The Impact of a Telephone Reminiscence Program

July 26, 2023 updated by: Juliette Shellman, University of Connecticut

The Impact of a Telephone Reminiscence Program on Reminiscence Functions and Mental Health Outcomes in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

The purpose of this study is to better understand how a telephone reminiscence program impacts reminiscence functions and mental health outcomes in community-dwelling older adults.This study will take 12 weeks to complete and will include approximately 90 study participants. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two telephone reminiscence groups.They will be either assigned to begin a telephone reminiscence program immediately or in 6 weeks. Participants will receive automatic calls three times a week asking the meaningful questions about their lives. At week 1, week 6, and week 12, participants will also be asked to complete assessments via phone, by research assistants using four questionnaires.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The prevalence of social isolation and loneliness among older adults is a public health problem. It is reported that 25 % of community-dwelling older adults 65 and older are socially isolated while 43 % of older adults 60 and older feel lonely (Cudge et al., 2020). Research has shown that social isolation and loneliness are associated with cardiovascular disease, stroke, depression, dementia, and mortality (Holjlerda, 2016). Loneliness, in particular, has been identified as a potential predictor of mild cognitive impairment (Bundy, et al., 2021; Sutin et al., 2018; Dahlberg, 2021). As a result of the prevalence data, gerontologists and researchers have cited the need for developing, implementing and testing innovative interventions to address this problem. Reminiscence is one example of a cost-effective intervention shown to decrease loneliness and improve mental health and wellness.

STORII is a telephone reminiscence program designed to provide a service that automatically calls older adults three times a week asking them meaningful questions about their lives. The participants have the opportunity to select curated prompts that enable them to record their life stories through the phone. The participants can choose to share them online with their families. Through formative evaluation of the program, the STORII team has noted that their participants to be highly satisfied and highly engaged. As a result of these informal data, it was decided that a more in-depth investigation should be undertaken. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the impact of the STORII program on reminiscence functions and mental health outcomes in community-dwelling older adults.

Participants will be invited to join a telephone reminiscence program designed to provide a service that automatically calls older adults three times a week asking them meaningful questions about their lives. Examples of the questions are "What is the best meal you have ever tasted?", "What is one of your proudest moments?", "What is your earliest memory?". Participants can share as much or as little as they would like. They have up to 10 minutes to record the answers and can end the call at any time by hanging up. There will be no operator on the line that can hear or respond. The participants can choose to share their stories online with their families.

All outcome measures will be assessed at baseline (T0), 6-week post-test (T1), and at 12-week follow-up (T2). Participants will complete assessments via phone, by trained research assistants using four questionnaires. Assessments will be completed by research assistants who are not aware of participants' allocation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • Storrs, Connecticut, United States, 06269

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults age >60 years;
  • English speaking
  • Community-dwelling
  • Willing to participate in a 12 week study
  • Willing and able to share memories using a telephone, 10 minutes, 3 times a week

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant hearing loss
  • Cognitive impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1
Participants will be asked to participate in the reminiscence program during the first 6 weeks of the study.
Participants will receive automatic calls three times a week asking their life experiences and personal memories. They can share as much or as little as they would like. They have up to 10 minutes to record their answer and can end the call at any time by hanging up.They will be able to share the stories online with their families if they want.
Experimental: Group 2
Participants will be asked to participate in the reminiscence program during the second 6 weeks of the study.
Participants will receive automatic calls three times a week asking their life experiences and personal memories. They can share as much or as little as they would like. They have up to 10 minutes to record their answer and can end the call at any time by hanging up.They will be able to share the stories online with their families if they want.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Mental health as measured by mean changes in the Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF) scores
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6 (Endpoint), Week 12 (Follow up)
The Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF) (Keyes, 2002) will be used to assess mental health and well-being. The 14 item scale measures emotional, social, and psychological dimensions of mental health. Participants answer each item on a 6-point scale, ranging from 0 and 5, resulting in a total score between 0 to 70. The emotional well-being subscale has a range from 0 to 15, the social well-being subscale scores range from 0 to 25, and the psychological well-being subscale scores range from 0 to 30. Higher scores on MHC- SF indicate a higher level of mental well-being. The MHC-SF has demonstrated excellent internal consistency (>.80) and discriminant validity in adults in the United States (Keyes, 2005, 2006), and its test-retest reliability has also been demonstrated, with an average of 0.68 over three consecutive three-month periods and 0.65 over a 9-month period (Lamers et al., 2011).
Baseline, Week 6 (Endpoint), Week 12 (Follow up)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in reminiscence functions as measured by mean changes in the Modified Reminiscence Functions Scale (MRFS) scores
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6 (Endpoint), Week 12 (Follow up)
The Modified Reminiscence Functions Scale (MRFS) containing 29 items will be used to measure reminiscence functions. The scale measures the frequency of different reminiscence functions identified as: (a) self-regard, (b) death preparation, (c) bitterness revival, (d) conversation, and (e) intimacy maintenance, teach and inform, boredom reduction, and conversation. Respondents are asked to report their level of agreement with statements such as, "When I reminisce, it is to teach younger people about cultural values" or "When I reminisce, recalling my past help me know who I am now" on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (very often). A higher score indicates more frequent reminiscences for the specific function. The Cronbach's Alpha for the subscales ranged from .73 to .91, indicating good internal consistency (Shellman & Zhang, 2014; Washington, 2009).
Baseline, Week 6 (Endpoint), Week 12 (Follow up)
Change from loneliness as measured by mean changes in UCLA 3 Item Loneliness Scale scores
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6 (Endpoint), Week 12 (Follow up)
UCLA 3 Item Loneliness Scale (UCLA 3) (Russell, 1996) is a brief 3-item scale that measures three dimensions of loneliness: relational connectedness, social connectedness, and self. Responses are provided on a 3-point response scale ranging from "hardly" to "often", with total scores ranging from 3 to 9. Higher scores indicate a higher level of loneliness. The instrument has favorable psychometric properties, including high internal consistency (ranging from 0.89 to 0.94) and a good test-retest reliability over one year (r = .73) (Russell, 1996).
Baseline, Week 6 (Endpoint), Week 12 (Follow up)
Change from life satisfaction as measured by mean changes in the Satisfaction with Life Scale scores
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6 (Endpoint), Week 12 (Follow up)
The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) (Diener et al., 1985) is a measure of life satisfaction that includes five statements, such as "In most ways, my life is close to my ideal." Responses are provided on a seven-point scale ranging from (1) "strongly disagree" to (7) "strongly agree", with a total score ranging from 7 to 35. Higher scores indicate greater life satisfaction. The scale is a highly reliable measure, with good internal consistency (0.87) and high test-retest reliability over a 2-month period (r = .82) (Diener et al., 1985).
Baseline, Week 6 (Endpoint), Week 12 (Follow up)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 25, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 4, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 4, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • H23-0046

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Health

Clinical Trials on Telephone Reminiscence Intervention

3
Subscribe