Catheter Over Needle (CON) vs Catheter Through Needle (CTN). (CONvsCTN)

April 23, 2024 updated by: Alejandro Luengo, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Randomizes Control Trial (RCT): Superiority Study on Inter Scalene Block Execution Time for Shoulder Traumatology Surgery and Non-inferiority for Effectiveness Between Two Block Methods: Catheter Over Needle (CON) vs Catheter Through Needle (CTN).

This is a randomized clinical trial with the objective of comparing the time of insertion of two types of perineural catheters in shoulder surgery. These devices are thin lines that have to be inserted over a needle or throw a needle, depending of the type of catheter that is used. The hypothesis is: the installation of Contiplex C or catheter over needle (CON) is faster than a normal contiplex catheter or Catheter throw needle (CTN) at same rate of effectivity.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

In the market, there is currently two types of catheter to perform a continuous nerve block. One is called Contiplex throw needle catheter that is the most used device and other needle available for performing this block called the Contiplex® C Set, which uses a different method called Catheter over Needle (CON). This method involves advancing the catheter immediately along with the needle upon puncture, and once it reaches the target site, the needle inside the catheter is removed, leaving the catheter in its final working position. This eliminates the step of threading the catheter through the needle. Additionally, this technique allows for the visualization of the final catheter site in vivo with a single operator.

Considering the differences between both techniques, the hypothesis proposed in this study is that in adult patients undergoing shoulder and proximal humerus surgery requiring anesthetic/analgesic management with inter-scalene catheters, the use of the Catheter over Needle (CON) technique results in shorter installation time and similar effectiveness compared to the conventional technique of catheter insertion through the needle (CTN) with tunnel fixation.

The primary objectives will be to compare the block execution times between the CTN and CON techniques, as well as the effectiveness rate of both catheters

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Santiago
      • Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital clinico UC christus
        • Contact:
          • alejandro luengo, instructor
          • Phone Number: +56990951086
          • Email: ajluengo@uc.cl
        • Contact:
          • Juan cristobal Pedemonte, Asociate Professor
          • Phone Number: +56223543269
          • Email: jcpedemo@uc.cl

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients older than 18 years
  • Rotator cuff or proximal humerus surgery
  • ASA I-III
  • BMI 18-39 kg/m2
  • Acceptance of receiving a peripheric nerve block

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide consent for the study
  • Coagulopathy
  • Sepsis
  • Severe Renal or hepatic disease (Creatinin > 2.0 or Child C)
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Previous peripheral nerve damage
  • Refusal of postoperative continuous block technique

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Contiplex C or CON
Patients who will receive a contiplex C block for interscalene nerve block. This catheter also calls Catheter over needle (CON), wich is a catheter that is inserted at the same time that the needle is advancing.
This is a catheter used for peripherical nerve block that is inserted at the same time that the needle is being introduced. When the target is achieved, the needle is retired.
Active Comparator: Contiplex or CTN
Patients who will receive a regular contiplex block for interscalene nerve block or also called Catheter throw needle (CTN). This catheter is the gold standard in this centre and the mechanism of insertion is to introduce the catheter throw the needle.
This is the traditional catheter used in this centre for peripheric nerve block. In this catheter the needle is introduced first. When the target is achieved the catheter is then introduced throw the needle and after that the needle is retired.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time of insertion
Time Frame: During Procedure
The time from the insertion of the needle in the skin to: insertion of the catheter and fixation of the tegaderm in the skin
During Procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue scale (VAS). 0 (minimum) -10 (maximum) points on VAS scale. Lower scores means less pain and higher scores means more pain.
Time Frame: 72 hours to determinate the VAS
compare both groups in terms of level of pain in VAS.
72 hours to determinate the VAS
Rate of accidental
Time Frame: 72 hrs to evaluate the rate of accidental withdrawal
Accidental withdrawal is the accidental withdrawal of the catheter before 72 hrs after surgery
72 hrs to evaluate the rate of accidental withdrawal

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 30, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 24, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 211124003

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shoulder Disease

Clinical Trials on CON - Contiplex C™ (CC)

3
Subscribe