole DH Jr. Molecular biology of esophageal cancer. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 2000 Aug;10(3):451-69.
- Domper Arnal MJ, Ferrandez Arenas A, Lanas Arbeloa A. Esophageal cancer: Risk factors, screening and endoscopic treatment in Western and Eastern countries. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 14;21(26):7933-43. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i26.7933.
- Edsander-Nord A, Jurell G, Wickman M. Donor-site morbidity after pedicled or free TRAM flap surgery: a prospective and objective study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Oct;102(5):1508-16. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199810000-00025.
- El-Mrakby HH, Milner RH, McLean NR. Supercharged pedicled TRAM flap in breast reconstruction: is it a worthwhile procedure. Ann Plast Surg. 2002 Sep;49(3):252-7. doi: 10.1097/00000637-200209000-00003.
- Ferguson A, Kingstone K. Coeliac disease and malignancies. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1996 May;412:78-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1996.tb14259.x.
- Garcia-Vasquez C, Fernandez-Acenero MJ, Garcia Gomez-Heras S, Pastor C. Fibrin patch influences the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha and nuclear factor-kappaBp65 factors on ischemic intestinal anastomosis. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2018 Jun;243(10):803-808. doi: 10.1177/1535370218777216.
- GARLOCK JH. Resection of thoracic esophagus for carcinoma located above arch of aorta; cervical esophagogastrostomy. Surgery. 1948 Jul;24(1):1-8. No abstract available.
- GARLOCK JH. Combined abdominothoracic approach for carcinoma of cardia and lower esophagus. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1946 Dec;83(6):737-41. No abstract available.
- Garvey PB, Buchel EW, Pockaj BA, Casey WJ 3rd, Gray RJ, Hernandez JL, Samson TD. DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 May;117(6):1711-9; discussion 1720-1. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000210679.77449.7d.
- Goffi FS, Bevilacqua RG, Ferreira EA, Silva PA, Pinheiro Y, Lima EW, Bastos Eda S. [Surgery of cancer of he esophagus. Technic and results]. AMB Rev Assoc Med Bras. 1969 Jan;15(1):37-42. No abstract available. Portuguese.
- Griffin SM, Lamb PJ, Dresner SM, Richardson DL, Hayes N. Diagnosis and management of a mediastinal leak following radical oesophagectomy. Br J Surg. 2001 Oct;88(10):1346-51. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01918.x.
- Grotting JC, Beckenstein MS, Arkoulakis NS. The art and science of autologous breast reconstruction. Breast J. 2003 Sep-Oct;9(5):350-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2003.09527.x.
- Harashina T, Sone K, Inoue T, Fukuzumi S, Enomoto K. Augmentation of circulation of pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps by microvascular surgery. Br J Plast Surg. 1987 Jul;40(4):367-70. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(87)90039-7.
- Scheflan M, Hartrampf CR, Black PW. Breast reconstruction with a transverse abdominal island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982 May;69(5):908-9. No abstract available.
- Hermreck AS, Crawford DG. The esophageal anastomotic leak. Am J Surg. 1976 Dec;132(6):794-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(76)90461-x.
- Holmstrom H. The free abdominoplasty flap and its use in breast reconstruction. An experimental study and clinical case report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;13(3):423-27. doi: 10.3109/02844317909013092.
- Kesler KA, Pillai ST, Birdas TJ, Rieger KM, Okereke IC, Ceppa D, Socas J, Starnes SL. "Supercharged" isoperistaltic colon interposition for long-segment esophageal reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Apr;95(4):1162-8; discussion 1168-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.01.006. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
- Kim EK, Lee TJ, Eom JS. Comparison of fat necrosis between zone II and zone III in pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps: a prospective study of 400 consecutive cases. Ann Plast Surg. 2007 Sep;59(3):256-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000252770.15946.14.
- Kim SH, Lee KS, Shim YM, Kim K, Yang PS, Kim TS. Esophageal resection: indications, techniques, and radiologic assessment. Radiographics. 2001 Sep-Oct;21(5):1119-37; discussion 1138-40. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.21.5.g01se031119.
- Koop H. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus. Endoscopy. 2004 Feb;36(2):103-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-814177.
- Kroll SS. Bilateral breast reconstruction in very thin patients with extended free TRAM flaps. Br J Plast Surg. 1998 Oct;51(7):535-7. doi: 10.1054/bjps.1998.0014.
- van Lanschot JJ, Hulscher JB, Buskens CJ, Tilanus HW, ten Kate FJ, Obertop H. Hospital volume and hospital mortality for esophagectomy. Cancer. 2001 Apr 15;91(8):1574-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010415)91:83.0.co;2-2.
- LONGMIRE WP Jr. A modification of the Roux technique for antethoracic esophageal reconstruction. Surgery. 1947 Jul;22(1):94-100. No abstract available.
- Marck KW, van der Biezen JJ, Dol JA. Internal mammary artery and vein supercharge in TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Microsurgery. 1996;17(7):371-4. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2752(1996)17:73.0.CO;2-J.
- Liebermann-Meffert DM, Meier R, Siewert JR. Vascular anatomy of the gastric tube used for esophageal reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992 Dec;54(6):1110-5. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(92)90077-h.
- Morris SF, Taylor GI. Predicting the survival of experimental skin flaps with a knowledge of the vascular architecture. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993 Dec;92(7):1352-61.
- NAKAYAMA K. Statistical review of five-year survivals after surgery for carcinoma of the esophagus and cardiac portion of the stomach. Surgery. 1959 Jun;45(6):883-9. No abstract available.
- Molina-Navarro C, Hosking SW, Hayward SJ, Flowerdew AD. Gastroaortic fistula as an early complication of esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Nov;72(5):1783-8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02569-8.
- Pernia LR, Miller HL, Saltz R, Vasconez LO. "Supercharging" the rectus abdominis muscle to provide a single flap for cover of large mediastinal wound defects. Br J Plast Surg. 1991 May-Jun;44(4):243-6. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(91)90064-q.
- Rezai M, Darsow M, Kummel S, Kramer S. Autologous and alloplastic breast reconstruction--overview of techniques, indications and results. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch. 2008;48(2):68-75. doi: 10.1159/000118934. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
- Serletti JM. Breast reconstruction with the TRAM flap: pedicled and free. J Surg Oncol. 2006 Nov 1;94(6):532-7. doi: 10.1002/jso.20492.
- Urschel JD. Ischemic conditioning of the stomach may reduce the incidence of esophagogastric anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a hypothesis. Dis Esophagus. 1997 Jul;10(3):217-9. doi: 10.1093/dote/10.3.217.
- Valverde A, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Elhadad A. Manual versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after resection for carcinoma: a controlled trial. French Associations for Surgical Research. Surgery. 1996 Sep;120(3):476-83. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6060(96)80066-3.
- Whooley BP, Law S, Murthy SC, Alexandrou A, Wong J. Analysis of reduced death and complication rates after esophageal resection. Ann Surg. 2001 Mar;233(3):338-44. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200103000-00006.
- Yamamoto Y, Nohira K, Sugihara T, Shintomi Y, Ohura T. Superiority of the microvascularly augmented flap: analysis of 50 transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996 Jan;97(1):79-83; discussion 84-5. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199601000-00013.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- NP 1683
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Esophagus Cancer
-
Mayo ClinicFred Hutchinson Cancer CenterCompletedBarrett's Esophagus With High Grade Dsyplasia | Early Esophageal CancerUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamAventis Pharmaceuticals; Pharmacia and UpjohnCompletedEsophageal Cancer | Cancer of the Esophagus | Esophageal Neoplasm | Esophagus Cancer | Cancer of EsophagusUnited States
-
University Hospital HeidelbergRecruitingEsophagus Cancer, Stage I | Esophagus Cancer, Stage IIGermany
-
University Hospitals, LeicesterNational Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom; University of LeicesterCompletedBarretts Esophagus | Esophageal High-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia | Esophageal Cancer Stage IUnited Kingdom
-
University Medical Center GroningenCompletedEsophageal Cancer | Barrett Esophagus | Dysplasia in Barrett EsophagusNetherlands
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityAmerican Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Pentax Medical CorporationCompletedBarrett's Esophagus, Esophageal Intraepithelial NeoplasiaUnited States, Germany
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...University Medical Center Groningen; UMC Utrecht; Erasmus Medical Center; Catharina... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingEsophageal Cancer | Barrett Adenocarcinoma | Barretts Esophagus With Dysplasia
-
City of Hope Medical CenterCompletedEsophageal Cancer | Esophageal Neoplasms | Gastroesophageal Reflux | Barrett Esophagus | Esophageal Adenocarcinoma | Reflux Disease | Barretts Esophagus With High Grade Dysplasia | Barrett Adenocarcinoma | Esophagus Cancer | Barrett's Esophagus Without Dysplasia | Barretts Esophagus With Dysplasia | Esophagus... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicWithdrawnEsophageal Cancer | Cancer of the Esophagus | Esophagus Cancer | Cancer of Esophagus | Esophagus Neoplasm | Neoplasms, EsophagealUnited States
-
Pentax MedicalCompletedEsophageal Cancer | Barrett's EsophagusUnited States, Netherlands
Clinical Trials on Conventional Esophagectomy
-
Sichuan UniversityUnknownPostoperative Complications | Esophageal Cancer | Pulmonary Function | DiaphragmChina
-
GEM Hospital & Research CenterUnknown
-
Fudan UniversityCompleted
-
Austrian Society Of Surgical OncologyCompletedEsophageal Cancer
-
University of California, IrvineWithdrawn
-
Fudan UniversityShanxi Province Cancer Hospital; The First Hospital of Jilin University; Fujian... and other collaboratorsUnknownEsophageal CancerChina
-
Fudan UniversityUnknownEsophageal Cancer | EsophagectomyChina
-
UMC UtrechtCompletedEsophageal Cancer | Esophageal CarcinomaNetherlands
-
Shanghai Chest HospitalChanghai Hospital; The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University; Shanghai... and other collaboratorsRecruitingEsophageal Cancer | Esophageal CarcinomaChina
-
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy...Zhejiang Cancer Hospital; Sun Yat-sen University; Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital; Fujian... and other collaboratorsUnknown